Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: results in 32 cases.

A prospective clinical study was performed in 32 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to evaluate the sensitivity of lesion detection and accuracy of lesion localization by neurologic examination, delayed enhanced computed tomography (CT) with a double dose of contrast material, and proton magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. After neurologic examination patients were classified by probability of MS (possible, four patients; probable, three patients; and definite, 25 patients) and by disease activity (acute, chronic with acute exacerbation, or chronic progressive). Subsequently they underwent delayed enhanced CT scanning and MR imaging with more than one spin-echo technique. In five of seven patients with possible or probable MS, both MR imaging and delayed enhanced CT were negative. In 25 cases of definite MS, MR imaging detected pathology in 19 (76%) cases, while CT detected lesions in 15 (60%) of 25 cases. In acute lesions (acute or chronic with acute exacerbation), the two techniques were of similar sensitivity (delayed CT was positive in 65% and MR imaging in 60%), while in chronic progressive MS, MR imaging was superior in lesion detection (MR imaging positive in 75%; delayed CT in 25%). While most lesions (55%) were seen in corresponding locations in both studies, neither MR nor delayed CT correlated well with lesion localization by neurologic examination because a large number of asymptomatic lesions were imaged and many symptomatic lesions were undetected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  T J Brady,et al.  1H Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. , 1983, Neurologic clinics.

[2]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[3]  G M Bydder,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Imaging in White Matter Disease of the Brain Using Spin‐Echo Sequences , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  T. H. Newton,et al.  NMR demonstration of cerebral abnormalities: comparison with CT. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J Hoenninger,et al.  Visualization of cerebral and vascular abnormalities by NMR imaging. The effects of imaging parameters on contrast. , 1982, Radiology.

[6]  L. Hayman,et al.  Maximizing the harvest of contrast enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis , 1982, Neurology.

[7]  G M Bydder,et al.  Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  A. Fox,et al.  New perspectives in computed tomography of multiple sclerosis. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  A. S. Hall,et al.  NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE BRAIN IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS , 1981, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Gado,et al.  Computerized tomography in the diagnostic evaluation of multiple sclerosis , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[11]  D. Norman,et al.  Interval computed tomography in multiple sclerosis. , 1978, Radiology.

[12]  B. Carroll,et al.  Computerized cranial tomography in cerebral diseases of white matter , 1978, Neurology.

[13]  B. Bass,et al.  Multifocal CT enhancement in MS. , 1984, Neurology.

[14]  G. Bydder,et al.  NMR imaging of the brain using spin-echo sequences. , 1982, Clinical Radiology.

[15]  F. Roncaroli,et al.  Neuropathology of multiple sclerosis , 2012 .