Model composition for biological mathematical systems

Mathematical models are frequently used to model biological process, such as cardiac electrophysiological systems. In order to separate the models from the implementations, and to facilitate curation, domain specific languages (DSLs) have become a popular and effective means of specifying models (Lloyd et al., 2004; Hucka et al., 2004). In previous papers (Gill et al., 2012a; Gill et al., 2012b; McKeever et al., 2013) we have argued for including parameterised modules as part of such DSLs. We presented our prototype Ode language and showed how models could be created in a generic fashion. In this paper we extend our work with concrete examples and simulation results. We show how complex heart models can be constructed by aggregation, encapsulation and subtyping. Our use-case retraces the steps taken by (Niederer et al., 2009), which investigated the common history between cardiac models, and shows how they can be cast in our language to be reused and extended. Our DSL enables ‘physiological model engineering’ through the development of generic modules exploiting high cohesion and low coupling.

[1]  Sarah M. Keating,et al.  Evolving a lingua franca and associated software infrastructure for computational systems biology: the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) project. , 2004, Systems biology.

[2]  David Gavaghan,et al.  Modules for Reusable and Collaborative Modelling of Biological Mathematical Systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[3]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990 .

[4]  Yoram Rudy,et al.  Simulation of the Undiseased Human Cardiac Ventricular Action Potential: Model Formulation and Experimental Validation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  A modular module system , 2000, J. Funct. Program..

[6]  Gary R. Mirams,et al.  High-throughput functional curation of cellular electrophysiology models. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[7]  C. Luo,et al.  A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. II. Afterdepolarizations, triggered activity, and potentiation. , 1994, Circulation research.

[8]  David Gavaghan,et al.  Modular mathematical modelling of biological systems , 2012, SpringSim.

[9]  Henk Barendregt,et al.  The Lambda Calculus: Its Syntax and Semantics , 1985 .

[10]  Denis Noble,et al.  Models of cardiac ventricular action potentials: iterative interaction between experiment and simulation , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Steve McKeever,et al.  Abstraction in physiological modelling languages , 2013, SpringSim.

[12]  Grady Booch,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications , 1990 .

[13]  Catherine M Lloyd,et al.  CellML: its future, present and past. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[14]  C. Luo,et al.  A model of the ventricular cardiac action potential. Depolarization, repolarization, and their interaction. , 1991, Circulation research.

[15]  G. W. Beeler,et al.  Reconstruction of the action potential of ventricular myocardial fibres , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  D Noble,et al.  A meta‐analysis of cardiac electrophysiology computational models , 2009, Experimental physiology.