Gaussian mixture discriminant analysis and sub-pixel land cover characterization in remote sensing

Mixture analysis is a necessary component for capturing sub-pixel heterogeneity in the characterization of land cover from remotely sensed images. Mixture analysis approaches in remote sensing vary from conventional linear mixture models to nonlinear neural network mixture models. Linear mixture models are fairly simple and generally result in poor mixture analysis accuracy. Neural network models can achieve much higher accuracy, but typically lack interpretability. In this paper we present a mixture discriminant analysis (MDA) model for inferring land cover fractions within forest stands from Landsat Thematic Mapper images. Specifically, individual class distributions are modeled as mixtures of subclasses of Gaussian distributions, and land cover fractions are estimated using the corresponding posterior probabilities. Compared to a benchmark study on accuracy of mixture models with Plumas National Forest data, this MDA model easily outperforms traditional linear mixture models and parallels the performance of the ARTMAP neural network mixture model. In other words, the MDA model is observed to successfully combine the performance characteristics of more complex neural network models (due to the nonlinear nature of its classification rules), with the ease of interpretation associated with linear mixture models (due to its relatively simple structure). MDA models therefore offer an attractive alternative for addressing the mixture modeling problem in remote sensing.

[1]  T. W. Ray,et al.  Nonlinear Spectral Mixing in Desert Vegetation , 1996 .

[2]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  The Use of Prior Probabilities in Maximum Likelihood Classification , 1980 .

[3]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data , 1996 .

[4]  Sucharita Gopal,et al.  Evaluation of the potential for providing secondary labels in vegetation maps , 1996 .

[5]  G. McLachlan,et al.  The EM algorithm and extensions , 1996 .

[6]  D. Roberts,et al.  Green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data , 1993 .

[7]  G. Foody Sharpening fuzzy classification output to refine the representation of sub-pixel land cover distribution , 1998 .

[8]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Subpixel forest cover in central Africa from multisensor, multitemporal data , 1997 .

[9]  John B. Adams,et al.  Classification of multispectral images based on fractions of endmembers: Application to land-cover change in the Brazilian Amazon , 1995 .

[10]  Gregory Asner,et al.  Endmember bundles: a new approach to incorporating endmember variability into spectral mixture analysis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation , 2002 .

[12]  R. Lucas,et al.  Non-linear mixture modelling without end-members using an artificial neural network , 1997 .

[13]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Mapping sub-pixel proportional land cover with AVHRR imagery , 1997 .

[14]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Vegetation in deserts. I - A regional measure of abundance from multispectral images. II - Environmental influences on regional abundance , 1990 .

[15]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models , 1998 .

[16]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Geographic Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 2001 .

[17]  S. Gerstl,et al.  Nonlinear spectral mixing models for vegetative and soil surfaces , 1994 .

[18]  J. Townshend,et al.  Continuous fields of vegetation characteristics at the global scale at 1‐km resolution , 1999 .

[19]  Sucharita Gopal,et al.  Visualization based on the fuzzy ARTMAP neural network for mining remotely sensed data , 2001 .

[20]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Using prior probabilities in decision-tree classification of remotely sensed data , 2002 .

[21]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Discriminant Analysis by Gaussian Mixtures , 1996 .

[22]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  On the estimation of spatial-spectral mixing with classifier likelihood functions , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[23]  Gail A. Carpenter,et al.  A Neural Network Method for Mixture Estimation for Vegetation Mapping , 1999 .

[24]  Robert L. Grossman,et al.  Data Mining for Scientific and Engineering Applications , 2001, Massive Computing.

[25]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[26]  Jr. James Edward Frew The image processing workbench , 1991 .

[27]  N. Campbell,et al.  Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum-likelihood classification , 1992 .

[28]  G. M. Foody,et al.  Relating the land-cover composition of mixed pixels to artificial neural network classification outpout , 1996 .

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[30]  Kaj Andersson,et al.  AVHRR-Based Forest Proportion Map of the Pan-European Area. , 2001 .