Interpolation of finite rotations in flexible multi-body dynamics simulations

The representation and manipulation of finite rotations and the modelling of flexible bodies are at the heart of flexible multi-body systems dynamics simulations. When dealing with finite element formulations, the interpolation of finite-rotation fields becomes a critical issue. Objectivity, i.e. the invariance of interpolated strain fields to the addition of a rigid body motion, has been an important problem. Furthermore, the manipulation of finite rotations and the unavoidable associated singularities must be dealt in a rational manner. The various approaches to these two problems are reviewed in this article. Simple algorithms that achieve objectivity are proposed. Furthermore, these algorithms can deal with finite rotations of arbitrary large magnitude through a simple rescaling operation. The choice of unknowns, total versus incremental, is also discussed as it affects the performance of the computational process. Numerical examples are presented, which demonstrate the ability of the proposed approach to handle finite rotations of arbitrary magnitudes in complex, flexible multi-body systems.

[1]  H. L. Hime.  “The Elements of Quaternions” , 1894, Nature.

[2]  Thomas Freud. Wiener,et al.  Theoretical analysis of gimballess inertial reference equipment using delta-modulated instruments , 1962 .

[3]  M. Géradin,et al.  Kinematics and dynamics of rigid and flexible mechanisms using finite elements and quaternion algebra , 1988 .

[4]  Roger A. Wehage.  Quaternions and Euler Parameters — A Brief Exposition , 1984 .

[5]  M. Shuster.  A survey of attitude representation , 1993 .

[6]  Leonhard Euler.  Methodus inveniendi lineas curvas maximi minimive proprietate gaudentes, sive solutio problematis isoperimetrici latissimo sensu accepti , 2013, 1307.7187.

[7]  P. Betsch,et al.  A DAE Approach to Flexible Multibody Dynamics , 2002 .

[8]  A. Ibrahimbegovic,et al.  Computational aspects of vector-like parametrization of three-dimensional finite rotations , 1995 .

[9]  M. Crisfield.  A consistent co-rotational formulation for non-linear, three-dimensional, beam-elements , 1990 .

[10]  K. Bathe.  Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[11]  Malcolm D. Shuster.  Survey of attitude representations , 1993 .

[12]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[13]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  On the role of frame-invariance in structural mechanics models at finite rotations , 2002 .

[14]  K. Spring.  Euler parameters and the use of quaternion algebra in the manipulation of finite rotations: A review , 1986 .

[15]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  O. Bauchau,et al.  The Vectorial Parameterization of Rotation , 2003 .

[17]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  The interpolation of rotations and its application to finite element models of geometrically exact rods , 2004 .

[18]  O. Bauchau.  Computational Schemes for Flexible, Nonlinear Multi-Body Systems , 1998 .

[19]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments , 1997 .

[20]  A. Shabana.  Computer Implementation of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for Flexible Multibody Dynamics , 1998 .

[21]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I , 1985 .

[22]  M. Géradin,et al.  A beam finite element non‐linear theory with finite rotations , 1988 .

[23]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Application of deformable-body mean axis to flexible multibody system dynamics , 1986 .

[24]  E. Reissner.  On finite deformations of space-curved beams , 1981 .

[25]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  Geometrically exact 3D beam theory: implementation of a strain-invariant finite element for statics and dynamics , 1999 .

[26]  P. Betsch,et al.  Frame‐indifferent beam finite elements based upon the geometrically exact beam theory , 2002 .

[27]  Arthur Cayley,et al.  The Collected Mathematical Papers: On certain results relating to Quaternions , 2009 .

[28]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  An objective finite element approximation of the kinematics of geometrically exact rods and its use in the formulation of an energy–momentum conserving scheme in dynamics , 2002 .

[29]  Stanley W. Shepperd,et al.  Quaternion from Rotation Matrix , 1978 .

[30]  R. A. Spurrier.  Comment on " Singularity-Free Extraction of a Quaternion from a Direction-Cosine Matrix" , 1978 .

[31]  E. Reissner,et al.  On One‐Dimensional Large‐Displacement Finite‐Strain Beam Theory , 1973 .

[32]  A. Shabana,et al.  A Coordinate Reduction Technique for Dynamic Analysis of Spatial Substructures with Large Angular Rotations , 1983 .

[33]  K. C. Gupta,et al.  An historical note on finite rotations , 1989 .

[34]  B. J. Hsieh,et al.  Non-Linear Transient Finite Element Analysis with Convected Co--ordinates , 1973 .

[35]  E. Reissner.  On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: The plane problem , 1972 .

[36]  J. Stuelpnagel.  On the Parametrization of the Three-Dimensional Rotation Group , 1964 .