Evaluating vaccination strategies to control foot-and-mouth disease: a model comparison study

SUMMARY Simulation models can offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of different control strategies and act as important decision support tools when comparing and evaluating outbreak scenarios and control strategies. An international modelling study was performed to compare a range of vaccination strategies in the control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). Modelling groups from five countries (Australia, New Zealand, USA, UK, The Netherlands) participated in the study. Vaccination is increasingly being recognized as a potentially important tool in the control of FMD, although there is considerable uncertainty as to how and when it should be used. We sought to compare model outputs and assess the effectiveness of different vaccination strategies in the control of FMD. Using a standardized outbreak scenario based on data from an FMD exercise in the UK in 2010, the study showed general agreement between respective models in terms of the effectiveness of vaccination. Under the scenario assumptions, all models demonstrated that vaccination with ‘stamping-out’ of infected premises led to a significant reduction in predicted epidemic size and duration compared to the ‘stamping-out’ strategy alone. For all models there were advantages in vaccinating cattle-only rather than all species, using 3-km vaccination rings immediately around infected premises, and starting vaccination earlier in the control programme. This study has shown that certain vaccination strategies are robust even to substantial differences in model configurations. This result should increase end-user confidence in conclusions drawn from model outputs. These results can be used to support and develop effective policies for FMD control.

[1]  R. Huirne,et al.  A decision-tree to optimise control measures during the early stage of a foot-and-mouth disease epidemic. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[2]  R. Paskin,et al.  Estimating Resource Requirements to Staff a Response to a Medium to Large Outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease in Australia. , 2016, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[3]  H J W van Roermund,et al.  Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease I: epidemiological consequences. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[4]  Michael P Ward,et al.  Simulation of foot-and-mouth disease spread within an integrated livestock system in Texas, USA. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[5]  M. G. Garner,et al.  How do resources influence control measures during a simulated outbreak of foot and mouth disease in Australia? , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[6]  R S Morris,et al.  InterSpread Plus: a spatial and stochastic simulation model of disease in animal populations. , 2013, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[7]  Samuel Soubeyrand,et al.  A Bayesian Inference Framework to Reconstruct Transmission Trees Using Epidemiological and Genetic Data , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  K Owen,et al.  Foot and mouth disease model verification and 'relative validation' through a formal model comparison. , 2011, Revue scientifique et technique.

[9]  K Owen,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of the New Zealand standard model of foot and mouth disease. , 2011, Revue scientifique et technique.

[10]  Graeme Garner,et al.  Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease--model intercomparison. , 2008, Veterinary journal.

[11]  H. Akashi.  The 2010 Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreakin Miyazaki Prefecture , 2012 .

[12]  R L Sanson,et al.  A comparison of predictions made by three simulation models of foot-and-mouth disease , 2007, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[13]  A. Hill,et al.  The North American Animal Disease Spread Model: a simulation model to assist decision making in evaluating animal disease incursions. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[14]  R. May,et al.  Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease , 2003, Nature.

[15]  M. D. Jong,et al.  Mathematical modelling in veterinary epidemiology: why model building is important , 1995 .

[16]  L. Christiansen,et al.  Comparing control strategies against foot-and-mouth disease: will vaccination be cost-effective in Denmark? , 2013, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[17]  J. W. Wilesmith,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[18]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[19]  Michael J. Tildesley,et al.  Adaptive Management and the Value of Information: Learning Via Intervention in Epidemiology , 2014, PLoS biology.

[20]  J.A. Backer,et al.  Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease II: Regaining FMD-free status. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[21]  R. Kitching,et al.  Use and abuse of mathematical models: an illustration from the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom. , 2006, Revue scientifique et technique.

[22]  M. Thrusfield,et al.  Destructive tension: mathematics versus experience--the progress and control of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain. , 2011, Revue scientifique et technique.

[23]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[24]  Rob Deardon,et al.  Optimal reactive vaccination strategies for a foot-and-mouth outbreak in the UK , 2006, Nature.

[25]  Valerie Isham,et al.  Stochastic Models for Epidemics with Special Reference to AIDS , 1993 .

[26]  M. G. Garner,et al.  Early Decision Indicators for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreaks in Non-Endemic Countries , 2016, Front. Vet. Sci..

[27]  K. Sakamoto.  Mechanism of FMD Outbreaks and its Control in Asian Region , 2012 .

[28]  M G Garner,et al.  Principles of epidemiological modelling. , 2011, Revue scientifique et technique.

[29]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R , 2005 .

[30]  Heinzpeter Schwermer,et al.  Evaluation of the benefit of emergency vaccination in a foot-and-mouth disease free country with low livestock density. , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[31]  R S Morris,et al.  Decision-support tools for foot and mouth disease control. , 2002, Revue scientifique et technique.

[32]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[33]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[34]  G. Roberts,et al.  Predicting undetected infections during the 2007 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[35]  Matthew J Ferrari,et al.  Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter. , 2016, Epidemics.

[36]  J. Krieter,et al.  Consideration of different outbreak conditions in the evaluation of preventive culling and emergency vaccination to control foot and mouth disease epidemics. , 2011, Research in veterinary science.

[37]  R. Kitching,et al.  Aspects of emergency vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease. , 2002, Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases.

[38]  M. G. Garner,et al.  Modelling the spread of foot-and-mouth disease in Australia. , 2005, Australian veterinary journal.

[39]  G. Schuepbach-Regula,et al.  Evidence for Emergency Vaccination Having Played a Crucial Role to Control the 1965/66 Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak in Switzerland , 2015, Front. Vet. Sci..

[40]  R L Sanson,et al.  Simulation modelling of a hypothetical introduction of foot-and-mouth disease into Alberta. , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[41]  M. Woolhouse,et al.  Vaccination against Foot-And-Mouth Disease: Do Initial Conditions Affect Its Benefit? , 2013, PloS one.