N-backer: An auditory n-back task with automatic scoring of spoken responses

The n-back task is commonly used to load working memory (WM) in dual-task and neuroimaging experiments. However, it typically involves visual presentation and buttonpress responses, making it unsuitable for combination with primary tasks that involve vision and action, such as sequential object use and other tasks of daily living. The N-backer software presented here will automatically present and score auditory–verbal n-back sequences utilising the standard speech synthesis and recognition facilities that come with Microsoft Windows. Data are presented from an experiment in which 12 student participants carried out three tasks from the Naturalistic Action Test (NAT) while their attention was divided between the primary task and a continuous auditory–verbal 2-back secondary task. The participants’ 2-back performance was scored in two ways: by hand, from video recordings, and automatically, using the software, allowing us to evaluate the accuracy of N-backer. There was an extremely high correlation between these scores (.933). The videos were also used to obtain a comprehensive error score for the NAT. Significantly more errors were made in the more complex NAT tasks when participants were 2-backing, as compared with when they were not, showing that the auditory–verbal n-back task can be used to disrupt sequential object use. This dual-task method may simulate the attentional deficits of patients with brain injury, providing insights into the difficulties they face in tasks of daily living.

[1]  J. Jonides,et al.  Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  J. Duncan,et al.  Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Exploring multimodal semantic control impairments in semantic aphasia: Evidence from naturalistic object use , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Tania Giovannetti,et al.  Coffee with jelly or unbuttered toast: commissions and omissions are dissociable aspects of everyday action impairment in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Neuropsychology.

[5]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  The Coffee Challenge: A new method for the study of everyday action errors , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working memory and binding in sentence recall , 2009 .

[7]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored , 2007, Cognition.

[10]  Tania Giovannetti,et al.  Everyday action in dementia: Evidence for differential deficits in Alzheimer's disease versus subcortical vascular dementia , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[11]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Problems people with dementia have with kitchen tasks: The challenge for pervasive computing , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[12]  Michael W. Montgomery,et al.  Naturalistic action impairment in closed head injury. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[13]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Working Memory for Letters, Shapes, and Locations: fMRI Evidence against Stimulus-Based Regional Organization in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2000, NeuroImage.

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Comparing action disorganization syndrome and dual-task load on normal performance in everyday action tasks , 2009, Neurocase.

[15]  S. Jaeggi,et al.  The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure , 2010, Memory.