Culture, conformity, and carbon? A multi-country analysis of heating and cooling practices in office buildings

Abstract This study investigates human-building interaction in office spaces across multiple countries including Brazil, Italy, Poland, Switzerland, the United States, and Taiwan. We analyze social-psychological, contextual, and demographic factors to explain cross-country differences in adaptive thermal actions (i.e. cooling and heating behaviors) and conformity to the norms of sharing indoor environmental control features, an indicator of energy consumption. Specifically, personal adjustments such as putting on extra clothes are generally preferred over technological solutions such as adjusting thermostats in reaction to thermal discomfort. Social-psychological factors including attitudes, perceived behavioral control, injunctive norms, and perceived impact of indoor environmental quality on work productivity influence occupants’ intention to conform to the norms of sharing environmental control features. Lastly, accessibility to environmental control features, office type, gender, and age are also important factors. These findings demonstrate the roles of social-psychological and certain contextual factors in occupants’ interactions with building design as well as their behavior of sharing environmental control features, both of which significantly influence building energy consumption, and thus, broader decarbonization.

[1]  G. Johnson.  The essential impact of context on organizational behavior , 2006 .

[2]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Thermal comfort in offices in summer: Findings from a field study under the ‘setsuden’ conditions in Tokyo, Japan , 2013 .

[3]  P Pieter-Jan Hoes,et al.  User behavior in whole building simulation , 2009 .

[4]  H. Burak Gunay,et al.  The contextual factors contributing to occupants' adaptive comfort behaviors in offices – A review and proposed modeling framework , 2014 .

[5]  Jörn von Grabe,et al.  How do occupants decide their interactions with the building? From qualitative data to a psychological framework of human-building-interaction , 2016 .

[6]  K. Ohno.  Tracking Clean Energy Progress , 2021, Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan.

[7]  E. Ghisi,et al.  A field study about gender and thermal comfort temperatures in office buildings , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[8]  C. Stride,et al.  Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace , 2013 .

[9]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[10]  J L Schafer,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Multivariate Missing-Data Problems: A Data Analyst's Perspective. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[12]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Factors Related to Household Energy Use and Intention to Reduce It : The Role of Psychological and Socio-Demographic Variables , 2011 .

[13]  M. Cowles,et al.  On the Origins of the .05 Level of Statistical Significance , 1982 .

[14]  P. Gurian,et al.  Tracking the human-building interaction: A longitudinal field study of occupant behavior in air-conditioned offices , 2015 .

[15]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Field study of mixed-mode office buildings in Southern Brazil using an adaptive thermal comfort framework , 2018 .

[16]  S. Karjalainen.  Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments , 2007 .

[17]  B. Efron.  Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals , 1987 .

[18]  Murray Goulden,et al.  Intervening to change behaviour and save energy in the workplace: A systematic review of available evidence , 2016 .

[19]  Angela Lee,et al.  The impact of occupants’ behaviours on building energy analysis: A research review , 2017 .

[20]  Bjarne W. Olesen,et al.  Occupants' window opening behaviour: A literature review of factors influencing occupant behaviour and models , 2012 .

[21]  D. Rubin.  Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys , 1989 .

[22]  A. Bandura.  Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication , 2001 .

[23]  Roberto Lamberts,et al.  Development of envelope efficiency labels for commercial buildings: Effect of different variables on electricity consumption , 2008 .

[24]  Hiroshi Yoshino,et al.  IEA EBC annex 53: Total energy use in buildings—Analysis and evaluation methods , 2017 .

[25]  Roberto Lamberts,et al.  Building energy efficiency: An overview of the Brazilian residential labeling scheme , 2016 .

[26]  P. Stern.  What psychology knows about energy conservation. , 1992 .

[27]  David E. Gunderson,et al.  Understanding high performance buildings: The link between occupant knowledge of passive design systems, corresponding behaviors, occupant comfort and environmental satisfaction , 2015 .

[28]  Marcel Schweiker,et al.  Drivers of diversity in human thermal perception – A review for holistic comfort models , 2018, Temperature.

[29]  Runa Tabea Hellwig,et al.  Perceived control in indoor environments: a conceptual approach , 2015 .

[30]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics , 2017 .

[31]  Hisham Zerriffi,et al.  Three dimensional energy profile , 2011 .

[32]  Marcel Schweiker,et al.  Presenting LOBSTER, an innovative climate chamber, and the analysis of the effect of a ceiling fan on the thermal sensation and performance under summer conditions in an office-like setting , 2014 .

[33]  Alexander Rosemann,et al.  Sharing lighting control in an open office: Doing one's best to avoid conflict , 2019, Building and Environment.

[34]  T. Brown,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2006 .

[35]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Preferences for styles of negotiation: a comparison of Brazil and the U.S. , 1998 .

[36]  A. Mahdavi,et al.  IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings , 2017 .

[37]  Jörn von Grabe,et al.  The systematic identification and organization of the context of energy-relevant human interaction with buildings—a pilot study in Germany , 2016 .

[38]  Geun Young Yun,et al.  Influences of perceived control on thermal comfort and energy use in buildings , 2018 .

[39]  Anna Laura Pisello,et al.  How subjective and non-physical parameters affect occupants’ environmental comfort perception , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[40]  Wen-Pei Sung,et al.  Developing a Healthy, Comfortable and Energy-Saving Office Building , 2012 .

[41]  Anca D. Galasiu,et al.  Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review , 2006 .

[42]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  Synthesizing building physics with social psychology: An interdisciplinary framework for context and occupant behavior in office buildings , 2017 .

[43]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[44]  Kuo-Liang Lin,et al.  Energy Consumption Analysis for Concrete Residences—A Baseline Study in Taiwan , 2017 .

[45]  R. Dennis Cook,et al.  Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression , 2000, Technometrics.

[46]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 4: the Probe occupant surveys and their implications , 2001 .

[47]  Carol C. Menassa,et al.  Understanding energy-saving behaviors in the American workplace: A unified theory of motivation, opportunity, and ability , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[48]  D. Terry,et al.  Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions , 2012 .

[49]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes , 2000 .

[50]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[51]  Sami Karjalainen,et al.  Thermal comfort and use of thermostats in Finnish homes and offices , 2009 .

[52]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[53]  Julia K. Day,et al.  Thermal comfort or money saving? Exploring intentions to conserve energy among low-income households in the United States , 2017 .

[54]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  Human-building interaction at work: Findings from an interdisciplinary cross-country survey in Italy , 2018, Building and Environment.

[55]  P. Allison.  Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[56]  Chien-fei Chen,et al.  Who wants solar water heaters and alternative fuel vehicles? Assessing social–psychological predictors of adoption intention and policy support in China , 2016 .

[57]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Missing Data in Software Engineering , 2008, Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering.

[58]  Chien-fei Chen,et al.  Energy at work: Social psychological factors affecting energy conservation intentions within Chinese electric power companies , 2014 .

[59]  Marcel Schweiker,et al.  The effect of occupancy on perceived control, neutral temperature, and behavioral patterns , 2016 .

[60]  J. Rotter,et al.  The development and applications of social learning theory : selected papers , 1982 .

[61]  Susan Y. McGorry.  Measurement in a cross‐cultural environment: survey translation issues , 2000 .