Mapping the fine structure of a eukaryotic promoter input-output function

The precise tuning of gene expression levels is essential for the optimal performance of transcriptional regulatory networks. We created 209 variants of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 promoter to quantify how different binding sites for the transcription factor Pho4 affect its output. We found that transcription-factor binding affinities determined in vitro could quantitatively predict the output of a complex yeast promoter. Promoter output was precisely tunable by subtle changes in binding-site affinity of less than 3 kcal mol−1, which are accessible by modifying 1–2 bases. Our results provide insights into how transcription-factor binding sites regulate gene expression, their possible evolution and how they can be used to precisely tune gene expression. More generally, we show that in vitro binding-energy landscapes of transcription factors can precisely predict the output of a native yeast promoter, indicating that quantitative models of transcriptional regulatory networks are feasible.

[1]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Holly E Sassi,et al.  Functional Dissection of IME1 Transcription Using Quantitative Promoter–Reporter Screening , 2010, Genetics.

[3]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Integrated approaches reveal determinants of genome-wide binding and function of the transcription factor Pho4. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[4]  M. Münsterkötter,et al.  The homeodomain protein Pho2 and the basic-helix-loop-helix protein Pho4 bind DNA cooperatively at the yeast PHO5 promoter. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  Achim Tresch,et al.  Dynamic transcriptome analysis measures rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in yeast , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[6]  Barak A. Cohen,et al.  Complex effects of nucleotide variants in a mammalian cis-regulatory element , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  K. Thorn,et al.  Optimized cassettes for fluorescent protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Yeast.

[8]  M. Münsterkötter,et al.  Cooperative Pho2-Pho4 Interactions at thePHO5 Promoter Are Critical for Binding of Pho4 to UASp1 and for Efficient Transactivation by Pho4 at UASp2 , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[9]  John D. Storey,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  Compensation for differences in gene copy number among yeast ribosomal proteins is encoded within their promoters. , 2011, Genome research.

[11]  Y. Oshima.  The phosphatase system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genes & genetic systems.

[12]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[13]  J. Westwater,et al.  The Mathematics of Diffusion. , 1957 .

[14]  Daniel E. Newburger,et al.  High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. , 2009, Genome research.

[15]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Eran Segal,et al.  Manipulating nucleosome disfavoring sequences allows fine-tune regulation of gene expression in yeast , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  A Synthetic Biology Framework for Programming Eukaryotic Transcription Functions , 2012, Cell.

[18]  John D. Storey,et al.  Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Shawfeng Dong,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the transcription control mechanism , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[20]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Quantitative and predictive model of transcriptional control of the Drosophila melanogaster even skipped gene , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[21]  R. Schiestl,et al.  High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[22]  U. Boschert,et al.  A family of Drosophila serotonin receptors with distinct intracellular signalling properties and expression patterns. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[23]  J. Svaren,et al.  Transcription factors vs nucleosomes: regulation of the PHO5 promoter in yeast. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[24]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Information content of individual genetic sequences. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Panayiotis V. Benos,et al.  STAMP: a web tool for exploring DNA-binding motif similarities , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Y. Kyōgoku,et al.  Crystal structure of PHO4 bHLH domain–DNA complex: flanking base recognition , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[28]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[29]  N. Chaffey.  Red fluorescent protein , 2001 .

[30]  Joseph B Hiatt,et al.  Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Eran Segal,et al.  From DNA sequence to transcriptional behaviour: a quantitative approach , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  Amos Tanay,et al.  Extensive low-affinity transcriptional interactions in the yeast genome. , 2006, Genome research.

[33]  D. J. Greenwood,et al.  RNA:protein ratio of the unicellular organism as a characteristic of phosphorous and nitrogen stoichiometry and of the cellular requirement of ribosomes for protein synthesis , 2006, BMC Biology.

[34]  Stephen R Quake,et al.  Experimental determination of the evolvability of a transcription factor , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Frederick R. Cross,et al.  The effects of molecular noise and size control on variability in the budding yeast cell cycle , 2007, Nature.

[36]  I. Sadowski,et al.  Organizational constraints on Ste12 cis‐elements for a pheromone response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[37]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  Differential binding of the related transcription factors Pho4 and Cbf1 can tune the sensitivity of promoters to different levels of an induction signal , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  ScerTF: a comprehensive database of benchmarked position weight matrices for Saccharomyces species , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  Jason Gertz,et al.  Environment-specific combinatorial cis-regulation in synthetic promoters , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[40]  Eran Segal,et al.  Incorporating Nucleosomes into Thermodynamic Models of Transcription Regulation , 2009, RECOMB.

[41]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[42]  Jay Shendure,et al.  High-resolution analysis of DNA regulatory elements by synthetic saturation mutagenesis , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  C. Leaver,et al.  Nuclear restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower is associated with the tissue‐specific regulation of a novel mitochondrial gene. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[44]  P. Brown,et al.  New components of a system for phosphate accumulation and polyphosphate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic expression analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[45]  J. Schmitz,et al.  A nucleosome precludes binding of the transcription factor Pho4 in vivo to a critical target site in the PHO5 promoter. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[46]  Marcel Geertz,et al.  Experimental strategies for studying transcription factor-DNA binding specificities. , 2010, Briefings in functional genomics.

[47]  C. Goding,et al.  Single amino acid substitutions alter helix‐loop‐helix protein specificity for bases flanking the core CANNTG motif. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[48]  E. O’Shea,et al.  A quantitative model of transcription factor–activated gene expression , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[49]  Erin K O'Shea,et al.  Partially Phosphorylated Pho4 Activates Transcription of a Subset of Phosphate-Responsive Genes , 2003, PLoS biology.

[50]  S. Maerkl,et al.  Rapid synthesis of defined eukaryotic promoter libraries. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[51]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. , 2008, Genome research.

[52]  C. Sevier,et al.  Efficient export of the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein from the endoplasmic reticulum requires a signal in the cytoplasmic tail that includes both tyrosine-based and di-acidic motifs. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[53]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range , 2008, Nature.

[54]  J. Kinney,et al.  Using deep sequencing to characterize the biophysical mechanism of a transcriptional regulatory sequence , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  R. Mitra,et al.  TATA is a modular component of synthetic promoters. , 2010, Genome research.

[56]  E. Siggia,et al.  Analysis of Combinatorial cis-Regulation in Synthetic and Genomic Promoters , 2008, Nature.

[57]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  Explicit equilibrium modeling of transcription-factor binding and gene regulation , 2005, Genome Biology.

[58]  R. Tsien,et al.  Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[59]  Saurabh Sinha,et al.  A probabilistic method to detect regulatory modules , 2003, ISMB.

[60]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Phosphate transport and sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Genetics.

[61]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[62]  Ting Wang,et al.  An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[63]  Derek Y. Chiang,et al.  Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment , 2006, BMC Molecular Biology.