SENSE with improved tolerance to inaccuracies in coil sensitivity maps

In this work, an extension of the Cartesian sensitivity encoding (SENSE) parallel imaging framework is proposed. In the well‐known SENSE solution, the overdetermined reconstruction inversion problem is optimized to get the highest signal‐to‐noise ratio in the image. In this extension, the probability of artifacts due to incorrect knowledge of the receiver coil sensitivities is also taken into account. This is realized by assuming an uncertainty in measured receiver coil sensitivities to enable weighting of residual artifact level and signal‐to‐noise ratio in the inversion problem. This inversion problem can still be solved by a least‐squares optimization without the need of any complex iterative scheme. Results in abdominal imaging show that artifact levels can be substantially reduced, at the cost of a signal‐to‐noise ratio penalty. The size of the signal‐to‐noise ratio penalty depends on the assumed inaccuracy of the coil sensitivities, sensitivity encoding acceleration factor, and coil configuration. Magn Reson Med, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  M. Lustig,et al.  SPIRiT: Iterative self‐consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k‐space , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Feedback Regularization for SENSE Reconstruction , 2002 .

[3]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Autocalibrated coil sensitivity estimation for parallel imaging , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  Stefan Skare,et al.  Comparison of reconstruction accuracy and efficiency among autocalibrating data‐driven parallel imaging methods , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Peter Börnert,et al.  Parallel magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Neurotherapeutics.

[6]  M. Elad,et al.  An EigenVector Approach to AutoCalibrating Parallel MRI , Where SENSE Meets GRAPPA , 2010 .

[7]  F. Huang,et al.  High‐pass GRAPPA: An image support reduction technique for improved partially parallel imaging , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Dana H Brooks,et al.  Using GRAPPA to improve autocalibrated coil sensitivity estimation for the SENSE family of parallel imaging reconstruction algorithms , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  L. Ying,et al.  On Tikhonov regularization for image reconstruction in parallel MRI , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  A tour of accelerated parallel MR imaging from a linear systems perspective , 2005 .

[11]  D. Kacher,et al.  Sensitivity profiles from an array of coils for encoding and reconstruction in parallel (SPACE RIP) , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  W. Manning,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Eugene G Kholmovski,et al.  Evaluation of motion effects on parallel MR imaging with precalibration. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  P M Jakob,et al.  VD‐AUTO‐SMASH imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Peter M. Jakob,et al.  AUTO-SMASH: A self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging , 1998, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[17]  Chris R. Johnson,et al.  POCSENSE: POCS‐based reconstruction for sensitivity encoded magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Leslie Ying,et al.  Joint image reconstruction and sensitivity estimation in SENSE (JSENSE) , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Mark Bydder,et al.  Generalized SMASH imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  M. Nittka,et al.  Partially parallel imaging with localized sensitivities (PILS) , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.