Health Service Management Study for Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Two Models of Stroke Care

Background The most effective and efficient model for providing organized stroke care remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the effect of two models in a randomized controlled trial. Methods Patients with acute stroke were randomized on day one of admission to combined, co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care or traditionally separated acute/rehabilitation stroke care. Outcomes measured at baseline and 90 days post-discharge included functional independence measure, length of hospital stay, and functional independence measure efficiency (change in functional independence measure score ÷ total length of hospital stay). Results Among 41 patients randomized, 20 were allocated co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care and 21 traditionally separated acute/rehabilitation stroke care. Baseline measurements showed no significant difference. There was no significant difference in functional independence measure scores between the two groups at discharge and again at 90 days postdischarge (co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care: 103·6 ± 22·2 vs. traditionally separated acute/rehabilitation stroke care: 99·5 ± 27·7; P = 0·77 at discharge; co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care: 109·5 ± 21·7 vs. traditionally separated acute/rehabilitation stroke care: 104·4 ± 27·9; P= 0·8875 at 90 days post-discharge). Total length of hospital stay was 5·28 days less in co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care compared with traditionally separated acute/rehabilitation stroke care (24·15 ± 3·18 vs. 29·42 ± 4·5, P = 0·35). There was significant improvement in functional independence measure efficiency score among participants assigned to co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care compared with traditionally separated acute/rehabilitation stroke care (co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care: median 1·60, interquartile range: 0·87–2·81; traditionally separated acute/rehabilitation stroke care: median 0·82, interquartile range: 0·27–1·57, P = 0·0393). Linear regression analysis revealed a high inverse correlation (R2 = 0·89) between functional independence measure efficiency and time spent in the acute stroke unit. Conclusion This proof-of-concept study has shown that co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care was just as effective as traditionally separated acute/rehabilitation stroke care as reflected in functional independence measure scores, but significantly more efficient as shown in greater functional independence measure efficiency. Co-located acute/rehabilitation stroke care has potential for significantly improved hospital bed utilization with no patient disadvantage.

[1]  M. Pollack,et al.  Comprehensive Stroke Units: A Review of Comparative Evidence and Experience , 2013, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[2]  David Geffen,et al.  Getting the Methods Right — The Foundation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research , 2012 .

[3]  J. Bernhardt,et al.  Quality of life: An important outcome measure in a trial of very early mobilisation after stroke , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  G. Hankey,et al.  What do the results of the PRoFESS trial teach us? , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  A. Thrift,et al.  Economic Evaluation alongside a Phase II, Multi-Centre, Randomised Controlled Trial of Very Early Rehabilitation after Stroke (AVERT) , 2008, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[6]  J. Woo,et al.  In patient stroke rehabilitation efficiency: Influence of organization of service delivery and staff numbers , 2008, BMC health services research.

[7]  J. Stein,et al.  Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Functional Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke in Different Vascular Territories , 2007, Stroke.

[8]  D. Cordato,et al.  Establishment of a stroke unit in a district hospital: review of experience , 2007, Internal medicine journal.

[9]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  R. Teasell,et al.  Specialized Stroke Services: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Three Models of Care , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[11]  D. Cordato,et al.  Delirium within Three Days of Stroke in a Cohort of Elderly Patients , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  L Turner-Stokes,et al.  Efficiency of specialist rehabilitation in reducing dependency and costs of continuing care for adults with complex acquired brain injuries , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[13]  M. Harris,et al.  FIM Scores, FIM Efficiency, and Discharge Disposition Following Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation , 2006, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[14]  N. Lincoln,et al.  Ten year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of care in a stroke rehabilitation unit , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Y. Ang,et al.  Patient outcomes and length of stay in a stroke unit offering both acute and rehabilitation services , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  What are the components of effective stroke unit care? , 2002, Age and ageing.

[17]  E. Warburton,et al.  The evolution of stroke units-towards a more intensive approach? , 2000, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[18]  S. Slørdahl,et al.  Stroke unit treatment. 10-year follow-up. , 1999, Stroke.

[19]  O. Rønning,et al.  Stroke unit versus general medical wards, II: neurological deficits and activities of daily living: a quasi-randomized controlled trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[20]  J. Slattery,et al.  How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. , 1997, Stroke.

[21]  T. Olsen,et al.  The effect of a stroke unit: reductions in mortality, discharge rate to nursing home, length of hospital stay, and cost. A community-based study. , 1995, Stroke.

[22]  M. Alexander.  Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome: A Potential Use of Predictive Variables to Establish Levels of Care , 1994, Stroke.

[23]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.