What Causal Forces Shape Internet Connectivity at the AS-level?

Abstract : Two ASs are connected in the Internet AS graph only if they have a business "peering relationship." By focusing on the AS subgraph ASpc whose links represent provider-customer relationships, we present an empirical study that identifies three crucial causal forces at work in the design of AS connectivity: (i) AS-geography, i.e., locality and number of PoPs (Points-of-Presence) within individual ASs; (ii) AS-specific business models, abstract toy models that describe how individual ASs choose their best provider; and (iii) AS evolution, a historic account of the lives of individual ASs in a dynamic ISP market. Based on these findings that directly relate to how provider-customer relationships may be determined in the actual Internet, we develop a new optimization-driven model for Internet growth at the ASpc level. Its defining feature is an explicit construction of a novel class of intuitive, multi-objective, local optimizations by which the different ASs determine in a fully distributed and decentralized fashion their "best" upstream provider. We show that our model is broadly robust, perforce yields graphs that match inferred AS connectivity with respect to many different metrics, and is ideal for exploring the impact of new peering incentives or policies on AS-level connectivity.

[1]  Doyle,et al.  Power laws, highly optimized tolerance, and generalized source coding , 2000, Physical review letters.

[2]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Does AS size determine degree in as topology? , 2001, CCRV.

[3]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[4]  Ibrahim Matta,et al.  BRITE: an approach to universal topology generation , 2001, MASCOTS 2001, Proceedings Ninth International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems.

[5]  Joao Antonio Pereira,et al.  Linked: The new science of networks , 2002 .

[6]  Lixin Gao On inferring autonomous system relationships in the internet , 2001, TNET.

[7]  Ibrahim Matta,et al.  On the geographic location of internet resources , 2002, IMW '02.

[8]  Abraham Bookstein Informetric distributions, part II: Resilience to ambiguity , 1990 .

[9]  Albert,et al.  Topology of evolving networks: local events and universality , 2000, Physical review letters.

[10]  Jeremy J. Ramsden,et al.  Company size distribution in different countries , 2000 .

[11]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[12]  Pavlin Radoslavov,et al.  An Analysis of The Internal Structure of Large Autonomous Systems , 2002 .

[13]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[14]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  Dynamic Models for File Sizes and Double Pareto Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[15]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Scaling phenomena in the Internet: Critically examining criticality , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. Feldman Welfare economics and social choice theory , 1980 .

[17]  P. M. Shearer,et al.  Zipf Distribution of U . S . Firm Sizes , 2022 .

[18]  Geoff Huston,et al.  Analyzing the Internet's BGP Routing Table , 2001 .

[19]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Toward an optimization-driven framework for designing and generating realistic Internet topologies , 2003, CCRV.

[20]  Lakshminarayanan Subramanian,et al.  An investigation of geographic mapping techniques for internet hosts , 2001, SIGCOMM.

[21]  R. Axtell The Emergence of Firms in a Population of Agents , 1999 .

[22]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Measuring ISP topologies with Rocketfuel , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[23]  Jie Yu,et al.  Heavy tails, generalized coding, and optimal Web layout , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[24]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[25]  J M Carlson,et al.  Highly optimized tolerance: a mechanism for power laws in designed systems. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[26]  Sugih Jamin,et al.  Inet: Internet Topology Generator , 2000 .

[27]  Walter Willinger,et al.  The origin of power laws in Internet topologies revisited , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[28]  Fan Chung Graham,et al.  A random graph model for massive graphs , 2000, STOC '00.