An immersed boundary method for fluid-structure interaction based on variational transfer

Abstract We present a novel framework inspired by the Immersed Boundary Method for predicting the fluid-structure interaction of complex structures immersed in laminar, transitional and turbulent flows. The key elements of the proposed fluid-structure interaction framework are 1) the solution of elastodynamics equations for the structure, 2) the use of a high-order Navier–Stokes solver for the flow, and 3) the variational transfer ( L 2 -projection) for coupling the solid and fluid subproblems. The dynamic behavior of a deformable structure is simulated in a finite element framework by adopting a fully implicit scheme for its temporal integration. It allows for mechanical constitutive laws including inhomogeneous and fiber-reinforced materials. The Navier–Stokes equations for the incompressible flow are discretized with high-order finite differences which allow for the direct numerical simulation of laminar, transitional and turbulent flows. The structure and the flow solvers are coupled by using an L 2 -projection method for the transfer of velocities and forces between the fluid grid and the solid mesh. This strategy allows for the numerical solution of coupled large scale problems based on nonconforming structured and unstructured grids. The transfer between fluid and solid limits the convergence order of the flow solver close to the fluid-solid interface. The framework is validated with the Turek–Hron benchmark and a newly proposed benchmark modelling the flow-induced oscillation of an inert plate. A three-dimensional simulation of an elastic beam in transitional flow is provided to show the solver's capability of coping with anisotropic elastic structures immersed in complex fluid flow.

[1]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Improved Volume Conservation in the Computation of Flows with Immersed Elastic Boundaries , 1993 .

[2]  M. G. C. Nestola,et al.  Three-band decomposition analysis in multiscale FSI models of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2016 .

[3]  Giuseppe Pascazio,et al.  A moving-least-squares immersed boundary method for simulating the fluid-structure interaction of elastic bodies with arbitrary thickness , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[4]  F. Baaijens A fictitious domain/mortar element method for fluid-structure interaction , 2001 .

[5]  Francesca Rapetti,et al.  Basics and some applications of the mortar element method , 2005 .

[6]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS , 2005 .

[7]  S. Turek,et al.  Proposal for Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction between an Elastic Object and Laminar Incompressible Flow , 2006 .

[8]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Efficient and accurate numerical quadrature for immersed boundary methods , 2015, Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences.

[9]  R. Glowinski,et al.  Distributed Lagrange multipliers based on fictitious domain method for second order elliptic problems , 2007 .

[10]  F. Sotiropoulos,et al.  Comparative hemodynamics in an aorta with bicuspid and trileaflet valves , 2015 .

[11]  Luca Heltai,et al.  Benchmarking the immersed finite element method for fluid-structure interaction problems , 2013, Comput. Math. Appl..

[12]  Elias Balaras,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of the pulsatile flow through an aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Rolf Krause,et al.  A Parallel Approach to the Variational Transfer of Discrete Fields between Arbitrarily Distributed Unstructured Finite Element Meshes , 2016, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  David Farrell,et al.  Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. , 2006, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[15]  Peter Betsch,et al.  A mortar approach for Fluid–Structure interaction problems: Immersed strategies for deformable and rigid bodies , 2014 .

[16]  Christopher F. Rowlatt,et al.  A spectral element formulation of the immersed boundary method for Newtonian fluids , 2016 .

[17]  Christoph Lenzen,et al.  Coupling Molecular Dynamics and Continua with Weak Constraints , 2011, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[18]  I. Borazjani Fluid–structure interaction, immersed boundary-finite element method simulations of bio-prosthetic heart valves , 2013 .

[19]  F. Leckie,et al.  Strength and Stiffness of Engineering Systems , 2009 .

[20]  Rolf Krause,et al.  Parametric finite elements with bijective mappings , 2017 .

[21]  Stefan Turek,et al.  Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction: A Comparison of Different Discretization and Solution Approaches , 2011 .

[22]  Hu Dai,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction involving large deformations: 3D simulations and applications to biological systems , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  Javier Jiménez,et al.  A high-resolution code for turbulent boundary layers , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[24]  L. Heltai,et al.  A finite element approach to the immersed boundary method , 2003 .

[25]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[26]  A. Huerta,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems , 2003 .

[27]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  A numerical approach for simulating fluid structure interaction of flexible thin shells undergoing arbitrarily large deformations in complex domains , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[28]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  A review of state-of-the-art numerical methods for simulating flow through mechanical heart valves , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[29]  Per Lötstedt,et al.  High order accurate solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2005 .

[30]  Dominik Obrist,et al.  High-order accurate solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on massively parallel computers , 2010, Journal of Computational Physics.

[31]  A. Huerta,et al.  Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian Methods , 2004 .

[32]  Dharshi Devendran,et al.  An immersed boundary energy-based method for incompressible viscoelasticity , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[33]  E. Meiburg,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of particle transport in a model estuary , 2010 .

[34]  Rajat Mittal,et al.  A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[35]  E. Meiburg,et al.  Sediment-laden fresh water above salt water: nonlinear simulations , 2014, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method , 2016, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[37]  Umberto Morbiducci,et al.  Numerical simulation of the dynamics of a bileaflet prosthetic heart valve using a fluid-structure interaction approach. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  Computational comparison of aortic root stresses in presence of stentless and stented aortic valve bio-prostheses , 2017, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[39]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models , 2015, Computational mechanics.

[40]  Dan S. Henningson,et al.  The Fringe Region Technique and the Fourier Method Used in the Direct Numerical Simulation of Spatially Evolving Viscous Flows , 1999, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[41]  Jinhee Jeong,et al.  On the identification of a vortex , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[42]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[43]  Lucy T. Zhang Immersed finite element method for fluid-structure interactions , 2007 .

[44]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Simulating the fluid dynamics of natural and prosthetic heart valves using the immersed boundary method , 2009 .

[45]  C. Peskin Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method , 1972 .

[46]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Nonlinear rotation‐free three‐node shell finite element formulation , 2013 .

[47]  Martin Weiser,et al.  A control reduced primal interior point method for a class of control constrained optimal control problems , 2008, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[48]  L. Kleiser,et al.  Stabilisation of subcritical bypass transition in the leading-edge boundary layer by suction , 2014, Proceeding of Eighth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.