An Event Semantics with Continuations for Incremental Interpretation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Lucas Champollion,et al. The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics , 2015 .
[2] H. Grice. Logic and conversation , 1975 .
[3] G. Altmann,et al. The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing , 2007 .
[4] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Constraint Satisfaction Accounts of Lexical and Sentence Comprehension , 2006 .
[5] Adrian Brasoveanu,et al. Incremental and predictive interpretation : Experimental evidence and possible accounts , 2015 .
[6] Emmon Bach,et al. The algebra of events , 1986, The Language of Time - A Reader.
[7] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[8] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[9] D. Sperber,et al. Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .
[10] Matthew R. Bennett. A response to Karttunen on questions , 1977 .
[11] Vera Demberg,et al. The semantic augmentation of a psycholinguistically-motivated syntactic formalism , 2013, CMCL.
[12] Chris Barker,et al. Continuations and Natural Language , 2014, Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics.
[13] C. Barker. Continuations and the Nature of Quantification , 2002 .
[14] Anna Szabolcsi,et al. Quantification and ACD: What is the Evidence from Real-Time Processing Evidence for? A Response to Hackl et al. (2012) , 2014, J. Semant..
[15] Colin M. Brown,et al. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[16] Laura Kallmeyer,et al. Flexible Composition In Ltag: Quantifier Scope and Inverse Linking , 2008 .
[17] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[18] Daiko Takahashi,et al. Determiner Raising and Scope Shift , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.
[19] Mark Steedman,et al. The syntactic process , 2004, Language, speech, and communication.
[20] Adrian Brasoveanu,et al. At-issue Proposals and Appositive Impositions in Discourse , 2015, J. Semant..
[21] Wolfgang Klein,et al. Time in language , 1994 .
[22] Godehard Link. The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .
[23] Irene Heim,et al. Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .
[24] Natalie M. Klein,et al. “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment , 2010, Cognition.
[25] Zeno Vendler,et al. Verbs and Times , 1957, The Language of Time - A Reader.
[26] Oliver Bott,et al. The Processing Domain of Scope Interaction , 2015, J. Semant..
[27] Manfred Krifka,et al. Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics , 1989 .
[28] Yuki Kamide,et al. Anticipatory Processes in Sentence Processing , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[29] D. Sperber,et al. Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .
[30] Bonnie L. Webber,et al. Tense as Discourse Anaphor , 1988, CL.
[31] L. Osterhout,et al. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .
[32] Katherine A. DeLong,et al. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[33] Manfred Krifka,et al. Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution , 1992 .
[34] C. F. M. Vermeulen. Incremental Semantics for Propositional Texts , 1994, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..
[35] Jorie Koster-Hale,et al. Quantification and ACD: Evidence from Real-Time Sentence Processing , 2012, J. Semant..
[36] Yoad Winter,et al. Event Semantics and Abstract Categorial Grammar , 2011, MOL.
[37] C. Barker,et al. Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding , 2008 .
[38] Philippe de Groote,et al. Towards a Montagovian Account of Dynamics , 2006 .
[39] Hana Filip,et al. Telicity as a Semantic Parameter , 2006 .
[40] Oliver Bott,et al. Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Processing of Aspect , 2014 .
[41] Terence Parsons,et al. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .
[42] W. Kintsch. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.
[43] Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al. Introduction to semantics : an essential guide to the composition of meaning , 2013 .
[44] Hana Filip Northwestern. The Quantization Puzzle , 2001 .
[45] Susan Rothstein,et al. INCREMENTAL HOMOGENEITY IN THE SEMANTICS OF ASPECTUAL FOR-PHRASES , 2008 .
[46] M. Krifka. The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .
[47] Mark Steedman,et al. Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.
[48] Masaya Yoshida,et al. Incremental Processing of Coreference and Binding in Japanese , 2009 .
[49] David R. Dowty. Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-Constituent Conjunction , 1988 .
[50] Herbert H. Clark,et al. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures , 1972 .
[51] Jeroen Groenendijk,et al. Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .
[52] Mark Steedman,et al. On not being led up the garden path : The use of context by the psychological syntax processor , 1985 .
[53] Oliver Bott,et al. The cross-linguistic processing of aspect – an eyetracking study on the time course of aspectual interpretation in Russian and German , 2015 .
[54] L. Faust,et al. Aspect An Introduction To The Study Of Verbal Aspect And Related Problems , 2016 .
[55] Oliver Bott,et al. The Processing of Events , 2010 .
[56] Robert F. Port,et al. Dynamics of Language , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.
[57] Frank Keller,et al. Incremental, Predictive Parsing with Psycholinguistically Motivated Tree-Adjoining Grammar , 2013, CL.
[58] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[59] David I. Beaver,et al. On the logic of verbal modification , 2007 .
[60] Barbara H. Partee,et al. Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English , 2008 .
[61] Lutz Marten,et al. The Dynamics of Language , 2005 .
[62] Philippe Schlenker,et al. Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection , 2008 .
[63] B. Partee. Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English , 1973 .
[64] Heather J. Ferguson,et al. Investigating the timecourse of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation , 2013 .
[65] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events , 2005, Cognition.
[66] Lucas Champollion. Parts of a Whole: Distributivity as a Bridge between Aspect and Measurement , 2017 .
[67] Giosuè Baggio,et al. Processing Temporal Constraints: An ERP Study. , 2008 .
[68] Regine Eckardt. A Logic for Easy Linking Semantics , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.