Ultrasound confirmation of guidewire position may eliminate accidental arterial dilatation during central venous cannulation

BackgroundUltrasound guidance during central line insertion has significantly reduced complications associated with this procedure and has led to it being incorporated as standard of care in many institutions. However, inadvertent arterial penetration and dilation remains a problem despite ultrasound guidance and can result in significant morbidity and even mortality. Dynamic ultrasound confirmation of guidewire position within the vein prior to dilation may help to prevent and even eliminate this feared complication.MethodsA prospectively collected database of central line insertions for one author utilizing this novel technique was retrospectively reviewed for all incidents of arterial dilation over a period from September 2008 to January 2010.ResultsDuring the study period 53 central lines were inserted with no incidents of arterial dilation.ConclusionsUltrasound confirmation of guidewire position has the potential to reduce or eliminate the morbidity and mortality of arterial dilation during central line placement.

[1]  Michael Blaivas,et al.  An unseen danger: Frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance* , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[2]  Daniel Hind,et al.  Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Y Menu,et al.  A bedside ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax in the critically ill. Lung sliding. , 1995, Chest.

[4]  M. Blaivas.  Video Analysis of Accidental Arterial Cannulation With Dynamic Ultrasound Guidance for Central Venous Access , 2009, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[5]  G. Sicard,et al.  Subclavian Artery Injury, Vertebral Artery Dissection, and Arteriovenous Fistulae following Attempt at Central Line Placement , 2002, Annals of vascular surgery.

[6]  J. Pines,et al.  What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[7]  A G Randolph,et al.  Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[8]  A. Arvanitis,et al.  Iatrogenic pseudo-aneurysm of the subclavian artery and dissection of the aorta , secondary to central venous line insertion : a treatment dilemma ! , 2006 .

[9]  M. Blaivas,et al.  Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[10]  P. Myles,et al.  Analysis of demographic characteristics. , 1994, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[11]  J. Klassen,et al.  Image-guided central venous catheters for apheresis , 1999, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[12]  K. McDonald,et al.  Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. , 2001, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[13]  D. R. Thompson,et al.  Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance. , 1995, Critical care medicine.

[14]  R. K. Webb,et al.  Problems Associated with Vascular Access: An Analysis of 2000 Incident Reports , 1993, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[15]  S. Keenan,et al.  Use of ultrasound to place central lines. , 2002, Journal of critical care.