Design by Competition and the Potential for Public Participation: Assessing an Urban Design Competition on Toronto’s Waterfront

Design competitions are often used to select design teams for high profile development projects, yet have received scant attention in the literature. Seeking to redress this imbalance, this paper presents a competition model that was employed on Toronto’s waterfront in 2006 for a large public realm project and describes how it was structured around an iterative public consultation process. Although subject to a number of implementation delays, the competition sponsors built a constituency of support for the redevelopment project by engaging lay people in the decision-making process. The paper argues that the competition struck a balance between lay input and professional knowledge and contends that future research efforts should continue to explore means by which public participation can be integrated into design competitions.

[1]  Jack L. Nasar Design by Competition: Making Design Competition Work , 1999 .

[2]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[3]  J. Laidley Constructing a Foundation for Change: The Ecosystem Approach and the Global Imperative on Toronto’s Central Waterfront , 2005 .

[4]  G. Desfor,et al.  A political economy of the waterfrontier: Planning and development in Toronto , 1989 .

[5]  Magali Sarfatti Larson,et al.  Architectural competitions as discursive events , 1994 .

[6]  Joris Van Wezemael Research on architectural competitions: Towards a theory of jury-based decision-making , 2011 .

[7]  Elías Torres Tur Toronto central waterfront intenational competition. Innovative design competition , 2007 .

[8]  P. Filion,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Crafting on Planning , 2011 .

[9]  Peter Jacobsen,et al.  Dialogues and the problems of knowing: Reinventing the architectural competition , 2011 .

[10]  J. Laidley,et al.  Old Mega-Projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto , 2008 .

[11]  Hélène Lipstadt Can ‘art Professions’ Be Bourdieuean Fields Of Cultural Production? The Case Of The Architecture Competition , 2003 .

[12]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[13]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[14]  D. Gordon Planning, design and managing change in urban waterfront redevelopment , 1996 .

[15]  Judith Strong Participating in architectural competitions: A guide for competitors, promoters, and assessors , 1976 .

[16]  John Punter,et al.  Urban design in central Sydney 1945–2002: Laissez-Faire and discretionary traditions in the accidental city , 2005 .

[17]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd Edition , 2002 .