A psychometric analysis of information propagation in online social networks using latent trait theory

The paper explores use of psychometric analysis based on latent trait theory to study quality of information propagation in online social networks. The collective intelligence of users of the network could be used to determine credibility of information. We use the latent trait of ability of users to distinguish between true information and misinformation as a measure of social computing in the network. Using repropagation features available in these networks as an affirmation of credibility of information, we build a dichotomous item response matrix which is evaluated using different models in latent trait theory. This enables us to detect presence of misinformation and also evaluate trust of users in the sources of information. Trust between users and sources of information is further used to construct a polytomous matrix. The matrices are evaluated using polytomous latent theory models to evaluate the types of trust and segregate possible collusion of users to spread misinformation. We show experimental results of psychometric analysis carried out in data sets obtained from ‘Twitter’ to support our claim.

[1]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory , 1997 .

[2]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams , 2010, WWW.

[3]  E. Muraki A GENERALIZED PARTIAL CREDIT MODEL: APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM , 1992 .

[4]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  On the Difference or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective , 2006, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[5]  Ron D. Hays,et al.  Assessing quality of life in clinical trials : methods and practice , 2005 .

[6]  Karen E. Fisher,et al.  A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behaviour , 2013, Inf. Res..

[7]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Trust Networks on the Semantic Web , 2003, WWW.

[8]  Jin Ha Lee,et al.  Notes from the underground city of disinformation: A conceptual investigation , 2011, ASIST.

[9]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Misinformation and Its Correction , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[10]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[11]  F. Samejima Graded Response Model , 1997 .

[12]  Cécile Paris,et al.  A survey of trust in social networks , 2013, CSUR.

[13]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Trust on the World Wide Web: A Survey , 2006, Found. Trends Web Sci..

[14]  Frank B. Baker,et al.  Item Response Theory : Parameter Estimation Techniques, Second Edition , 2004 .

[15]  F. Baker,et al.  Item response theory : parameter estimation techniques , 1993 .

[16]  M. De Domenico,et al.  The Anatomy of a Scientific Rumor , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Detecting and Tracking the Spread of Astroturf Memes in Microblog Streams , 2010, ArXiv.

[18]  Sibel Adali,et al.  Measuring behavioral trust in social networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics.

[19]  Alex Byrne,et al.  High-Level Colloquium on Information Literacy and Lifelong LearningBibliotheca Alexandrina, Alexandria, Egypt - Report of Meeting , 2006 .

[20]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? , 2010, SOMA '10.