Morphosyntactic cues to noun categorization in English child-directed speech

Abstract Mainstream research in Linguistics claims that grammatical regularities are scarcely represented in the linguistic input to which children are exposed. However, recent empirical research shows that child-directed speech contains a series of reliable cues that might assist young language learners in language development. The present study aims at testing whether English child-directed speech contains morphosyntactic regularities which might be robust enough for infants to group nouns in their grammatical category. The results from the study show that, in fact, the kind of input available to English-learning infants contains reliable and consistent distributional cues to account for most of the nouns to which children are exposed.

[1]  LouAnn Gerken.  Signal to Syntax: Building a Bridge , 2001 .

[2]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Impaired statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in adolescents with specific language impairment , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[3]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning grammatical categories from distributional cues: Flexible frames for language acquisition , 2010, Cognition.

[4]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[5]  L. Gerken,et al.  Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[6]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation , 2005, Cognition.

[7]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[8]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Syntactic categorization in early language acquisition: formalizing the role of distributional analysis , 1997, Cognition.

[9]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  First Language Acquisition , 2002, The Study of Language.

[10]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  From shared contexts to syntactic categories: The role of distributional information in learning linguistic form-classes , 2013, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Nick Chater,et al.  Distributional Information: A Powerful Cue for Acquiring Syntactic Categories , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Nick Chater,et al.  The differential contribution of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. , 2005 .

[13]  more modern multivariate statistical techniques,et al.  Applied Multivariate Research , 2013 .

[14]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[15]  Toben H. Mintz.  Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[16]  M. Maratsos.  More overregularizations after all: new data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen & Xu , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[17]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[18]  P. Jusczyk.  Bootstrapping from the Signal: Some Further Directions , 2001 .

[19]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[20]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory , 1975 .

[21]  E. Bates,et al.  Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Twenty-Three-Month-Old Children Have a Grammatical Category of Noun. , 1993 .

[23]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[24]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.

[25]  Jia Li,et al.  Word categorization from distributional information: Frames confer more than the sum of their (Bigram) parts , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Toben H. Mintz.  Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech , 2003, Cognition.

[27]  Toben H. Mintz,et al.  The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children , 2002 .

[28]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. , 2001, Journal of child language.

[30]  M. Brent.  Advances in the computational study of language acquisition , 1996, Cognition.