Strategy selection in a task with spatial and nonspatial components: effects of fimbria-fornix lesions in rats.

The main purpose of the present research was to investigate the ability of rats to learn a 12-arm radial maze task that requires the concurrent utilization of both spatial and intramaze cue information. The task involves in a single trial both place and cue learning as well as reference memory (RM) and working memory (WM). Since the animal can choose place and cue arms in any order, the strategies employed to learn the task can be studied as well as the kinds of memory errors that are made. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the number of errors made on the place and cue components of the task did not differ, and that more RM than WM errors were made early during learning. As the task was learned, the animals tended to choose the place arms before choosing the intramaze cue arms, thus suggesting that a spatial strategy was employed first followed by a cue strategy. In Experiment 2 lesions of the fimbria-fornix resulted in temporary impairments in both RM and WM that were especially apparent on the spatial component of the task. The lesioned rats also switched from choosing mostly place arms early during the trial to choosing more cue arms. While fimbria-fornix lesioned rats recovered from the memory impairments with training, the change in response strategy persisted throughout postoperative testing. The procedure of combining both spatial and non-spatial components concurrently in the same task should prove of value in studying response strategies in animals.

[1]  I. Whishaw.  Cholinergic receptor blockade in the rat impairs locale but not taxon strategies for place navigation in a swimming pool. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[2]  S. Iversen,et al.  Handbook of Psychopharmacology , 1988, Springer US.

[3]  D. Olton,et al.  Neuroanatomical bases of spatial memory , 1980, Brain Research.

[4]  R. Morris,et al.  The Cholinergic Hypothesis of Memory: A Review of Animal Experiments , 1988 .

[5]  R. Morris,et al.  Lack of task specificity and absence of posttraining effects of atropine on learning. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  D. Olton,et al.  Animal Behavior Processes , 2022 .

[7]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[8]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Cholinergic blockade in the rat impairs strategy selection but not learning and retention of nonspatial visual discrimination problems in a swimming pool. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  M. M'Harzi,et al.  Selective lesions of the fimbria and the fornix in the rat: Differential effects on CA1 and dentate theta , 1985, Experimental Neurology.

[10]  R. Morris,et al.  Ibotenate Lesions of Hippocampus and/or Subiculum: Dissociating Components of Allocentric Spatial Learning , 1990, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  O Buresová,et al.  Differential effects of cholinergic blockade on performance of rats in the water tank navigation task and in a radial water maze. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  L. Nadel,et al.  Hippocampus: cognitive map or working memory? , 1980, Behavioral and neural biology.

[13]  G. Handelmann,et al.  Hippocampus, space, and memory , 1979 .

[14]  L. Jarrard.  Selective Hippocampal Lesions and Behavior: Implications for Current Research and Theorizing , 1986 .

[15]  J. Delacour,et al.  Effects of selective lesions of Fimbria-Fornix on learning set in the rat , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.

[16]  L. Jarrard,et al.  Selective hippocampal lesions and behavior: effects of kainic acid lesions on performance of place and cue tasks. , 1983, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  D. Olton,et al.  Spatial memory and hippocampal function , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  L. Jarrard,et al.  Selective hippocampal lesions: differential effects on performance by rats of a spatial task with preoperative versus postoperative training. , 1978, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[19]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[20]  L. Jarrard,et al.  Role of retroactive interference in the spatial memory of normal rats and rats with hippocampal lesions. , 1982, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  L. Jarrard,et al.  Acquisition of a complex place task in rats with selective ibotenate lesions of hippocampal formation: combined lesions of subiculum and entorhinal cortex versus hippocampus. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  Leonard E. Jarrard,et al.  On the role of hippocampal connections in the performance of place and cue tasks: comparisons with damage to hippocampus. , 1984 .