The economics of daily consumption controlling food- and water-reinforced responding.

In the first experiment, two rhesus monkeys earned their entire ration of food and water during daily sessions with no provisions to ensure constant daily intakes. Two variable-interval schedules of food presentations were concurrent with one variable-interval schedule of water presentations; the maximum rate of food presentations arranged by one food schedule was varied. As the rate of food presentations was increased, the absolute level of responding on the two food schedules combined decreased, while responding on the water schedule increased. The preference for the variable food schedule compared to the other food schedule approximately matched the proportion of reinforcers obtained from it. The preference for the variable food schedule compared to the water schedule did not match, but greatly decreased, as the proportion of reinforcers from the food schedule increased. When Experiment I was replicated, with provisions to ensure constant daily intakes of food and water (Experiment II), the absolute response rates under the two food schedules combined and under the water schedule no longer changed with increases in the rate of food during the sessions. On the other hand, choice between the two food schedules remained proportional to the distribution of obtained food pellets. These results were interpreted as indicating that behavior to obtain nonsubstitutable commodities, such as food and water, is strongly controlled by the economic conditions of daily consumption, while choice between substitutable commodities is independent of these factors.

[1]  G. Collier,et al.  Effort as determinant of intake and patterns of drinking in the guinea pig. , 1974, Physiology & behavior.

[2]  R L Shull,et al.  Response-rate invariance in concurrent schedules: effects of different changeover contingencies. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  C. van Hartesveldt,et al.  Motivation in concurrent variable-interval schedules with food and water reinforcers. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  R. Bolles The interaction of hunger and thirst in the rat. , 1961, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  G. S. Reynolds,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  C. Schuster,et al.  A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[7]  A J Neuringer,et al.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  A. Catania,et al.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  G. Collier,et al.  Defense of water balance in the rat. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  H. Rachlin Contrast and Matching. , 1973 .

[11]  G. Collier,et al.  The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat. , 1972, Physiology & behavior.

[12]  W. O. Jenkins,et al.  Rate of responding and amount of reinforcement. , 1949, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  S. Lea,et al.  Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  M C Davison,et al.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  E. Adolph Urges to eat and drink in rats. , 1947, The American journal of physiology.

[19]  S S Pliskoff,et al.  Matching with a trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  Concurrent Food- and Water-Reinforced Responding under Food, Water, and Food-Plus-Water Deprivation , 1965 .

[22]  A. Catania,et al.  Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  D L Myers,et al.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  C. Kutscher SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN THE INTERACTION OF FEEDING AND DRINKING * , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Response deprivation: An empirical approach to instrumental performance , 1974 .

[26]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter? , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[27]  G. Moran,et al.  Severe food deprivation: some thoughts regarding its exclusive use. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Formal properties of the matching law. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  H Rachlin,et al.  On the tautology of the matching law. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[31]  B. Weiss,et al.  Magnitude of reinforcement as a variable in thermoregulatory behavior. , 1960, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[32]  George Collier,et al.  Ecological determinants of reinforcement in the guinea pig. , 1974, Physiology & behavior.

[33]  S. H. Chung,et al.  Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation. , 1965, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  J. W. Kling,et al.  Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[35]  W M Baum,et al.  The correlation-based law of effect. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.