Attitudes to innovation in peripheral economic regions

The objective of this study is to shed light on the identification of the internal and external factors that affect the attitudes towards innovation of companies located in regions situated on the periphery of economic centres. The main research questions are as follows: (1) What are the internal factors that predispose companies to seek access to innovation? (2) To what extent do external factors such as location and technological opportunities condition or stimulate favourable attitudes towards innovation? To test the hypotheses put forward to answer these questions, we formulate and estimate econometric specifications, taking a sample of more than 2000 companies situated in Andalusia (one of the less-favoured regions in Spain). Our results show that the cost of innovation and the level of indebtedness of a company have a statistically significant and negative effect on attitudes to innovation, whereas the technical qualifications of the employees, the propensity to export, and the company size (measured by the number of employees) have a significant and positive effect on a company's attitude towards innovation. Furthermore, technological opportunities and location exert positive effects on attitudes towards innovation.

[1]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies: Economic Performance in Europe , 1999 .

[2]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[3]  Christopher Palmberg,et al.  The sources of innovations – looking beyond technological opportunities , 2004 .

[4]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Innovation and growth , 1984 .

[5]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[6]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[7]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Diversification Strategy and R&D Intensity in Multiproduct Firms , 1989 .

[8]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Managerial Incentives and Investment in R&D in Large Multiproduct Firms , 1993 .

[9]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses , 1985 .

[10]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? , 2003 .

[11]  John T. Scott,et al.  Market Structure and Technological Change , 1987 .

[12]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation , 2000 .

[13]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[14]  N. Noorderhaven,et al.  Entrepreneurial attitude and economic growth: A cross-section of 54 regions , 2004 .

[15]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria , 2003 .

[16]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[17]  S. Negassi,et al.  R&D co-operation and innovation a microeconometric study on French firms , 2004 .

[18]  Steve H. Barr,et al.  Propensity to adopt technological innovations: the impact of personal characteristics and organizational context , 1999 .

[19]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Innovation and the evolution of industries , 2006 .

[20]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change , 1995 .

[22]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[23]  Linda A. Hall,et al.  A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry , 2002 .

[24]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[25]  Mikel Buesa,et al.  Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region , 1996 .

[26]  Ha Henny Romijn,et al.  Firm-level knowledge accumulation and regional dynamics , 2003 .

[27]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[28]  Vipul K. Gupta,et al.  Technological innovations: a framework for communicating diffusion effects , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Y. Georgellis,et al.  What Makes a Region Entrepreneurial ? Evidence from Britain , 1999 .

[30]  E. Waarts,et al.  The dynamics of factors affecting the adoption of innovations , 2002 .

[31]  V. Y. Lin,et al.  Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry-A Specification Error Approach , 1977 .

[32]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose.  INNOVATION PRONE AND INNOVATION AVERSE SOCIETIES: THE PASSAGE FROM R&D TO ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN EUROPE , 1999 .

[33]  Gerald A. Carlino,et al.  Urban Density and the Rate of Invention , 2006 .

[34]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment , 1992 .

[35]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[37]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[38]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[39]  Frances Stewart,et al.  How significant are externalities for development , 1991 .

[40]  Ira Horowitz,et al.  Firm Size and Research Activity , 1962 .

[41]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity , 2000 .

[42]  P. Beneito.  Choosing among alternative technological strategies: an empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation , 2003 .

[43]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[44]  Almas Heshmati,et al.  Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: : A firm-level innovation study , 2002 .

[45]  Rongxin Chen,et al.  Technological Expansion: the Interaction Between Diversification Strategy and Organizational Capability , 1996 .

[46]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: sources and incentives , 1999 .

[47]  Regional variations in firm formation: Panel and cross-section data evidence from Finland , 2000 .

[48]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[49]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[50]  Isabel Suárez González,et al.  A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities , 1999 .

[51]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[52]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Research notes and communications corporate restructuring and strategic change: The effect on diversification strategy and R & D intensity , 1992 .

[53]  Enrique Claver,et al.  Organizational culture for innovation and new technological behavior , 1998 .

[54]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983 , 1989 .

[55]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Industrial Research and Development Expenditures: Determinants, Prospects, and Relation to Size of Firm and Inventive Output , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[56]  R. F. Lovelace,et al.  Stimulating creativity through managerial intervention , 1986 .

[57]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[58]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technology and the Economy , 2002 .

[59]  Athanasios Hadjimanolis,et al.  A Resource-based View of Innovativeness in Small Firms , 2000 .

[60]  Kurt A. Heppard,et al.  An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation , 2003 .

[61]  James S. Worley.  Industrial Research and the New Competition , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.

[62]  Magali A. Delmas,et al.  Innovating against European rigidities , 2002 .

[63]  Ha Henny Romijn,et al.  Determinants of innovation capability in small UK firms: an empirical analysis , 2000 .

[64]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry , 1993 .

[65]  Frank Go,et al.  Service Innovation in Hong Kong: Attitudes and Practice , 1998 .

[66]  J. Galende,et al.  Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour , 2003 .

[67]  Andrew B. Hargadon.  Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[68]  Larry Willmore,et al.  Technological Imports and Technological Effort: An Analysis of Their Determinants in Brazilian Firms , 1991 .

[69]  F. Moulaert,et al.  Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey , 2003 .

[70]  Guido Nassimbeni,et al.  Technology, innovation capacity, and the export attitude of small manufacturing firms: a logit/tobit model , 2001 .

[71]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  What are Innovative Opportunities? , 2007 .

[72]  Terrence C. Sebora,et al.  Innovative activity in small businesses: Competitive context and organization level , 1994 .

[73]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  University spillovers and new firm location , 2005 .

[74]  Thomas Zwick.  Training and firm productivity - panel evidence for Germany , 2002 .