Heterogeneous response dynamics in retinal ganglion cells: the interplay of predictive coding and adaptation.

To make efficient use of their limited signaling capacity, sensory systems often use predictive coding. Predictive coding works by exploiting the statistical regularities of the environment--specifically, by filtering the sensory input to remove its predictable elements, thus enabling the neural signal to focus on what cannot be guessed. To do this, the neural filters must remove the environmental correlations. If predictive coding is to work well in multiple environments, sensory systems must adapt their filtering properties to fit each environment's statistics. Using the visual system as a model, we determine whether this happens. We compare retinal ganglion cell dynamics in two very different environments: white noise and natural. Because natural environments have more power than that of white noise at low temporal frequencies, predictive coding is expected to produce a suppression of low frequencies and an enhancement of high frequencies, compared with the behavior in a white-noise environment. We find that this holds, but only in part. First, predictive coding behavior is not uniform: most on cells manifest it, whereas off cells, on average, do not. Overlaid on this nonuniformity between cell classes is further nonuniformity within both cell classes. These findings indicate that functional considerations beyond predictive coding play an important role in shaping the dynamics of sensory adaptation. Moreover, the differences in behavior between on and off cell classes add to the growing evidence that these classes are not merely homogeneous mirror images of each other and suggest that their roles in visual processing are more complex than expected from the classic view.

[1]  Michael G. Strintzis,et al.  Optimal linear compression under unreliable representation and robust PCA neural models , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[2]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Feature Selection in Simple Neurons: How Coding Depends on Spiking Dynamics , 2009, Neural Computation.

[3]  J D Victor,et al.  How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  S. Laughlin A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[5]  William Bialek,et al.  Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission , 2000, Neuron.

[6]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Adaptation without parameter change: Dynamic gain control in motion detection , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Atick,et al.  STATISTICS OF NATURAL TIME-VARYING IMAGES , 1995 .

[8]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  Towards a Theory of Early Visual Processing , 1990, Neural Computation.

[9]  Robert A. Frazor,et al.  Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  R. Shapley,et al.  The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Ganglion Cell Adaptability: Does the Coupling of Horizontal Cells Play a Role? , 2008, PloS one.

[13]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[15]  J. Alonso,et al.  Adaptation to Stimulus Contrast and Correlations during Natural Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[16]  E J Chichilnisky,et al.  A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses , 2001, Network.

[17]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes? , 1992, Neural Computation.

[18]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Different Circuits for ON and OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells Cause Different Contrast Sensitivities , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Partha P. Mitra,et al.  Observed Brain Dynamics , 2007 .

[20]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Symmetry Breakdown in the ON and OFF Pathways of the Retina at Night: Functional Implications , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  R. W. Rodieck The vertebrate retina : principles of structure and function , 1973 .

[23]  Fred Rieke,et al.  Network Variability Limits Stimulus-Evoked Spike Timing Precision in Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2006, Neuron.

[24]  A. Fairhall,et al.  Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation , 2009, Neuron.

[25]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[26]  J. Atick,et al.  Temporal decorrelation: a theory of lagged and nonlagged responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus , 1995 .

[27]  Vijay Balasubramanian,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture in the retina , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  M. Meister,et al.  Dynamic predictive coding by the retina , 2005, Nature.

[29]  R C Reid,et al.  Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex , 2006, Nature.

[31]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  J. Dowling,et al.  Organization of vertebrate retinas. , 1970, Investigative ophthalmology.

[33]  Pamela Reinagel,et al.  Contrast adaptation in a nonadapting LGN model. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Sheila Nirenberg,et al.  Classification of retinal ganglion cells: a statistical approach. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Pamela Reinagel,et al.  Benefits of Contrast Normalization Demonstrated in Neurons and Model Cells , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The dynamics of primate M retinal ganglion cells , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[37]  V Zemon,et al.  Asymmetries in ON and OFF visual pathways of humans revealed using contrast-evoked cortical potentials , 1988, Visual Neuroscience.

[38]  W. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  Partha P. Mitra,et al.  Automatic sorting of multiple unit neuronal signals in the presence of anisotropic and non-Gaussian variability , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.