Wildfires, complexity, and highly optimized tolerance.

Recent, large fires in the western United States have rekindled debates about fire management and the role of natural fire regimes in the resilience of terrestrial ecosystems. This real-world experience parallels debates involving abstract models of forest fires, a central metaphor in complex systems theory. Both real and modeled fire-prone landscapes exhibit roughly power law statistics in fire size versus frequency. Here, we examine historical fire catalogs and a detailed fire simulation model; both are in agreement with a highly optimized tolerance model. Highly optimized tolerance suggests robustness tradeoffs underlie resilience in different fire-prone ecosystems. Understanding these mechanisms may provide new insights into the structure of ecological systems and be key in evaluating fire management strategies and sensitivities to climate change.

[1]  John Doyle,et al.  Complexity and robustness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  C. S. Holling.  Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[3]  E. Odum.  Fundamentals of ecology , 1972 .

[4]  Rosa Lasaponara,et al.  Time-scaling properties in forest-fire sequences observed in Gargano area (southern Italy) , 2005 .

[5]  Doyle,et al.  Highly optimized tolerance: robustness and design in complex systems , 2000, Physical review letters.

[6]  F. Woodward,et al.  The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[7]  L. Gunderson.  Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application , 2000 .

[8]  Yves Bergeron,et al.  Change of fire frequency in the eastern Canadian boreal forests during the Holocene: does vegetation composition or climate trigger the fire regime? , 2001 .

[9]  D. Richardson.  Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus , 2000 .

[10]  Brandon T Bestelmeyer,et al.  Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  JAMES R. MILLER,et al.  Spatial Extrapolation: The Science of Predicting Ecological Patterns and Processes , 2004 .

[12]  J. Wilson,et al.  Positive-feedback Switches in Plant Communities , 1992 .

[13]  F. Keesing,et al.  Frontiers of Ecology , 2001 .

[14]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves , 1978 .

[15]  J Doyle,et al.  Highly optimized tolerance and power laws in dense and sparse resource regimes. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  R. Tanaka,et al.  Scale-rich metabolic networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[17]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change , 1992 .

[18]  J. Doyle,et al.  Mutation, specialization, and hypersensitivity in highly optimized tolerance , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Fowler,et al.  An Application of the Highly Optimized Tolerance Model to Electrical Blackouts , 2003, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[20]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[21]  J. C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[22]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[23]  Ricardo Díaz-Delgado,et al.  Self-organized criticality of wildfires ecologically revisited , 2001 .

[24]  M. Vilà,et al.  Positive fire–grass feedback in Mediterranean Basin woodlands , 2001 .

[25]  B. W. Wilgen,et al.  Fire and Plants , 1995, Population and Community Biology Series.

[26]  M. Finney.  FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[27]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  Fire and the Miocene expansion of C4 grasslands , 2005 .

[28]  R. Ulanowicz.  Ecology, the ascendent perspective , 1997 .

[29]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[30]  Max A. Moritz,et al.  ANALYZING EXTREME DISTURBANCE EVENTS: FIRE IN LOS PADRES NATIONAL FOREST , 1997 .

[31]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Ecological Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale , 1998, Ecosystems.

[32]  A. Karimi,et al.  Master‟s thesis , 2011 .

[33]  Steven D. Gaines,et al.  SOME IMPLICATIONS OF DIRECT POSITIVE INTERACTIONS FOR COMMUNITY SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1997 .

[34]  J. Pate,et al.  The promotive effect of smoke derived from burnt native vegetation on seed germination of Western Australian plants , 1995, Oecologia.

[35]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: Disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Robert W. Mutch,et al.  Wildland Fires and Ecosystems--A Hypothesis , 1970 .

[37]  N. W. PIRIE,et al.  Biological Diversity , 1964 .

[38]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Flammability and serotiny as strategies: correlated evolution in pines , 2001 .

[39]  J. Keeley,et al.  Trace gas emissions and smoke-induced seed germination , 1997 .

[40]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractals and Scaling in Finance , 1997 .

[41]  J M Carlson,et al.  Highly optimized tolerance: a mechanism for power laws in designed systems. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[42]  H. Anderson.  Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior , 1982 .

[43]  M. J. Schroeder,et al.  SYNOPTIC WEATHER TYPES ASSOCIATED WITH CRITICAL FIRE WEATHER , 1964 .

[44]  S. Franklin,et al.  Temporally-explicit models of fire and forest , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[45]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[46]  Steven G. Cumming,et al.  A parametric model of the fire-size distribution , 2001 .

[47]  J. N. Westwood,et al.  PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Forest and Range Experiment Station , 1970 .

[48]  E. Johnson,et al.  The Relative Importance of Fuels and Weather on Fire Behavior in Subalpine Forests , 1995 .

[49]  K. Gaston.  Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[50]  Sarah F. Tebbens,et al.  Upper-truncated Power Laws in Natural Systems , 2001 .

[51]  G. Likens,et al.  Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. , 1979 .

[52]  Max A. Moritz,et al.  SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF CONTROLS ON SHRUBLAND FIRE REGIMES: AGE DEPENDENCY AND FIRE HAZARD , 2003 .

[53]  Wang Bing-Hong,et al.  Self-organized criticality of forest fire in China , 2001 .

[54]  Doyle,et al.  Power laws, highly optimized tolerance, and generalized source coding , 2000, Physical review letters.

[55]  R. Callaway.  Positive interactions in plant communities and the individualistic-continuum concept , 1997, Oecologia.

[56]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Forest fires: An example of self-organized critical behavior , 1998, Science.

[57]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  Testing a basic assumption of shrubland fire management: how important is fuel age? , 2004 .

[58]  X. Lee,et al.  Introduction to wildland fire , 1997 .

[59]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[60]  R. Paine,et al.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[62]  B. Malamud,et al.  Characterizing wildfire regimes in the United States. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.