Effect of patient weight and scanning duration on contrast enhancement during pulmonary multidetector CT angiography.

PURPOSE To retrospectively evaluate the amount of contrast medium required with 16- and 64-section computed tomography (CT) for a given patient weight to achieve desirable contrast enhancement during pulmonary CT angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was not required for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty-five patients (35 men, 50 women; range, 22-87 years) who had undergone 16-section (n = 48) or 64-section (n = 37) CT for the detection of pulmonary embolism were retrospectively evaluated. Contrast medium containing 350 mg of iodine per milliliter was injected at a rate of 4 mL/sec. The injected volume corresponded to the injection rate multiplied by the sum of the scanning delay plus the scanning duration, up to 125 mL. The scanning delay was determined with bolus tracking. Contrast enhancement was measured in the main pulmonary artery and the aorta. For each patient, the injected contrast medium volume per body weight index was calculated. Linear regression analysis was performed, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess differences between 16- and 64-section CT. RESULTS A range of patient weights (45.3-153.0 kg) and contrast medium volumes (76-125 mL) were noted. The regression formula indicated that 1.2 mL per kilogram body weight of contrast medium was required to achieve 250 HU. The median scanning duration was shorter for 64-section CT than for 16-section CT (5.7 seconds vs 9.5 seconds, P < .001). Consequently, 64-section CT required 17.6% less contrast medium than did 16-section CT (85.4 mL vs 103.6 mL, P < .001). Median contrast enhancement in the pulmonary artery was 8.9% lower with 64-section CT than with 16-section CT (257.7 HU vs 282.9 HU, P = .11). CONCLUSION To achieve consistent contrast enhancement during pulmonary CT angiography, the amount of contrast medium can be adjusted to the patient's body weight.

[1]  R C Nelson,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  P. Boiselle,et al.  Multi-detector row spiral CT pulmonary angiography: comparison with single-detector row spiral CT. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  J. Remy,et al.  Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Determination of Scan Delay Time in Spiral CT‐Angiography: Utility of a Test Bolus Injection , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Nico Mollet,et al.  Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  C P Langlotz,et al.  Assessment of a bolus-tracking technique in helical renal CT to optimize nephrographic phase imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[7]  K. Bae,et al.  Test-bolus versus bolus-tracking techniques for CT angiographic timing. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  J. Ellis,et al.  Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  D. Fleischmann,et al.  Accuracy of Predicting and Controlling Time-Dependent Aortic Enhancement from a Test Bolus Injection , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  J. Heiken,et al.  Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. , 1995, Radiology.

[11]  P M Silverman,et al.  Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  A Vieillard-Baron,et al.  Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. , 2000, Radiology.

[13]  L. Berland,et al.  Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Alexander Crispin,et al.  Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[15]  B Ghaye,et al.  Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? , 2001, Radiology.

[16]  M Kormano,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. , 1983, Investigative radiology.

[17]  K. Bae,et al.  Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. , 2003, Radiology.

[18]  J. Remy,et al.  CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value , 2002, European Radiology.

[19]  U Joseph Schoepf,et al.  CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: state of the art. , 2004, Radiology.

[20]  L. Washington,et al.  CT for thromboembolic disease. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[21]  P. Dean,et al.  Hepatic CT contrast enhancement: effect of dose, duration of infusion, and time elapsed following infusion. , 1980, Investigative radiology.

[22]  T. Chambers,et al.  Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients. , 1994, Radiology.

[23]  J A Brink,et al.  Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. , 1998, Radiology.

[24]  Optimization of contrast delivery for pulmonary CT angiography. , 1998, Clinical imaging.

[25]  J A Brink,et al.  Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. , 1998, Radiology.