Single-qubit gates based on targeted phase shifts in a 3D neutral atom array

How to single out the right atoms For a quantum computer to be useful, its qubits have to be able to change their state in response to external stimuli. But when a large number of qubits are packed in a three-dimensional (3D) structure to optimize the use of space, altering one qubit can unintentionally change the state of others. Wang et al. devised a clever way to perform high-fidelity quantum gates only on intended qubits in a 3D array of Cs atoms. Although the operation initially changed the state of some of the other atoms, additional manipulation recovered their original state. The technique may be applicable to other quantum computing implementations. Science, this issue p. 1562 Quantum gates with high fidelity are demonstrated in a densely packed three-dimensional lattice of cesium atoms. Although the quality of individual quantum bits (qubits) and quantum gates has been steadily improving, the number of qubits in a single system has increased quite slowly. Here, we demonstrate arbitrary single-qubit gates based on targeted phase shifts, an approach that can be applied to atom, ion, or other atom-like systems. These gates are highly insensitive to addressing beam imperfections and have little cross-talk, allowing for a dramatic scaling up of qubit number. We have performed gates in series on 48 individually targeted sites in a 40% full 5 by 5 by 5 three-dimensional array created by an optical lattice. Using randomized benchmarking, we demonstrate an average gate fidelity of 0.9962(16), with an average cross-talk fidelity of 0.9979(2) (numbers in parentheses indicate the one standard deviation uncertainty in the final digits).

[1]  M. Saffman,et al.  Rydberg-blockade controlled-not gate and entanglement in a two-dimensional array of neutral-atom qubits , 2015, 1506.06416.

[2]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits , 2015, Nature Communications.

[3]  Yang Wang,et al.  Coherent Addressing of Individual Neutral Atoms in a 3D Optical Lattice. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[4]  M Saffman,et al.  Randomized benchmarking of single-qubit gates in a 2D array of neutral-atom qubits. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[5]  I. Deutsch,et al.  Robust quantum logic in neutral atoms via adiabatic Rydberg dressing , 2014, 1411.2622.

[6]  S. Webster,et al.  Generation of spin-motion entanglement in a trapped ion using long-wavelength radiation , 2014, 1409.1862.

[7]  E. Knill,et al.  Tunable spin–spin interactions and entanglement of ions in separate potential wells , 2014, Nature.

[8]  J. P. Dehollain,et al.  An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[9]  A. Varon,et al.  A trapped-ion-based quantum byte with 10−5 next-neighbour cross-talk , 2014, Nature Communications.

[10]  N. Linke,et al.  High-Fidelity Preparation, Gates, Memory, and Readout of a Trapped-Ion Quantum Bit. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[11]  R. Barends,et al.  Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance , 2014, Nature.

[12]  J. Smith,et al.  Coherent imaging spectroscopy of a quantum many-body spin system , 2014, Science.

[13]  I. Deutsch,et al.  Robust site-resolvable quantum gates in an optical lattice via inhomogeneous control , 2013, Nature Communications.

[14]  Yang Wang,et al.  3D projection sideband cooling. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[15]  Alexandre M. Souza,et al.  Robust dynamical decoupling , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  Daniel Nigg,et al.  Experimental Repetitive Quantum Error Correction , 2011, Science.

[17]  E. Knill,et al.  Single-qubit-gate error below 10 -4 in a trapped ion , 2011, 1104.2552.

[18]  Dieter Suter,et al.  Robust dynamical decoupling for quantum computing and quantum memory. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[19]  I. Bloch,et al.  Single-spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator , 2011, Nature.

[20]  S. Olmschenk,et al.  Randomized benchmarking of atomic qubits in an optical lattice , 2010, 1008.2790.

[21]  Jungsang Kim,et al.  Independent individual addressing of multiple neutral atom qubits with a micromirror-based beam steering system , 2010, 1006.2757.

[22]  P Grangier,et al.  Entanglement of two individual neutral atoms using Rydberg blockade. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[23]  R. Laflamme,et al.  Randomized benchmarking of single- and multi-qubit control in liquid-state NMR quantum information processing , 2008, 0808.3973.

[24]  R. Blatt,et al.  Towards fault-tolerant quantum computing with trapped ions , 2008, 0803.2798.

[25]  D. Weiss,et al.  Imaging single atoms in a three dimensional array , 2007 .

[26]  R. B. Blakestad,et al.  Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Gates , 2007, 0707.0963.

[27]  Jose Luis Hevia,et al.  Quantum Computing , 2005, IEEE Software.

[28]  Ashish V. Thapliyal,et al.  Perfect pattern formation of neutral atoms in an addressable optical lattice , 2005 .

[29]  E. Knill,et al.  Realization of quantum error correction , 2004, Nature.

[30]  Ashish V. Thapliyal,et al.  Another way to approach zero entropy for a finite system of atoms , 2004 .

[31]  E. Knill Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices , 2004, Nature.

[32]  A. Kitaev,et al.  Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas (14 pages) , 2004, quant-ph/0403025.

[33]  Pedram Khalili Amiri,et al.  Quantum computers , 2003 .

[34]  Jonathan A. Jones,et al.  Tackling systematic errors in quantum logic gates with composite rotations , 2002, quant-ph/0208092.

[35]  D. DiVincenzo,et al.  The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation , 2000, quant-ph/0002077.

[36]  Steane,et al.  Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[37]  P. Shor,et al.  Quantum Computers , 2021, Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications.

[38]  T. Gullion,et al.  Elimination of resonance offset effects in rotational-echo, double-resonance NMR , 1991 .

[39]  H. Pfeifer Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy , 1992 .

[40]  F. Harris On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.