Personalized Fundraising: A Field Experiment on Threshold Matching of Donations

While increasing the number of small donors, standard linear matching schemes have been shown to cause considerable crowding out in charitable giving with pronounced effects on large gifts. We propose a form of threshold matching where donations above a certain, potentially personalized, threshold are topped up with a fixed amount. We show theoretically that threshold matching can induce crowd-ing in if appropriately personalized. In a field experiment, we explore how thresholds should be chosen depending on past donations. We find that the opti-mal choice of thresholds is rather bold, approximately 60-75% above past dona-tions. Additionally, we explore how thresholds should be set for new donors as a function of their personal characteristics and demonstrate the benefits of person-alization as opposed to setting general thresholds applying to all recipients of a fundraising call.

[1]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[2]  David Lucking-Reiley,et al.  The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Opening a donor's wallet: : The influence of appeal scales on likelihood and magnitude of donation , 2013 .

[4]  Steffen Huck,et al.  Matched Fundraising: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Round Giving: A Field Experiment on Suggested Donation Amounts in Public‐Television Fundraising , 2018, Economic Inquiry.

[6]  J. Oechssler,et al.  The conditional contribution mechanism for repeated public goods - The general case , 2022, J. Econ. Theory.

[7]  Ark Fangzhou Zhang,et al.  Motivating Contributions to Public Information Goods : A Personalized Field Experiment on Wikipedia 1 , 2018 .

[8]  B. Beersma,et al.  Look to others before you leap: A Systematic Literature Review of Social Information Effects on Charitable Giving , 2018 .

[9]  Testing consumer theory: evidence from a natural field experiment , 2017, Journal of the Economic Science Association.

[10]  James Andreoni,et al.  Leadership giving in charitable fund-raising , 2006 .

[11]  Stephan Meier,et al.  Do Subsidies Increase Charitable Giving in the Long Run? Matching Donations in a Field Experiment , 2006 .

[12]  Elizabeth A. Keenan,et al.  Avoiding overhead aversion in charity , 2014, Science.

[13]  Ragan Petrie,et al.  Optimal Incentives to Give , 2020, AEA Randomized Controlled Trials.

[14]  A. Falk,et al.  Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  S. Huck,et al.  Charitable Giving by the Poor a Field Experiment on Matching and Distance to Charitable Output in Kyrgyzstan , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch,et al.  Beliefs as a Means of Self-Control? Evidence from a Dynamic Student Survey , 2018 .

[17]  H. Rosen,et al.  Notches , 1984 .

[18]  James Edwards,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHY SUGGESTIONS WORK IN CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING: THEORY AND EVIDENCE FROM A NATURAL FIELD EXPERIMENT , 2013 .

[19]  Gary Charness,et al.  Charity in the Laboratory: Matching, Competition, and Group Identity , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Round Giving : A Field Experiment on Suggested Charitable Donation Amounts in Public Television , 2017 .

[21]  F. Feinberg,et al.  Modeling and Measuring Scale Attraction Effects: An Application to Charitable Donations , 2017 .

[22]  Steffen Huck,et al.  Charitable Giving and Nonbinding Contribution-Level Suggestions: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2014 .

[23]  Personalized Fundraising: A Field Experiment on Threshold Matching of Donations , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  S. Huck,et al.  Can Mass Fundraising Harm Your Core Business? A Field Experiment on How Fundraising Affects Ticket Sales , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Inácio Bó,et al.  Hiring from a Pool of Workers , 2020, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

[26]  Steffen Huck,et al.  Online Fundraising, Self-Image, and the Long-Term Impact of Ask Avoidance , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[27]  René Bekkers,et al.  A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy , 2010 .

[28]  Dean S. Karlan,et al.  Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment , 2006 .

[29]  Jeevant Rampal,et al.  Contests within and between groups , 2019 .

[30]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[31]  M. Wilhelm,et al.  Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[32]  Lise Vesterlund,et al.  The informational value of sequential fundraising , 2003 .

[33]  Steffen Huck,et al.  Comparing Charitable Fundraising Schemes: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment and a Structural Model , 2013 .

[34]  Laura K. Gee,et al.  Do Beliefs About Peers Matter for Donation Matching? Experiments in the Field and Laboratory , 2016, Games Econ. Behav..

[35]  Steffen Huck,et al.  Transactions Costs in Charitable Giving: Evidence from Two Field Experiments , 2010 .

[36]  Dorothea Kübler,et al.  Experiments On Matching Markets: A Survey , 2019 .

[37]  Robert McClelland,et al.  SEQUENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS , 2007 .

[38]  L. Gangadharan,et al.  Charitable Giving and Intermediation , 2015 .

[39]  John A. List,et al.  Matching and challenge gifts to charity: evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[40]  S. Huck,et al.  Matching Donations Without Crowding Out? Some Theoretical Considerations, a Field, and a Lab Experiment , 2017 .

[41]  S. Huck,et al.  Giving once, giving twice: A two-period field experiment on intertemporal crowding in charitable giving , 2019, Journal of Public Economics.

[42]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Subsidizing unit donations: matches, rebates, and discounts compared , 2018, Experimental Economics.

[43]  Jonathan Meer,et al.  Does Fundraising Create New Giving? , 2016 .

[44]  Kurt P. Munz,et al.  Name Similarity Encourages Generosity: A Field Experiment in Email Personalization , 2020, Mark. Sci..