Feasibility of myocardial perfusion imaging with half the radiation dose in obese patients using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery software

BackgroundWe previously described the feasibility of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with nearly half the radiation dose using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery (OSEM-RR) processing. This study sought to determine if the findings can be expanded to obese patients.MethodsFifty obese patients (>100 kg) referred for MPI underwent stress-rest or rest-stress studies with a half dose of Tc-99m sestamibi in a 1-day protocol using OSEM-RR processing. Image quality and clinical results were compared with matched patients (by age, sex, weight, presence/probability of coronary artery disease) evaluated with standard “full-dose” Tc-99m sestamibi, mostly in a 2-day protocol. Dose activities were adjusted individually by weight.ResultsMean Tc-99m activity was 33.4 ± 13.9 mCi in the half-dose group and 60 ± 10 mCi in the full-dose group (P < .0001). Respective mean effective doses per study were 10 ± 4 and 18 ± 3 mSv (P < .0001). Overall image quality was good-to-excellent in 94% of the half-dose group and 80% of the full-dose group (P < .045). There was no between-group difference in rate or size of ischemia or infarction, except for stress left ventricular ejection fraction.ConclusionsMPI with half the radiation dose is feasible in obese patients. Image quality is better than for full-dose MPI, and the procedure can be performed in 1 day.

[1]  J. E. Hansen,et al.  Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1. , 2001, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[2]  J. Valentin,et al.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: (Addendum 2 to ICRP Publication 53) ICRP Publication 80 Approved by the Commission in September 1997 , 1998, Annals of the ICRP.

[3]  Mouaz Al-Mallah,et al.  ASNC IMAGING GUIDELINES FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES Single photon-emission computed tomography , 2010 .

[4]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Edward P. Ficaro,et al.  Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  Importance of consideration of radiation doses from cardiac imaging procedures and risks of cancer , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[7]  Linda K. Shaw,et al.  Clinical results of a novel wide beam reconstruction method for shortening scan time of Tc-99m cardiac SPECT perfusion studies , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion spect interpretation , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[9]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  N. Zafrir,et al.  Feasibility of myocardial perfusion imaging with half the radiation dose using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery software , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  E. Gordon DePuey,et al.  A comparison of the image quality of full-time myocardial perfusion SPECT vs wide beam reconstruction half-time and half-dose SPECT , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[12]  R. Hendel,et al.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology review of the ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomograph myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[13]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging , 2007, Circulation.

[14]  Myocardial perfusion scans. , 2013, Australian family physician.

[15]  D. Berman,et al.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Associa , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  B. Zaret,et al.  Wintergreen panel summaries , 1999 .

[17]  M. Henzlova,et al.  Reduced isotope dose with rapid SPECT MPI imaging: Initial experience with a CZT SPECT camera , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  E. Gordon DePuey,et al.  Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction “half-time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: A comparison to “full-time” filtered backprojection , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[19]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[20]  Kwang-Pyo Kim,et al.  Myocardial Perfusion Scans: Projected Population Cancer Risks From Current Levels of Use in the United States , 2010, Circulation.

[21]  T. Ruddy,et al.  Half-Time SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Attenuation Correction , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.