RETRACTED: The visual word form area is organized according to orthography

Efficient word reading depends on a left fusiform brain region, the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA). The internal organization of this brain area is currently unknown, as are the potential factors that might underlie this organization. Here we combine functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with multi-voxel pattern analyses (MVPA) to probe the internal organization of the VWFA. Our findings reveal distinct activation patterns in the VWFA associated with individual letter strings, as well as for pictures. This result demonstrates that the VWFA is organized in such a way that similar words (as well as pictures) activate neurons consistently, irrespective of their exact visual appearance or location. The activation patterns for letter strings were driven primarily by orthographic similarity, and we observed no effects of semantics or lexical status (words versus pseudowords). This effect of orthographic similarity was significant only in the VWFA and not in retinotopic areas and object-selective control regions. Given the relationships between the internal organization and how visual input is processed in a brain region, our findings provide important constraints for computational models of how visual word forms are represented in the brain.

[1]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Evidence for developmental changes in the visual word processing network beyond adolescence , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  Martin Kronbichler,et al.  A dual-route perspective on brain activation in response to visual words: Evidence for a length by lexicality interaction in the visual word form area (VWFA) , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Direct Intracranial, fMRI, and Lesion Evidence for the Causal Role of Left Inferotemporal Cortex in Reading , 2006, Neuron.

[4]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[5]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Laurie S. Glezer,et al.  Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2009, Neuron.

[7]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Silhouette and Outline Versions , 2007, Perception.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  B. Wandell,et al.  Differential sensitivity to words and shapes in ventral occipito-temporal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Keiji Tanaka Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[13]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  M. Sigman,et al.  The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Multivariate Patterns in Object-Selective Cortex Dissociate Perceptual and Physical Shape Similarity , 2008, PLoS biology.

[17]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[18]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Using multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data to interpret overlapping functional activations , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Distributed subordinate specificity for bodies, faces, and buildings in human ventral visual cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  D. Chklovskii,et al.  Maps in the brain: what can we learn from them? , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  Encoding in the Visual Word Form Area: An fMRI Adaptation Study of Words versus Handwriting , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  H. Tamura,et al.  Horizontal interactions between visual cortical neurones studied by cross‐correlation analysis in the cat. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  R. Goebel,et al.  Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  A Locus in Human Extrastriate Cortex for Visual Shape Analysis , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Hidenao Fukuyama,et al.  Longitudinal fMRI study of reading in a patient with letter-by-letter reading , 2008, Cortex.

[28]  B. Zemelman,et al.  The columnar and laminar organization of inhibitory connections to neocortical excitatory cells , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  C. Price,et al.  The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Q. Gong,et al.  Transforming a left lateral fusiform region into VWFA through training in illiterate adults , 2010 .

[31]  Thomas Serre,et al.  Reading the mind's eye: Decoding category information during mental imagery , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[33]  S. Dehaene,et al.  How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language , 2010, Science.

[34]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Cluster Analysis in Higher Education Research , 2005 .

[36]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in their commonly experienced configurations , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[38]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Mingxia Zhang,et al.  The “visual word form area” is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces , 2010, NeuroImage.

[41]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  The role of the extrastriate body area in action perception , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[42]  J. C. Smart,et al.  Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research , 2001, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research.

[43]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The myth of the visual word form area , 2003, NeuroImage.

[44]  Jia Liu,et al.  Talk to the hand: The visual word form area responds to bodies and faces , 2010 .

[45]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area , 2004, NeuroImage.

[47]  Dirk B. Walther,et al.  Natural Scene Categories Revealed in Distributed Patterns of Activity in the Human Brain , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.