Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A D Linney,et al. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length. , 1992, International endodontic journal.
[2] G C Sanderink,et al. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs. , 1997, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[3] K Horner,et al. Radiovisiography: an initial evaluation , 1990, British Dental Journal.
[4] K Horner,et al. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography. , 1991, International endodontic journal.
[5] R. C. Murry,et al. Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology , 1990 .
[6] J Forsberg,et al. Radiographic reproduction of endodontic "working length" comparing the paralleling and the bisecting-angle techniques. , 1987, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.
[7] E Sonnabend,et al. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy. , 1989, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.
[8] T R Pitt Ford,et al. The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination. , 1993, International endodontic journal.
[9] F J Certosimo,et al. Endodontic working length determination--where does it end? , 1999, General dentistry.
[10] C. Engeler,et al. Christensen's Physics of Diagnostic Radiology. 4th ed , 1991 .
[11] C L Burger,et al. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.
[12] G C Sanderink,et al. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.
[13] H. Gröndahl,et al. Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system. , 1996, Endodontics & dental traumatology.
[14] G C Sanderink,et al. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[15] R A Cederberg,et al. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[16] C H Versteeg,et al. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.
[17] E Y Ong,et al. Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination. , 1995, International endodontic journal.
[18] Amelia del Pilar Almenar García,et al. Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length , 1997 .
[19] U. Welander,et al. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.
[20] W D McDavid,et al. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography. , 1994, Journal of endodontics.
[21] A Wenzel,et al. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review. , 1993, International dental journal.
[22] S. W. Schneider,et al. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.
[23] Y. Kuttler,et al. Microscopic investigation of root apexes. , 1955, Journal of the American Dental Association.