A Framework for Understanding Opportunity Recognition

The issue of opportunity recognition, as opposed to opportunity evaluation, has received far less attention. Yet it is opportunity recognition that often drives deals. This article presents and tests six hypotheses on opportunity recognition against a sample of 262 respondents divided among financiers and entrepreneurs. The hypotheses measure the differences between respondents' views on the following topics: alertness to opportunities; creativity and idea generation; search process and strategies; causes of opportunities; opportunity sources; evaluation; and “feel.” In general, both groups had similar responses, but several interesting differences were discovered.

[1]  W. Braud,et al.  Distant intentionality and healing: assessing the evidence. , 1997, Alternative therapies in health and medicine.

[2]  David E. Gumpert,et al.  The heart of entrepreneurship , 1985 .

[3]  L. Palich,et al.  Using Cognitive Theory to Explain Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking: Challenging Conventional Wisdom , 1995 .

[4]  Mark van Osnabrugge.  A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: An agency theory-based analysis , 2000 .

[5]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward the standardization of venture capital investment evaluation : decision criteria for rating investee business plans , 2002 .

[6]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria Used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Venture Proposals , 1985 .

[7]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Theorizing about Entrepreneurship , 1992 .

[8]  Israel M. Kirzner.  Perception, opportunity, and profit , 1979 .

[9]  J. Solterer.  The Entrepreneur in Economic Theory , 1950 .

[10]  Richard B. Robinson,et al.  Emerging strategies in the venture capital industry , 1987 .

[11]  S. Spinelli,et al.  New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[12]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success , 1988 .

[13]  S. Shane.  Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[14]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Clarifying decision making in high-growth ventures: The use of responsibility charting , 1989 .

[15]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[16]  S. Venkataraman,et al.  The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor''s perspective , 1997 .

[17]  Justin B. Craig,et al.  Quantifying “gut feeling” in the opportunity recognition process , 2001 .

[18]  William B. Gartner,et al.  Acting as If: Differentiating Entrepreneurial from Organizational Behavior , 1992 .

[19]  Kyungjin Jung,et al.  Validation of the venture evaluation model in Korea , 1994 .

[20]  Angelo J. Kinicki,et al.  INTERPRETING EVENT CAUSES: THE COMPLEMENTARY ROLE OF CATEGORIZATION AND ATTRIBUTION PROCESSES , 1995 .

[21]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[22]  A. Link,et al.  The entrepreneur: mainstream views and radical critiques , 1983 .

[23]  W. Braud,et al.  Consciousness Interactions with Remote Biological Systems: Anomalous Intentionality Effects , 1991 .

[24]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making , 1997 .

[25]  M. Bhave.  A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation , 1994 .

[26]  B. Zider,et al.  How venture capital works. , 1998, Harvard business review.