Growth patterns and E-Moderating Supports in Asynchronous Online Discussions in an Undergraduate Blended Course

This study presents a case study of asynchronous online discussions’ (AOD) growth patterns in an undergraduate blended course to address the gap in our current understanding of how threads are developed in peer-moderated AODs. Building on a taxonomy of thread pattern proposed by Chan, Hew and Cheung (2009), growth patterns of thirty-six forums were explored on three patterns: Short Thread Pattern (SHTP), Extended Thread Pattern (ETP), and Split Thread Pattern (STP). The impact of peer moderating supports on thread growth was also investigated. Types of peer moderators’ supports were explored utilizing a coding scheme from Smet, Keer, Wever, and Valcke’s (2010) study. STP pattern was found to be more common than the other patterns with 74 (37.94%) out of 195 threaded discussions growing on it. The results also showed that, compared to SHTP, in both STP and ETP the occurrences of ‘Information exchange’ and ‘Knowledge construction’ supports appeared to be more, while the presences of supports stimulating ‘Development’, ‘Access and motivation’ and ‘Socialization’ were less. Furthermore, the use of ‘Access and motivation’ and ‘Socialization’ supports appeared to enhance early thread termination when used individually. Thread continuity was reinforced by the use of ‘Knowledge construction’ support with other moderating supports.

[1]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding Peer-questioning Strategies to Facilitate Metacognition During Online Small Group Discussion , 2005 .

[2]  Jim Hewitt.  Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences , 2005 .

[3]  Diane Weed,et al.  On-line discussions in nursing education: Increase retention and utilize innovative teaching strategies , 2014 .

[4]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Learning in asynchronous discussion groups: a multilevel approach to study the influence of student, group and task characteristics , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: Exploring the impact of three types of tutor training on patterns in tutor support and on tutor characteristics , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[7]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Examining the Factors Influencing Participants' Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Learning Communities , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Jim Hewitt.  How Habitual Online Practices Affect the Development of Asynchronous Discussion Threads , 2003 .

[9]  Joaquín Gairín-Sallán,et al.  Who exactly is the moderator? A consideration of online knowledge management network moderation in educational organisations , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Vanessa P. Dennen,et al.  From Message Posting to Learning Dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion , 2005 .

[11]  Wonseok Suh Suh.  EFFECTS OF ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK ON ACHIEVEMENT, PARTICIPATION, AND INTERACTION PATTERNS IN ONLINE GROUP DISCUSSION , 2011 .

[12]  Margaret Mazzolini,et al.  Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[14]  Kui Xie,et al.  What do the numbers say? The influence of motivation and peer feedback on students' behaviour in online discussions , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  The role of students' motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[16]  Kamariah Abu Bakar,et al.  Qualitative findings of students' perception on practice of self-regulated strategies in online community discussion , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: a review of the research and empirical exploration , 2010 .

[18]  J. Eccles,et al.  The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis , 1992 .

[19]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning , 2003 .

[20]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Sustaining Asynchronous Online Discussions: Contributing Factors and Peer Facilitation Techniques , 2009 .

[21]  Z. Berge.  e-Moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2013 .

[22]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Information ecology of collaborations in educational settings: influence of tool , 1997, CSCL.

[24]  Gudrun Oberprieler,et al.  Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Evaluating the Extent of Ill-Structured Problem Solving Process among Pre-Service Teachers in an Asynchronous Online Discussion and Reflection Log Learning Environment , 2004 .

[26]  Donnie Kirk,et al.  Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[27]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum , 2000 .

[28]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions , 2007 .

[30]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Asynchronous online discussion thread development: examining growth patterns and peer-facilitation techniques , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  M. Valcke,et al.  Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: A study of the evolution in tutor support , 2009 .

[32]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Allan Jeong,et al.  The Combined Effects of Response Time and Message Content on Growth Patterns of Discussion Threads in Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation. , 2004 .

[34]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Graduate Students' Experiences of Challenges in Online Asynchronous Discussions , 2004 .

[35]  Christopher Teplovs,et al.  An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads , 1999, CSCL.

[36]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[37]  Olivier Le Bohec,et al.  Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[39]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .