Effective-one-body waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity simulations: coalescence of nonspinning, equal-mass black holes

We calibrate the effective-one-body (EOB) model to an accurate numerical simulation of an equal-mass, nonspinning binary black-hole coalescence produced by the Caltech-Cornell Collaboration. Aligning the EOB and numerical waveforms at low frequency over a time interval of ~1000M, and taking into account the uncertainties in the numerical simulation, we investigate the significance and degeneracy of the EOB-adjustable parameters during inspiral, plunge, and merger, and determine the minimum number of EOB-adjustable parameters that achieves phase and amplitude agreements on the order of the numerical error. We find that phase and fractional amplitude differences between the numerical and EOB values of the dominant gravitational-wave mode h_22 can be reduced to 0.02 radians and 2%, respectively, until a time 20M before merger, and to 0.04 radians and 7%, respectively, at a time 20M after merger (during ringdown). Using LIGO, Enhanced LIGO, and Advanced LIGO noise curves, we find that the overlap between the EOB and the numerical h_22, maximized only over the initial phase and time of arrival, is larger than 0.999 for equal-mass binary black holes with total mass 30–150 M☉. In addition to the leading gravitational mode (2, 2), we compare the dominant subleading modes (4, 4) and (3, 2) for the inspiral and find phase and amplitude differences on the order of the numerical error. We also determine the mass-ratio dependence of one of the EOB-adjustable parameters by calibrating to numerical inspiral waveforms for black-hole binaries with mass ratios 2:1 and 3:1. The results presented in this paper improve and extend recent successful attempts aimed at providing gravitational-wave data analysts the best analytical EOB model capable of interpolating accurate numerical simulations.

[1]  P. Ajith,et al.  Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes: Nonspinning binaries , 2008 .

[2]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[3]  F. Zerilli,et al.  Effective potential for even parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations , 1970 .

[4]  B. Barish,et al.  LIGO and the Detection of Gravitational Waves , 1999 .

[5]  Paolo Conconi,et al.  Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , 2012 .

[6]  High accuracy simulations of black hole binaries: Spins anti-aligned with the orbital angular momentum , 2009, 0909.1313.

[7]  N. Sago,et al.  Gravitational self-force correction to the innermost stable circular orbit of a Schwarzschild black hole. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[8]  J. Mathews,et al.  Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit , 1963 .

[9]  H. Pfeiffer,et al.  Implementation of higher-order absorbing boundary conditions for the Einstein equations , 2008, 0811.3593.

[10]  Vitor Cardoso,et al.  Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes , 2009, 0905.2975.

[11]  A. Buonanno,et al.  A physical template family for gravitational waves from precessing binaries of spinning compact objects: Application to single-spin binaries , 2003, gr-qc/0310034.

[12]  T. Damour,et al.  Faithful effective-one-body waveforms of small-mass-ratio coalescing black-hole binaries , 2007, 0705.2519.

[13]  T. Damour,et al.  Effective one body approach to the dynamics of two spinning black holes with next-to-leading order spin-orbit coupling , 2008, 0803.0915.

[14]  Lawrence E. Kidder,et al.  High-accuracy waveforms for binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown , 2008, 0810.1767.

[15]  A. Buonanno,et al.  Hamiltonian of a spinning test particle in curved spacetime , 2009, 0907.4745.

[16]  Yi Pan,et al.  Effective-one-body waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity simulations: coalescence of non-precessing, spinning, equal-mass black holes , 2009, 0912.3466.

[17]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[18]  Thibault Damour,et al.  Improved analytical description of inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries , 2009, 0902.0136.

[19]  Manuel Tiglio,et al.  Gauge invariant perturbations of Schwarzschild black holes in horizon penetrating coordinates , 2001 .

[20]  Duncan A. Brown,et al.  Model waveform accuracy standards for gravitational wave data analysis , 2008, 0809.3844.

[21]  B. Schutz Fundamental physics with LISA , 2009 .

[22]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[23]  A. Buonanno,et al.  Modeling extreme mass ratio inspirals within the effective-one-body approach. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[24]  Michael Boyle,et al.  High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions , 2007, 0710.0158.

[25]  T. Damour,et al.  Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics , 1999 .

[26]  Lawrence E. Kidder,et al.  High-accuracy numerical simulation of black-hole binaries: Computation of the gravitational-wave energy flux and comparisons with post-Newtonian approximants , 2008, 0804.4184.

[27]  T. Damour,et al.  Accurate effective-one-body waveforms of inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries , 2008, 0803.3162.

[28]  S. McWilliams,et al.  A data-analysis driven comparison of analytic and numerical coalescing binary waveforms: nonspinning case , 2007, 0704.1964.

[29]  T. Damour,et al.  Comparing effective-one-body gravitational waveforms to accurate numerical data , 2007, 0711.2628.

[30]  A. Buonanno,et al.  Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries , 2006, gr-qc/0610122.

[31]  T. Damour Gravitational self-force in a Schwarzschild background and the effective one-body formalism , 2009, 0910.5533.

[32]  Thibault Damour,et al.  Determination of the last stable orbit for circular general relativistic binaries at the third post-Newtonian approximation , 2000 .

[33]  M. Loupias,et al.  The Virgo status , 2006 .

[34]  S. McWilliams,et al.  Toward faithful templates for non-spinning binary black holes using the effective-one-body approach , 2007, 0706.3732.

[35]  Lawrence E. Kidder,et al.  Using full information when computing modes of post-Newtonian waveforms from inspiralling compact binaries in circular orbit , 2007, 0710.0614.

[36]  Transition from inspiral to plunge in precessing binaries of spinning black holes , 2005, gr-qc/0508067.

[37]  Thibault Damour,et al.  Coalescence of two spinning black holes: an effective one-body approach , 2001, gr-qc/0103018.

[38]  Thibault Damour,et al.  Improved resummation of post-Newtonian multipolar waveforms from circularized compact binaries , 2008, 0811.2069.

[39]  Thibault Damour,et al.  Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences , 2000 .

[40]  T. Damour,et al.  Faithful Effective-One-Body waveforms of equal-mass coalescing black-hole binaries , 2007, 0712.3003.

[41]  John Archibald Wheeler,et al.  Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity , 1957 .