COMPARISON OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS AND VECTORCARDIOGRAMS IN CONGENITAL AORTIC STENOSIS*†

In a previous study (Hugenholtz, Lees, and Nadas, 1962) correlations between the resting hemodynamic state in congenital aortic stenosis (AS) and the cube vectorcardiogram showed great accuracy in predicting the presence of left ventricular hypertension. Results were better than those obtained by the standard electrocardiogram in a study of a larger group of similar patients (Braunwald et al., 1963). Furthermore, alterations in the direction and magnitude of specific QRS vectors, as projected on the horizontal plane, correlated to some degree with left ventricular peak pressure and aortic gradient. However, the wide variation in these measurements often made proper assessment of the individual case impossible. Thus, while distinctly better than the standard electrocardiogram in the recognition of left ventricular hypertension, this type of uncorrected vectorcardiographic recording still proved to be inferior to the assessment of severity obtained by means of cardiac catheterization. The lead system proposed by Frank (1956) possesses characteristics which, on theoretical grounds, would make it a more desirable system for registration of the " equivalent dipole " (Langner et al., 1958). In practical terms it has confirmed these expectations in sharper delineation of the normal (Hugenholtz and Liebman, 1962), in improved accuracy in the necropsy confirmed diagnosis of various myocardial disorders (Hugenholtz, Forkner, and Levine, 1961), and in the assessment of left and right ventricular hypertension in patients with congenital aortic and pulmonic stenosis (Hugenholtz and Gamboa, 1964). It appeared timely therefore to compare its usefulness to that of the standard electrocardiogram and the cube vectorcardiogram obtained simultaneously in the same patient. The availability of detailed hmmodynamic data such as left ventricular peak systolic pressure, aortic valve gradient, stroke work, and valve area, suggested the study of these factors and their relation to electrical depolarization. The age-groups studied (5 to 21j years) appeared particularly useful since complicating factors such as conduction defects or coronary artery disease were absent. Heart weight or wall thickness at necropsy, the traditional yard-sticks, which in previous studies had shown a less than satisfactory correlation with the cardiogram (Griep, 1959; Scott, 1960; Selzer et al., 1958), were not analysed.

[1]  O. H. Schmitt,et al.  The present status of vectorcardiography. , 1955, A.M.A. archives of internal medicine.

[2]  R. C. Scott The Correlation Between the Electrocardiographic Patterns of Ventricular Hypertrophy and the Anatomic Findings , 1960, Circulation.

[3]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  A Clinical Appraisal of the Vectorcardiogram in Myocardial Infarction: II. The Frank System , 1961, Circulation.

[4]  H. Pipberger Die Bedeutung der orthogonalen Elektrokardiographie und Vektorkardiographie für die klinische Kardiologie , 1958 .

[5]  H. C. Burger,et al.  HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. , 1948, British heart journal.

[6]  H. C. Burger,et al.  HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. , 1946, British heart journal.

[7]  A. Grimm,et al.  Properties of Myocardium in Cardiomegaly , 1963, Circulation research.

[8]  J. Forman [CONGENITAL AORTIC STENOSIS]. , 1964, La Revue du praticien.

[9]  J. Bristow,et al.  Observations with the Frank system of vectorcardiography in left ventricular hypertrophy. , 1961, American heart journal.

[10]  A. Wallace,et al.  The vectorcardiogram in left ventricular hypertrophy , 1962 .

[11]  A. Selzer,et al.  Reliability of Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy , 1958, Circulation.

[12]  N. Fowler,et al.  A simplified method for determining the angle between two spatial vectors. , 1953, American heart journal.

[13]  A. P. Spivack,et al.  The calculated tempero-spatial heart vector in proved isolated left ventricular overwork. , 1962, American heart journal.

[14]  A. H. Griep Pitfalls in the Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: A Correlative Study of 200 Autopsied Patients , 1959, Circulation.

[15]  O. H. Schmitt,et al.  SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY AND VECTORCARDIOGRAPHY: The Present Status of Vectorcardiography , 1955 .

[16]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Congenital Aortic Stenosis: I. Clinical and Hemodynamic Findings in 100 Patients; II. Surgical Treatment and the Results of Operation , 1963 .

[17]  R. Gamboa,et al.  Effect of Chronically Increased Ventricular Pressure on Electrical Forces of the Heart: A Correlation between Hemodynamic and Vectorcardiographic Data (Frank System) in 90 Patients with Aortic or Pulmonic Stenosis , 1964, Circulation.

[18]  A. Wallace,et al.  The vector-cardiogram in left ventricular hypertrophy. A study using the Frank lead system. , 1962, American Heart Journal.

[19]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  The Scalar Electrocardiogram, Vectorcardiogram, and Exercise Electrocardiogram in the Assessment of Congenital Aortic Stenosis , 1962, Circulation.

[20]  H. C. Burger,et al.  HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. Part II , 1947, British heart journal.

[21]  Comparison of Four Orthogonal Systems of Vectorcardiography , 1958, Circulation.

[22]  C. Walker,et al.  Importance of age, sex and body habitus in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy from the precordial electrocardiogram in childhood and adolescence. , 1961, Pediatrics.

[23]  A. Selzer,et al.  Electrocardiographic findings in concentric and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy. , 1962, American heart journal.

[24]  H. Pipberger,et al.  CORRELATIONS BETWEEN RADIOLOGIC HEART SIZE AND ORTHOGONAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR OVERLOAD. , 1964, American heart journal.

[25]  A J LINZBACH,et al.  Heart failure from the point of view of quantitative anatomy. , 1960, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  E. Cabrera,et al.  Systolic and diastolic loading of the heart. I. Physiologic and clinical data. , 1952, American heart journal.

[27]  E. Frank An Accurate, Clinically Practical System For Spatial Vectorcardiography , 1956, Circulation.

[28]  J. Liebman,et al.  The Orthogonal Vectorcardiogram in 100 Normal Children (Frank System): With Some Comparative Data Recorded by the Cube System , 1962, Circulation.

[29]  R. Monroe,et al.  Myocardial Oxygen Consumption During Ventricular Contraction and Relaxation , 1964, Circulation research.

[30]  G. Whipple,et al.  A Clinical Appraisal of the Vectorcardiogram in Myocardial Infarction: I. The Cube System , 1961, Circulation.