Stoichiometry of microbial carbon use efficiency in soils

The carbon use efficiency (CUE) of microbial communities partitions the flow of C from primary producers to the atmosphere, decomposer food webs, and soil C stores. CUE, usually defined as the ratio of growth to assimilation, is a critical parameter in ecosystem models, but is seldom measured directly in soils because of the methodological difficulty of measuring in situ rates of microbial growth and respiration. Alternatively, CUE can be estimated indirectly from the elemental stoichiometry of organic matter and microbial biomass, and the ratios of C to nutrient-acquiring ecoenzymatic activities. We used this approach to estimate and compare microbial CUE in >2000 soils from a broad range of ecosystems. Mean CUE based on C:N stoichiometry was 0.269 ± 0.110 (mean ± SD). A parallel calculation based on C:P stoichiometry yielded a mean CUE estimate of 0.252 ± 0.125. The mean values and frequency distributions were similar to those from aquatic ecosystems, also calculated from stoichiometric models, and to those calculated from direct measurements of bacterial and fungal growth and respiration. CUE was directly related to microbial biomass C with a scaling exponent of 0.304 (95% CI 0.237–0.371) and inversely related to microbial biomass P with a scaling exponent of −0.234 (95% CI −0.289 to −0.179). Relative to CUE, biomass specific turnover time increased with a scaling exponent of 0.509 (95% CI 0.467–0.551). CUE increased weakly with mean annual temperature. CUE declined with increasing soil pH reaching a minimum at pH 7.0, then increased again as soil pH approached 9.0, a pattern consistent with pH trends in the ratio of fungal : bacteria abundance and growth. Structural equation models that related geographic variables to CUE component variables showed the strongest connections for paths linking latitude and pH to β-glucosidase activity and soil C:N:P ratios. The integration of stoichiometric and metabolic models provides a quantitative description of the functional organization of soil microbial communities that can improve the representation of CUE in microbial process and ecosystem simulation models.

[1]  J. Powers,et al.  Scale-dependent variation in nitrogen cycling and soil fungal communities along gradients of forest composition and age in regenerating tropical dry forests. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[2]  W. Wanek,et al.  The application of ecological stoichiometry to plant–microbial–soil organic matter transformations , 2015 .

[3]  J. Blanchard,et al.  Long-term forest soil warming alters microbial communities in temperate forest soils , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[4]  Zsuzsanna Gyorfy,et al.  Engineered ribosomal RNA operon copy-number variants of E. coli reveal the evolutionary trade-offs shaping rRNA operon number , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Seasonal changes in soil organic matter after a decade of nutrient addition in a lowland tropical forest , 2015, Biogeochemistry.

[6]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Scaling microbial biomass, metabolism and resource supply , 2015, Biogeochemistry.

[7]  M. Spohn.  Microbial respiration per unit microbial biomass depends on litter layer carbon-to-nitrogen ratio , 2014 .

[8]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Extracellular enzyme kinetics scale with resource availability , 2014, Biogeochemistry.

[9]  S. Allison,et al.  Elemental stoichiometry of Fungi and Bacteria strains from grassland leaf litter , 2014 .

[10]  J. Meyer-Fernandes,et al.  Inorganic phosphate uptake in unicellular eukaryotes. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[11]  W. Wanek,et al.  Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon:nitrogen imbalances regulates soil nitrogen cycling , 2014, Nature Communications.

[12]  K. Peay,et al.  Endemism and functional convergence across the North American soil mycobiome , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay , 2014, Ecology letters.

[14]  T. Schmidt,et al.  Bacterial growth efficiency varies in soils under different land management practices , 2014 .

[15]  E. Seibert,et al.  Fundamentals of enzyme kinetics. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[16]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Calculating co-metabolic costs of lignin decay and their impacts on carbon use efficiency , 2013 .

[17]  Stefano Manzoni,et al.  Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modelling. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[18]  T. Crowther,et al.  Carbon use efficiency and storage in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[19]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems , 2013 .

[20]  B. Buatois,et al.  An experimental test of the hypothesis of non-homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant litter-microbe system. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[21]  K. Denef,et al.  The Microbial Efficiency‐Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? , 2013, Global change biology.

[22]  R. Wagai,et al.  Linking temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition to its molecular structure, accessibility, and microbial physiology , 2013, Global change biology.

[23]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  Roots and Associated Fungi Drive Long-Term Carbon Sequestration in Boreal Forest , 2013, Science.

[24]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions , 2013 .

[25]  M. Bradford,et al.  Empirical evidence that soil carbon formation from plant inputs is positively related to microbial growth , 2013, Biogeochemistry.

[26]  F. Ballantyne,et al.  How interactions between microbial resource demands, soil organic matter stoichiometry, and substrate reactivity determine the direction and magnitude of soil respiratory responses to warming , 2013, Global change biology.

[27]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial nutrient acquisition in tropical soils , 2013, Biogeochemistry.

[28]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  The response of microbial biomass and hydrolytic enzymes to a decade of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium addition in a lowland tropical rain forest , 2013, Biogeochemistry.

[29]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Ecoenzymatic Stoichiometry and Ecological Theory , 2012 .

[30]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[31]  D. Moorhead,et al.  A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition , 2012 .

[32]  J. Belnap,et al.  Microbial colonization and controls in dryland systems , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[33]  B. Hill,et al.  Microbial enzyme stoichiometry and nutrient limitation in US streams and rivers , 2012 .

[34]  Bettina M. J. Engelbrecht,et al.  Soil organic phosphorus in lowland tropical rain forests , 2011 .

[35]  C. Plassard,et al.  Diversity in phosphorus mobilisation and uptake in ectomycorrhizal fungi , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[36]  M. Strickland,et al.  Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils – Methods, controls, and ecosystem implications , 2010 .

[37]  Dolors Vaqué,et al.  Warming effects on marine microbial food web processes: how far can we go when it comes to predictions? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  P. Brookes,et al.  Investigating the mechanisms for the opposing pH relationships of fungal and bacterial growth in soil , 2010 .

[39]  S. Hobbie,et al.  The effects of substrate composition, quantity, and diversity on microbial activity , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[40]  J. Stegen,et al.  Integrating elements and energy through the metabolic dependencies of gross growth efficiency and the threshold elemental ratio , 2010 .

[41]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Soil organic phosphorus dynamics following perturbation of litter cycling in a tropical moist forest , 2010 .

[42]  Stephen Porder,et al.  Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[43]  A. P. Allen,et al.  Towards an integration of ecological stoichiometry and the metabolic theory of ecology to better understand nutrient cycling. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[44]  S. Allison,et al.  Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[45]  Christian L. Lauber,et al.  The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types , 2008 .

[46]  C. Cleveland,et al.  C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? , 2007 .

[47]  M. Loreau,et al.  Stoichiometric Constraints on Resource Use, Competitive Interactions, and Elemental Cycling in Microbial Decomposers , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[48]  A. Lopez-Urrutia,et al.  Resource limitation of bacterial production distorts the temperature dependence of oceanic carbon cycling. , 2007, Ecology.

[49]  Takehito Yoshida,et al.  Threshold elemental ratios of carbon and phosphorus in aquatic consumers. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[50]  E. Davidson,et al.  On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10 , 2006 .

[51]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Microbial Community Responses to Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Enrichment in a Warm-Temperate Forest , 2006, Ecosystems.

[52]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs , 2005 .

[53]  T. Schmidt,et al.  Life History Implications of rRNA Gene Copy Number in Escherichia coli , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[54]  T. Daufresne,et al.  SCALING OF C:N:P STOICHIOMETRY IN FORESTS WORLDWIDE: IMPLICATIONS OF TERRESTRIAL REDFIELD‐TYPE RATIOS , 2004 .

[55]  P. Reich,et al.  Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  J. Elser,et al.  Growth rate–stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota , 2003 .

[57]  J. Elser,et al.  Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere , 2002 .