The digital literacy debate: an investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology

Research suggests students' use of information and communication technology (ICT) may be more a matter of digital literacy and access rather than a generational trait. We sought to identify ICT preferences of post-secondary students (N = 580) through a Digital Propensity Index (DPI), investigating communication methods, Internet practices and the creation of online content. Age, gender and socioeconomic status were examined as factors which might explain why students use ICT. Results suggest age is a factor in ICT use but that it is not the most important consideration; the gender gap and gaps between socioeconomic groups in terms of ICT use may be closing. The findings raise a variety of implications for institutions training pre-service teachers, curriculum developers designing instructional materials and educational leaders developing ICT policy for schools.

[1]  M. Prensky Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[2]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  The digital native - myth and reality , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[3]  Toni Downes,et al.  Blending play, practice and performance: children's use of the computer at home , 2009 .

[4]  A. Margaryan,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality?: Students’ use of technologies for learning , 2008 .

[5]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  J. Palfrey,et al.  Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives , 2009, Choice Reviews Online.

[7]  Erica Mcwilliam Against professional development , 2002 .

[8]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[9]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[10]  V. Rideout,et al.  Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds , 2010 .

[11]  T. Judd,et al.  First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? , 2008 .

[12]  N. Howe,et al.  Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation , 2000 .

[13]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Educating the Net Generation , 2005 .

[14]  Andrew Keen,et al.  Book Review: Andrew Keen, The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy. London and Boston, MA: Currency/Doubleday, 2007. 228 pp. ISBN 0—3855—2080—8, $22.95 (pbk) , 2008, New Media Soc..

[15]  Sandra Galindo Palfrey, J.; Gasser, U. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York, NY: Basic books, 2008 , 2009 .

[16]  Charles K. Kinzer,et al.  Questioning Assumptions about Students' Expectations for Technology in College Classrooms , 2007 .

[17]  Charles D. Dziuban,et al.  Ensuring the Net Generation Is Net Savvy , 2006 .

[18]  David Norman,et al.  Predicting The Performance Of Interpreting Instruction Based On Digital Propensity Index Score In Text And Graphic Formats , 2008 .

[19]  Magdalena Bober,et al.  Taking up Online Opportunities? Children's Uses of the Internet for Education, Communication and Participation , 2004 .

[20]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  Growing up digital , 2020, Transformative Digital Humanities.