Parameter-Based Performance Analysis of Object-Based Image Analysis Using Aerial and Quikbird-2 Images

Opening new possibilities for research, very high resolution (VHR) imagery acquired by recent commercial satellites and aerial systems requires advanced approaches and techniques that can handle large volume of data with high local variance. Delineation of land use/cover information from VHR images is a hot research topic in remote sensing. In recent years, object-based image analysis (OBIA) has become a popular solution for image analysis tasks as it considers shape, texture and content information associated with the image objects. The most important stage of OBIA is the image segmentation process applied prior to classification. Determination of optimal segmentation parameters is of crucial importance for the performance of the selected classifier. In this study, effectiveness and applicability of the segmentation method in relation to its parameters was analysed using two VHR images, an aerial photo and a Quickbird-2 image. Multi-resolution segmentation technique was employed with its optimal parameters of scale, shape and compactness that were defined after an extensive trail process on the data sets. Nearest neighbour classifier was applied on the segmented images, and then the accuracy assessment was applied. Results show that segmentation parameters have a direct effect on the classification accuracy, and low values of scale-shape combinations produce the highest classification accuracies. Also, compactness parameter was found to be having minimal effect on the construction of image objects, hence it can be set to a constant value in image classification.

[1]  Konstantinos Karantzalos,et al.  Object-based image analysis through nonlinear scale-space filtering , 2011 .

[2]  Marina Mueller,et al.  Edge- and region-based segmentation technique for the extraction of large, man-made objects in high-resolution satellite imagery , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Mingjun Song,et al.  A competitive pixel-object approach for land cover classification , 2005 .

[4]  R. C. Frohn,et al.  Segmentation and object-oriented classification of wetlands in a karst Florida landscape using multi-season Landsat-7 ETM+ imagery , 2011 .

[5]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Image Segmentation Methods for Object-based Analysis and Classification , 2004 .

[6]  Peter Reinartz,et al.  Combined Edge Segment Texture Analysis for the Detection of Damaged Buildings in Crisis Areas , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Forest Type Mapping using Object-specific Texture Measures from Multispectral Ikonos Imagery: Segmentation Quality and Image Classification Issues , 2009 .

[8]  Tung Fung,et al.  Object‐oriented classification for urban land cover mapping with ASTER imagery , 2007 .

[9]  P. Hofmann,et al.  Detecting informal settlements from QuickBird data in Rio de Janeiro using an object based approach , 2008 .

[10]  S. M. Jong,et al.  The Importance of Scale in Object-based Mapping of Vegetation Parameters with Hyperspectral Imagery , 2007 .

[11]  T. Warner,et al.  Multi-scale GEOBIA with very high spatial resolution digital aerial imagery: scale, texture and image objects , 2011 .

[12]  Taskin Kavzoglu,et al.  Increasing the accuracy of neural network classification using refined training data , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .

[14]  Eléonore Wolff,et al.  Segmentation of very high spatial resolution satellite images in urban areas for segment-based classification , 2005 .

[15]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision , 1993, Springer US.

[16]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[17]  G. Schaab,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF PARAMETER SETTINGS FOR MULTILEVEL IMAGE SEGMENTATION IN GEOBIA , 2009 .

[18]  M. Neubert,et al.  Enhanced evaluation of image segmentation results , 2010 .

[19]  Xulin Guo,et al.  Detecting an Optimal Scale Parameter in Object-Oriented Classification , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Soe W. Myint,et al.  Comparison of Remote Sensing Image Processing Techniques to Identify Tornado Damage Areas from Landsat TM Data , 2008, Sensors.

[21]  Guofan Shao,et al.  Object-oriented classification of land use/cover using digital aerial orthophotography , 2012 .

[22]  Patricia Gober,et al.  Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery , 2011, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[23]  Jie Tian,et al.  Optimization in multi‐scale segmentation of high‐resolution satellite images for artificial feature recognition , 2007 .

[24]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[25]  M. Neubert,et al.  A COMPARISON OF SEGMENTATION PROGRAMS FOR HIGH RESOLUTION REMOTE SENSING DATA , 2004 .

[26]  Albert Rango,et al.  Texture and Scale in Object-Based Analysis of Subdecimeter Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Fan Xia,et al.  Assessing object-based classification: advantages and limitations , 2009 .

[28]  Norman Kerle,et al.  Optimized image segmentation and its effect on classification accuracy , 2007 .

[29]  R. Reulke,et al.  Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2005 .