Quasiconvex Optimization for Robust Geometric Reconstruction

Geometric reconstruction problems in computer vision are often solved by minimizing a cost function that combines the reprojection errors in the 2D images. In this paper, we show that, for various geometric reconstruction problems, their reprojection error functions share a common and quasiconvex formulation. Based on the quasiconvexity, we present a novel quasiconvex optimization framework in which the geometric reconstruction problems are formulated as a small number of small-scale convex programs that are readily solvable. Our final reconstruction algorithm is simple and has intuitive geometric interpretation. In contrast to existing local minimization approaches, our algorithm is deterministic and guarantees a predefined accuracy of the minimization result. The quasiconvexity also provides an intuitive method to handle directional uncertainties and outliers in measurements. For a large-scale problem or in a situation where computational resources are constrained, we provide an efficient approximation that gives a good upper bound (but not global minimum) on the reconstruction error. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm by experiments on both synthetic and real data.

[1]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  Determining the Epipolar Geometry and its Uncertainty: A Review , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[2]  Kiriakos N. Kutulakos,et al.  A Theory of Shape by Space Carving , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[4]  Long Quan,et al.  Linear N/spl ges/4-point pose determination , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[5]  John Oliensis Exact Two-Image Structure from Motion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Bundle Adjustment - A Modern Synthesis , 1999, Workshop on Vision Algorithms.

[7]  Richard I. Hartley,et al.  L-8Minimization in Geometric Reconstruction Problems , 2004, CVPR.

[8]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Quasiconvex Optimization for Robust Geometric Reconstruction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Uncertainty Models in Quasiconvex Optimization for Geometric Reconstruction , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[10]  Frederik Schaffalitzky,et al.  How hard is 3-view triangulation really? , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[11]  Richard I. Hartley,et al.  Multiple-View Geometry Under the {$L_\infty$}-Norm , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  R. Hartley,et al.  L/sub /spl infin// minimization in geometric reconstruction problems , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[13]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  MLESAC: A New Robust Estimator with Application to Estimating Image Geometry , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[14]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method , 1992, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Jos F. Sturm,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones , 1999 .

[16]  P. Anandan,et al.  Factorization with Uncertainty , 2000, ECCV.

[17]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Sequential Updating of Projective and Affine Structure from Motion , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Image-based interactive exploration of real-world environments , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[19]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  High-quality Image-based Interactive Exploration of Real-World Environments 1 , 2003 .

[20]  David Nister,et al.  Automatic Dense Reconstruction from Uncalibrated Video Sequences , 2001 .

[21]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  A unified factorization algorithm for points, line segments and planes with uncertainty models , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[22]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Review and analysis of solutions of the three point perspective pose estimation problem , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  Epipolar Constraints for Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation , 2005, 2005 Seventh IEEE Workshops on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV/MOTION'05) - Volume 1.

[24]  Fredrik Kahl,et al.  Multiple view geometry and the L/sub /spl infin//-norm , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[25]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[26]  Christopher O. Jaynes,et al.  Feature uncertainty arising from covariant image noise , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).