Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a digital radiograph imaging system (DDR) with conventional radiography for the purpose of estimating endodontic file lengths in curved canals of mandibular molars. STUDY DESIGN Sixty extracted human mandibular molars with root curvatures ranging from 5 degrees to 52 degrees were mounted in plastic blocks. Canal length was estimated by using on-screen DDR with both 2- and 3-click measurement and from conventional E-speed radiographs by using a millimeter ruler and x2 magnification. Two operators familiar with both radiographic methods performed the estimates. RESULTS One-way analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls tests revealed no significant differences between the groups. Although both conventional and DDR methods of analysis overestimated the true canal length, the DDR accuracy improved as the curvature severity increased. CONCLUSIONS The image quality of DDR systems has improved to the point that they can now be used for estimating canal lengths, even for curved canals, with accuracy comparable to that of conventional radiographs. However, further work remains to be done to optimize image quality.

[1]  A D Linney,et al.  Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length. , 1992, International endodontic journal.

[2]  G C Sanderink,et al.  Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs. , 1997, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[3]  K Horner,et al.  Radiovisiography: an initial evaluation , 1990, British Dental Journal.

[4]  K Horner,et al.  Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography. , 1991, International endodontic journal.

[5]  R. C. Murry,et al.  Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology , 1990 .

[6]  J Forsberg,et al.  Radiographic reproduction of endodontic "working length" comparing the paralleling and the bisecting-angle techniques. , 1987, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[7]  E Sonnabend,et al.  Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy. , 1989, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[8]  T R Pitt Ford,et al.  The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination. , 1993, International endodontic journal.

[9]  F J Certosimo,et al.  Endodontic working length determination--where does it end? , 1999, General dentistry.

[10]  C. Engeler,et al.  Christensen's Physics of Diagnostic Radiology. 4th ed , 1991 .

[11]  C L Burger,et al.  Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  G C Sanderink,et al.  Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[13]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system. , 1996, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[14]  G C Sanderink,et al.  Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths. , 1996, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[15]  R A Cederberg,et al.  Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[16]  C H Versteeg,et al.  Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  E Y Ong,et al.  Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination. , 1995, International endodontic journal.

[18]  Amelia del Pilar Almenar García,et al.  Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length , 1997 .

[19]  U. Welander,et al.  Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[20]  W D McDavid,et al.  Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography. , 1994, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  A Wenzel,et al.  Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review. , 1993, International dental journal.

[22]  S. W. Schneider,et al.  A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[23]  Y. Kuttler,et al.  Microscopic investigation of root apexes. , 1955, Journal of the American Dental Association.