Crossing the Organizational Species Barrier: How Venture Capital Practices Infiltrated the Information Technology Sector

We examine the contagion processes whereby practices originating in one organizational population spread into and diffuse within a second. We theorize that “endemic” innovations native to one population spread to other populations through two distinct forms of contagion. We test this argument by observing information technology firms’ adoption of corporate venture capital programs. Results suggest that geographic proximity triggers cross-population contagion, that within-population contagion arises from different causal mechanisms, and that firms maintaining close cross-population ties pay less attention to the actions taken and outcomes experienced by other firms within their own industry. Fueled by emerging technology and a robust economy, corporate equity investing in start-up ventures exploded in the 1990s. The decade’s last five years alone saw a 3,800 percent increase, as corporate venture capital investments grew from $172 million to $6.8 billion (Venture Economics, 2006). Corporations scrambled to establish venture capital programs, identify best practices, and take equity in young entrepreneurial ventures. Rene Savelsberg, head of Philips’s corporate venture capital arm, described his program’s genesis as follows:

[1]  Noam Wasserman,et al.  Upside-Down Venture Capitalists and the Transition Toward Pyramidal Firms: Inevitable Progression, or Failed Experiment? , 2005 .

[2]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences , 1994 .

[3]  S. Kotha,et al.  Knowledge Creation Through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Industry , 2006 .

[4]  L. Burns,et al.  Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[5]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment , 1995 .

[6]  J. Heckman,et al.  A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data , 1984 .

[7]  Jeroen Huisman,et al.  The Travel of Ideas , 2007 .

[8]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  Myth or Reality? The Long-Run Underperformance of Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Venture and Nonventure Capital-Backed Companies , 1997 .

[9]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[10]  Vibha Gaba,et al.  Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Vance H. Fried,et al.  An Entrepreneur's Guide to the Venture Capital Galaxy , 2006 .

[12]  Paul A. Gompers Corporations and the Financing of Innovation: The Corporate Venturing Experience , 2002 .

[13]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The venture capital cycle , 1999 .

[14]  A. Stinchcombe Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[15]  Samuel Cohn,et al.  Learning from Other People's Actions: Environmental Variation and Diffusion in French Coal Mining Strikes, 1890-1935 , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data , 1985 .

[17]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[18]  G. Davis,et al.  Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  M. Lenox,et al.  When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? , 2003 .

[20]  O. Ornati,et al.  Compensating corporate venture managers , 1987 .

[21]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[22]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[23]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[24]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Corporate venture capitalists: Autonomy, obstacles, and performance , 1988 .

[25]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[26]  Heather A. Haveman Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[27]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation , 2000 .

[28]  J. Ivery,et al.  Organizational Ecology , 2007 .

[29]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry , 1998 .

[30]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[31]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[33]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  Institutional Influences on the Worldwide Expansion of Venture Capital , 2005 .

[34]  Kenneth W. Rind The Role of Venture Capital in Corporate Development , 1981 .

[35]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[36]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[37]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Learning , 2008 .

[38]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[39]  Hollister B. Sykes Corporate venture capital: Strategies for success , 1990 .

[40]  María Soledad Martínez Pería The economics of microfinance , 2006 .

[41]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[42]  P. Cooke Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[43]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Designing Corporate Ventures in the Shadow of Private Venture Capital , 2000 .

[44]  L. Bourgeois On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships , 2008 .

[46]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The Money of Invention , 2001 .

[47]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Interorganizational Learning and Heterogeneous Social Structure , 2005 .

[48]  J-P.A. Hobbs Free for all , 1994, Nature.

[49]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The Venture Capital Revolution , 2001 .

[50]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Marketing Niche Entry Decisions: Competition, Learning, and Strategy in Tokyo Banking, 1894–1936 , 2000 .

[51]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[52]  Isin Guler,et al.  Institutions, Networks, and Organizational Growth , 2006 .

[53]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  The Social Structure of Entrepreneurial Activity: Geographic Concentration of Footwear Production in the United States, 1940–19891 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  P. Allison Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories , 1982 .

[55]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Venture Capital, High Technology and Regional Development , 1988 .

[56]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[57]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[58]  H. Greve Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See is What You Do , 1998 .

[59]  CassimanBruno,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy , 2006 .

[60]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value , 2006 .

[61]  D. Strang,et al.  DIFFUSION IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills , 1998 .

[62]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[63]  B. Armendáriz,et al.  The Economics of Microfinance , 2006 .

[64]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[65]  Nilmini Wickramasinghe,et al.  Knowledge Creation , 2011, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management.

[66]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[67]  P. Hedström Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[68]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[69]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[70]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[71]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects, and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Barbara Czarniawska and Guje Sevón, eds. , 2006 .

[72]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[73]  Henry W. Chesbrough,et al.  Open innovation : ハーバード流イノベーション戦略のすべて , 2004 .

[74]  M. Ventresca,et al.  How Organizations Change: The Role of Institutional Support Mechanisms in the Incorporation of Higher Education Visibility Strategies, 1874-1995 , 2004 .

[75]  Guje Sevón,et al.  Translating organizational change , 1996 .

[76]  Harry J. Sapienza,et al.  Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries , 1996 .

[77]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[78]  Kyungmook Lee,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN LARGE LAW FIRMS: A RESOURCE DEPENDENCY AND INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE , 2002 .

[79]  Mark C. Suchman,et al.  The Hired Gun as Facilitator: Lawyers and the Suppression of Business Disputes in Silicon Valley , 1996, Law & Social Inquiry.

[80]  M. Kenney Understanding silicon valley : the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region , 2000 .

[81]  Claudia Bird Schoonhoven,et al.  Community, Population, and Organization Effects on Innovation: A Multilevel Perspective , 1996 .

[82]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data: Heterogeneity, omitted variable bias, and duration dependence , 1985 .

[83]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[84]  Theresa K. Lant,et al.  Mimetic Learning and the Evolution of Organizational Populations , 2002 .