Structured assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation skills: the SALAS score

BackgroundTools are needed to assess laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) in the operating room. Here, we aimed to develop an objective rating scale for LCN.Study designWe defined the following key aspects of LCN: operational field centering, correct angle of the horizon, correct instrument visualization, verbal commands from the operating surgeon, and manual corrections from the operating surgeon. We then developed a score based on intraoperative error evaluation from intraoperative recordings of 80 procedures. Finally, the newly developed score was validated by four different raters using video-based analysis of 20 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies.ResultsWe developed and validated a tool for the structured assessment of laparoscopic assistant skills (SALAS). This score showed good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of > 0.7. Intraclass correlation revealed a low interrater variability (ICC 0.866) for the total score. Comparison of experienced and inexperienced camera assistants revealed significantly better SALAS scores for experienced assistants (p < 0.05).ConclusionOur present results show that SALAS score is valid, reliable, and practicable. This score can be used for future investigations of camera navigation efficiency and training.

[1]  J. Tuech,et al.  Is the image "right" for everyone? Introduction to the parallax effect in laparoscopic surgery. , 2017, Journal of visceral surgery.

[2]  Rachel Rosenthal,et al.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Gaze contingent cartesian control of a robotic arm for laparoscopic surgery , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on Camera Navigation Training for Key User Groups in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2014, Surgical innovation.

[5]  Werner Kneist,et al.  Influence of camera navigation training on team performance in virtual reality laparoscopy , 2014 .

[6]  J. Korndorffer,et al.  Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[7]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  H. Kenngott,et al.  Direct Observation versus Endoscopic Video Recording-Based Rating with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Training of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy , 2016, European Surgical Research.

[9]  S. Horgan,et al.  An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[10]  M. Paschold,et al.  Laparoscopic assistance by operating room nurses: Results of a virtual-reality study. , 2017, Nurse education today.

[11]  Reinhard Bittner,et al.  Laparoscopic Surgery—15 Years After Clinical Introduction , 2006, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  Felix Nickel,et al.  Impact of visual–spatial ability on laparoscopic camera navigation training , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  L. Konge,et al.  Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy—a randomized trial , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  Deborah M Rooney,et al.  Ongoing evaluation of video-based assessment of proctors' scoring of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery manual skills examination. , 2015, Journal of surgical education.

[15]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[16]  Hubertus Feussner,et al.  Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case–control study , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  Melina C Vassiliou,et al.  A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. , 2005, American journal of surgery.