Efeitos de fatores ambientes sobre a ovulação múltipla de doadoras zebuínas

Data on 1,294 superovulations of Brahman, Gyr, Guzerat and Nellore females were used to evaluate the effects of: breed; herd; year of birth; inbreeding coefficient and age at superovulation of the donor; month, season and year of superovulation; hormone source and dose; and the number of previous treatments on the superovulation results. Four data sets were considered to study the influence of donors’ elimination effect after each consecutive superovulation. Each one contained only records of the first, or of the two firsts, or three firsts or all superovulations. The average number of palpated corpora lutea per superovulation varied from 8.6 to 12.6. The total number of recovered structures and viable embryos ranged from 4.1 to 7.3 and from 7.3 to 13.8, respectively. Least squares means of the number of viable embryos at first superovulation were 7.8 ± 6.6 (Brahman), 3.7 ± 4.5 (Gyr), 6.1 ± 5.9 (Guzerat) and 5.2 ± 5.9 (Nellore). The numbers of viable embryos of the second and the third superovulations were not different from those of the first superovulation. The mean intervals between first and second superovulations were 91.8 days for Brahman, 101.8 days for Gyr, 93.1 days for Guzerat and 111.3 days for Nellore donors. Intervals between the second and the third superovulations were 134.3, 110.3, 116.4 and 108.5 days for Brahman, Gyr, Guzerat and Nellore donors, respectively. Effects of herd nested within breed and dose nested within hormone affected all traits. For some data sets, the effects of month and order of superovulation on three traits were importants. The maximum number of viable embryos was observed for 7-8 year-old donors. The best responses for corpora lutea and recovered structures were observed for 4-5 year-old donors. Inbreeding coefficient was positively associated to the number of recovered structures when data set on all superovulations was considered.

[1]  R. L. Reis,et al.  Estatística aplicada a experimentação animal , 2002 .

[2]  F. Nicholas Genetic improvement through reproductive technology , 1996 .

[3]  H. Callesen,et al.  Practical aspects of multiple ovulation-embryo transfer in cattle , 1996 .

[4]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Analysis of factors affecting superovulatory responses in ruminants , 1995, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[5]  D. Armstrong Recent advances in superovulation of cattle , 1993 .

[6]  R. Randel,et al.  Effects of repeated superovulation and flushing on reproductive performance of Bos indicus cows , 1987 .

[7]  R. Foote,et al.  Effect of donor-embryo-recipient interactions on pregnancy rate in a large-scale bovine embryo transfer program , 1987 .

[8]  W. Lamberson,et al.  Repeatability of response to superovulation in Brangus cows. , 1986, Theriogenology.

[9]  J. Walton,et al.  Factors affecting the yield of viable embryos by superovulated Holstein-Friesian cows. , 1986, Theriogenology.

[10]  R. A. Dailey,et al.  Age, dose of FSH and other factors affecting superovulation in Holstein cows. , 1986, Journal of animal science.

[11]  F. Nicholas,et al.  Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting , 1983 .

[12]  D. Monniaux,et al.  Superovulatory responses of cattle , 1983 .

[13]  J. Hasler,et al.  The relationship between age and response to superovulation in holstein cows and heifers. , 1981, Theriogenology.

[14]  R. S. Youngquist,et al.  Reproductive hormones associated with the ovarian cyst response to GnRH. , 1979, Theriogenology.

[15]  D. Chupin,et al.  Superovulation: a limit to egg transfer in cattle. , 1977, Theriogenology.