Influence of touching an object on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery

We investigated whether corticospinal excitability during the imagery of an action involving an external object was influenced by actually touching the object. Corticospinal excitability was assessed by monitoring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the first dorsal interosseous muscle following transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex during imagery of squeezing a ball—with or without passively holding the ball. The MEPs amplitude during imagery when the ball was held was larger than that when the ball was not held. The MEPs amplitude was not modulated just by holding the ball. In the same experimental condition, the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in response to the stimulation of median nerve were not modulated by motor imagery or by holding the ball. These results suggest that the corticospinal excitability during imagery of squeezing a ball is enhanced with the real touch of the ball, and the enhancement would be caused by some changes along the corticospinal pathway itself and not by the change in responsiveness along the afferent pathway to the primary somatosensory cortex.

[1]  T. Kasai,et al.  Facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle is dependent on different motor images. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  I Know What You Are Doing A Neurophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Eric L. Amazeen,et al.  Peripheral neuropathy and object length perception by effortful (dynamic) touch: A case study , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  Koji Inui,et al.  Mechanisms of Differences in Gating Effects on Short- and Long-Latency Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Relating to Movement , 2004, Brain Topography.

[6]  R Kakigi,et al.  Effects on median nerve SEPs of tactile stimulation applied to adjacent and remote areas of the body surface. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  T. Kasai,et al.  Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery , 1997, Brain Research.

[9]  Stephen J. Jones,et al.  Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve. A review of scalp and intracranial recordings. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  Giovanni Buccino,et al.  Corticospinal excitability is speci _ cally modulated by motor imagery ] a magnetic stimulation study , 1998 .

[11]  B Dan,et al.  Sensory and motor interfering influences on somatosensory evoked potentials. , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[12]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Human inferior parietal cortex ‘programs’ the action class of grasping , 2000, Cognitive Systems Research.

[14]  G Cheron,et al.  Mental movement simulation affects the N30 frontal component of the somatosensory evoked potential. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  G Cheron,et al.  Gating of the early components of the frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials in different sensory-motor interference modalities. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  J. C. Rothwell,et al.  Dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  L. Craighero,et al.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Lumy Sawaki,et al.  Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Mark L Latash,et al.  Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  Anne R. Isaac,et al.  Mental practice: Does it work in the field? , 1992 .

[21]  R. Passingham,et al.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  I. Robertson,et al.  Measuring motor imagery ability: A review , 2008 .

[24]  T. S. Miles,et al.  Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Salvatore M Aglioti,et al.  Kinesthetic imagery and tool-specific modulation of corticospinal representations in expert tennis players. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  P Jenmalm,et al.  Visual and tactile information about object-curvature control fingertip forces and grasp kinematics in human dexterous manipulation. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  J Paillard,et al.  Vision without proprioception modulates cortico-spinal excitability during hand motor imagery. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  L. Craighero,et al.  The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.