Simulating historical flood events at the continental scale: observational validation of a large-scale hydrodynamic model

Abstract. Continental–global-scale flood hazard models simulate design floods, i.e. theoretical flood events of a given probability. Since they output phenomena unobservable in reality, large-scale models are typically compared to more localised engineering models to evidence their accuracy. However, both types of model may share the same biases and so not validly illustrate their predictive skill. Here, we adapt an existing continental-scale design flood framework of the contiguous US to simulate historical flood events. A total of 35 discrete events are modelled and compared to observations of flood extent, water level, and inundated buildings. Model performance was highly variable, depending on the flood event chosen and validation data used. While all events were accurately replicated in terms of flood extent, some modelled water levels deviated substantially from those measured in the field. Despite this, the model generally replicated the observed flood events in the context of terrain data vertical accuracy, extreme discharge measurement uncertainties, and observational field data errors. This analysis highlights the continually improving fidelity of large-scale flood hazard models, yet also evidences the need for considerable advances in the accuracy of routinely collected field and high-river flow data in order to interrogate flood inundation models more comprehensively.

[1]  I. Bolliger,et al.  Combined Modeling of US Fluvial, Pluvial, and Coastal Flood Hazard Under Current and Future Climates , 2020, Water Resources Research.

[2]  I. Bolliger,et al.  Combined modelling of US fluvial, pluvial and coastal flood hazard under current and future climates , 2020 .

[3]  B. Karlin,et al.  Collaborative Modeling With Fine‐Resolution Data Enhances Flood Awareness, Minimizes Differences in Flood Perception, and Produces Actionable Flood Maps , 2020, Earth's Future.

[4]  C. Sampson,et al.  A New Automated Method for Improved Flood Defense Representation in Large‐Scale Hydraulic Models , 2019, Water Resources Research.

[5]  R. Paiva,et al.  Can regional to continental river hydrodynamic models be locally relevant? A cross-scale comparison , 2019, Journal of Hydrology X.

[6]  K. Schröter,et al.  Simulation of flood hazard and risk in the Danube basin with the Future Danube Model , 2018, Climate Services.

[7]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Implications of Simulating Global Digital Elevation Models for Flood Inundation Studies , 2018, Water Resources Research.

[8]  R. Dymond,et al.  Results from Operational Hydrologic Forecasts Using the NOAA/NWS OHRFC Ohio River Community HEC-RAS Model , 2018, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering.

[9]  Amir AghaKouchak,et al.  Going beyond the Flood Insurance Rate Map: insights from flood hazard map co-production , 2017 .

[10]  Kris A. Johnson,et al.  Validation of a 30 m resolution flood hazard model of the conterminous United States , 2017 .

[11]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas , 2017, Nature Climate Change.

[12]  P. Bates,et al.  Quantifying local rainfall dynamics and uncertain boundary conditions into a nested regional‐local flood modeling system , 2017 .

[13]  C. Kousky.  Disasters as Learning Experiences or Disasters as Policy Opportunities? Examining Flood Insurance Purchases after Hurricanes , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  P. Bates,et al.  The effects of spatial resolution and dimensionality on modeling regional‐scale hydraulics in a multichannel river , 2017 .

[15]  Delwyn Moller,et al.  AirSWOT measurements of river water surface elevation and slope: Tanana River, AK , 2017 .

[16]  L. Feyen,et al.  Development and evaluation of a framework for global flood hazard mapping , 2016 .

[17]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Global drivers of future river flood risk , 2016 .

[18]  P. Bates,et al.  Calibration of channel depth and friction parameters in the LISFLOOD-FP hydraulic model using medium resolution SAR data , 2016 .

[19]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Assessing the reliability of probabilistic flood inundation model predictions , 2015 .

[20]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  A high‐resolution global flood hazard model† , 2015, Water resources research.

[21]  P. J. Smith,et al.  A novel framework for discharge uncertainty quantification applied to 500 UK gauging stations , 2015, Water resources research.

[22]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Regional flood frequency analysis at the global scale , 2015 .

[23]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Problems with binary pattern measures for flood model evaluation , 2014 .

[24]  P. Bates,et al.  Advances in pan‐European flood hazard mapping , 2014 .

[25]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households , 2014 .

[26]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Flooding dynamics on the lower Amazon floodplain: 1. Hydraulic controls on water elevation, inundation extent, and river‐floodplain discharge , 2014 .

[27]  P. Bates,et al.  A first large‐scale flood inundation forecasting model , 2013 .

[28]  J. Freer,et al.  Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality , 2012 .

[29]  P. Bates,et al.  A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas , 2012 .

[30]  W. Botzen,et al.  A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  H. Winsemius,et al.  A framework for global river flood risk assessments , 2012 .

[32]  P. Bates,et al.  The impact of uncertainty in satellite data on the assessment of flood inundation models , 2012 .

[33]  P. Bates,et al.  The accuracy of sequential aerial photography and SAR data for observing urban flood dynamics, a case study of the UK summer 2007 floods , 2011 .

[34]  J. Neal,et al.  Evaluating a new LISFLOOD‐FP formulation with data from the summer 2007 floods in Tewkesbury, UK , 2011 .

[35]  S. Kanae,et al.  A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model , 2011 .

[36]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. , 2010 .

[37]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Modelling the hydraulics of the Carlisle 2005 flood event , 2010 .

[38]  A. Montanari,et al.  Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis , 2009 .

[39]  Francesco Dottori,et al.  A dynamic rating curve approach to indirect discharge measurement , 2009 .

[40]  P. Bates,et al.  Distributed whole city water level measurements from the Carlisle 2005 urban flood event and comparison with hydraulic model simulations , 2009 .

[41]  P. Bates,et al.  Calibration of uncertain flood inundation models using remotely sensed water levels. , 2009 .

[42]  P. Bates,et al.  A technique for the calibration of hydraulic models using uncertain satellite observations of flood extent , 2009 .

[43]  Heiko Apel,et al.  Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? , 2009 .

[44]  P. Bates,et al.  Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flooding , 2008 .

[45]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Improving River Flood Extent Delineation From Synthetic Aperture Radar Using Airborne Laser Altimetry , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[46]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Deriving distributed roughness values from satellite radar data for flood inundation modelling , 2007 .

[47]  Patrick Matgen,et al.  Integration of SAR-derived river inundation areas, high-precision topographic data and a river flow model toward near real-time flood management , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[48]  Graham A. Tobin,et al.  Efficient and effective? The 100-year flood in the communication and perception of flood risk , 2007 .

[49]  Keith Beven,et al.  Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions. , 2006 .

[50]  P. Bates,et al.  Reach scale floodplain inundation dynamics observed using airborne synthetic aperture radar imagery: Data analysis and modelling , 2006 .

[51]  Keith Beven,et al.  Fuzzy set approach to calibrating distributed flood inundation models using remote sensing observations , 2006 .

[52]  A. Paquier,et al.  Modeling floods in a dense urban area using 2D shallow water equations , 2006 .

[53]  K. Beven,et al.  Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations , 2005 .

[54]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Distributed Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Inundation Model Calibration , 2005 .

[55]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Floodplain friction parameterization in two‐dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry , 2003 .

[56]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation , 2002 .

[57]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE , 2002 .

[58]  Glenn R. Harwell,et al.  Characterization of peak streamflows and flood inundation of selected areas in southeastern Texas and southwestern Louisiana from the August and September 2017 flood resulting from Hurricane Harvey , 2018 .

[59]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the U.S. Geological Survey National Elevation Dataset, and comparison with other large-area elevation datasets: SRTM and ASTER , 2014 .

[60]  C. Sampson,et al.  Benchmarking urban flood models of varying complexity and scale using high resolution terrestrial LiDAR data , 2011 .

[61]  Liu Xinwu.  This is How the Discussion Started , 1981 .