A virtual tabletop workspace for the assessment of upper limb function in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Traditional methods of movement assessment in clinical rehab are often labor intensive and provide a limited number of outcome variables for tracking recovery. Entry level virtual reality (VR) systems afford new possibilities for systematic assessment and treatment. This paper describes the development of a virtual tabletop environment for the assessment of upper limb function in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). The system is designed to present realistic virtual workspaces and to measure performance at both a functional and kinematic level. In addition, we incorporate the use of Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) as a means of integrating performance with the workspace. Unlike top-end movement analysis systems, the experimental system utilizes readily available computing technologies: mid-range PC, LCD panels, stereo camera, Virtools software, and TUI enabled by Wii Remote, Wii Sensor Bar (Nintendo¿) and passive markers. The combination of vision-based marker tracking with a low cost game controller (viz Wii system) provides a stable and accurate means of tracking the TUI on the virtual workspace, and for interactivity within this space. The system provides a compelling sense of realism for the performer and an innovative means of assessing movement capabilities over time.

[1]  B. Bobath.  Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment , 1978 .

[2]  Myron W. Krueger,et al.  Artificial reality II , 1991 .

[3]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Analysis of assets for virtual reality applications in neuropsychology , 2004 .

[4]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[5]  J. Ghajar.  Traumatic brain injury , 2000, The Lancet.

[6]  P. Thomas,et al.  A multilevel model for movement rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) using Virtual Environments , 2006, 2006 International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation.

[7]  D. Wolpert.  Computational approaches to motor control , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  F. Garbarini,et al.  At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[10]  J. Eng,et al.  Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  K. Jellinger.  Motor Cognition What Actions Tell the Self , 2007 .

[12]  E. Edmonds,et al.  The Creative Process Where the Artist is Amplified or Superseded by the Computer , 1973 .

[13]  Barbara A. Wilson,et al.  8.20 – Traumatic Brain Injury , 1998 .

[14]  Maureen K. Holden,et al.  Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Bricks: laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces , 1995, CHI '95.

[16]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[17]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self , 2006 .

[18]  S. Page,et al.  Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.