Handheld computers and the 21st century surgical team: a pilot study

BackgroundThe commercial development and expansion of mobile phone networks has led to the creation of devices combining mobile phones and personal digital assistants, which could prove invaluable in a clinical setting. This pilot study aimed to look at how one such device compared with the current pager system in facilitating inter-professional communication in a hospital clinical team.MethodsThe study looked at a heterogeneous team of doctors (n = 9) working in a busy surgical setting at St. Mary's Hospital in London and compared the use of a personal digital assistant with mobile phone and web-browsing facilities to the existing pager system. The primary feature of this device being compared to the conventional pager was its use as a mobile phone, but other features evaluated included the ability to access the internet, and reference data on the device. A crossover study was carried out for 6 weeks in 2004, with the team having access to the personal digital assistant every alternate week. The primary outcome measure for assessing efficiency of communication was the length of time it took for clinicians to respond to a call. We also sought to assess the ease of adoption of new technology by evaluating the perceptions of the team (n = 9) to personal digital assistants, by administering a questionnaire.ResultsDoctors equipped with a personal digital assistant rather than a pager, responded more quickly to a call and had a lower of failure to respond rate (RR: 0.44; 95%CI 0.20–0.93). Clinicians also found this technology easy to adopt as seen by a significant reduction in perceptions of nervousness to the technology over the six-week study period (mean (SD) week 1: 4.10 (SD 1.69) vs. mean (SD) week 6: 2.20 (1.99); p = 0.04).ConclusionThe results of this pilot study show the possible effects of replacing the current hospital pager with a newer, more technologically advanced device, and suggest that a combined personal digital assistant and mobile phone device may improve communication between doctors. In the light of these encouraging preliminary findings, we propose a large-scale clinical trial of the use of these devices in facilitating inter-professional communication in a hospital setting.

[1]  Alec Holt,et al.  Hand-held computers in healthcare: what software programs are available? , 2002, The New Zealand medical journal.

[2]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Use of mobile phones in hospital: time to lift the ban? , 2003, The Lancet.

[3]  A. McAlearney,et al.  Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Ibrahim Abubakar,et al.  Development and evaluation of a hand held computer based on-call pack for health protection out of hours duty: A pilot study , 2005, BMC public health.

[5]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  Personal digital educators. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002 , 2005 .

[7]  Susan Mayor NHS is failing to reap benefit of new technologies, MPs say , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Joseph J Morrissey,et al.  Mobile phones in the hospital: improved mobile communication and mitigation of EMI concerns can lead to an overall benefit to healthcare. , 2004, Health physics.

[9]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Mobile information and communication tools in the hospital , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Appa Rao Korukonda,et al.  An investigation of framing and scaling as confounding variables in information outcomes: The case of technophobia , 2003, Inf. Sci..

[11]  M. Humber National programme for information technology , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.