Throughput Analysis of Interference Alignment for a General Centralized Limited Feedback Model

In this paper, we consider a general centralized feedback model for interference alignment (IA) algorithms of which precoders and decoders are designed with quantized channel state information (CSI) at a central unit and then fed back to corresponding transmitters and receivers via finite-rate links. The significant difference of this model from existing models is that all the realizations of channels, precoders, and decoders are fed back by finite rates. The signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) characteristic of this model is analyzed, which helps derive an upper bound of average throughput loss relative to perfect IA. The upper bound is shown to be tight by simulation, particularly in the high-feedback regime. Based on this result, the scaling laws of feedback bits for channels, precoding, and decoding vectors to obtain full degree of freedom are derived, which are backward compatible to the existing results for quantized CSI only or quantized precoder only. Simulation results show that the system is interference limited at a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) if the three scaling laws are not simultaneously satisfied, and the throughput performance is dominantly limited by the worst feedback links among the channels, precoders, and decoders.

[1]  Nihar Jindal MIMO broadcast channels with finite rate feedback , 2005, GLOBECOM.

[2]  S. Jafar,et al.  Degrees of freedom of the K user MIMO interference channel , 2008, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[3]  A. H. Kayran,et al.  On Feasibility of Interference Alignment in MIMO Interference Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[4]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Multi-Antenna Downlink Channels with Limited Feedback and User Selection , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Approaching the Capacity of Wireless Networks through Distributed Interference Alignment , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[6]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  The Feasibility Conditions for Interference Alignment in MIMO Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Interference Alignment and Degrees of Freedom of the $K$-User Interference Channel , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Lin Tian,et al.  Spectral - and energy-efficient two-stage cooperative multicast for LTE-advanced and beyond , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[9]  Carlos Beltrán,et al.  Finding the number of feasible solutions for linear interference alignment problems , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[10]  Liangzhong Ruan,et al.  Limited Feedback Design for Interference Alignment on MIMO Interference Networks With Heterogeneous Path Loss and Spatial Correlations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Degrees of Freedom of the K User M times N MIMO Interference Channel , 2008, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Mahesh K. Varanasi,et al.  Interference Alignment Under Limited Feedback for MIMO Interference Channels , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Cooperative Algorithms for MIMO Interference Channels , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[14]  Aria Nosratinia,et al.  Adaptive Interference Alignment with CSI Uncertainty , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  Vincent K. N. Lau,et al.  Feedback-Topology Designs for Interference Alignment in MIMO Interference Channels , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Helmut Bölcskei,et al.  Interference alignment with limited feedback , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.