The Lightweight Delft Cylinder Hand: First Multi-Articulating Hand That Meets the Basic User Requirements

Rejection rates of upper limb prostheses are high (23%-45%). Amputees indicate that the highest design priority should be reduction of the mass of the prosthetic device. Despite all efforts, the mass of the new prosthetic hands is 35%-73% higher than that of older hands. Furthermore, current hands are thicker than a human hand, they operate slower and do not provide proprioceptive force and position feedback. This study presents the Delft Cylinder Hand, a body powered prosthetic hand which mass is 55%-68% lower than that of the lightest current prosthetic hands, operates faster, has an anthropomorphic shape, and provides proprioceptive force and position feedback. The hand has articulating fingers, actuated by miniature hydraulic cylinders. The articulating fingers adapt to the shape of the grasped object. Its functional scores are similar to that of current prosthetic devices. The hand has a higher mechanical performance than current body-powered hands. It requires 49%-162% less energy from the user and it can deliver a higher maximum pinch force (30-60 N).

[1]  Heike Freud,et al.  Atlas Of Limb Prosthetics Surgical Prosthetic And Rehabilitation Principles , 2016 .

[2]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  A planar geometric design approach for a large grasp range in underactuated hands , 2011 .

[3]  D J Gow,et al.  The development of the Edinburgh modular arm system , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[4]  S. Millstein,et al.  Prosthetic Use in Adult Upper Limb Amputees: A Comparison of the Body Powered and Electrically Powered Prostheses , 1986, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  Linda Resnik,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Outcome Measures for Upper Limb Amputation , 2012 .

[6]  R. H. Meier,et al.  Functional Restoration of Adults and Children with Upper Extremity Amputation , 2004 .

[7]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Just L. Herder,et al.  Voluntary closing: A promising opening in hand prosthetics , 2003 .

[9]  J. Fischer,et al.  The Prehensile Movements of the Human Hand , 2014 .

[10]  Gerwin Smit,et al.  Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Kevin Warwick,et al.  Case Studies to Demonstrate the Range of Applications of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure , 2009 .

[12]  Gammon M Earhart,et al.  The 9-Hole Peg Test of Upper Extremity Function: Average Values, Test-Retest Reliability, and Factors Contributing to Performance in People With Parkinson Disease , 2011, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[13]  D D Frey,et al.  A body powered prehensor with variable mechanical advantage , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[14]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Elaine Biddiss,et al.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[16]  D. H. Plettenburg Basic requirements for upper extremity prostheses: the WILMER approach , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[17]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[18]  D R Broome,et al.  A TOTAL HYDRAULICALLY POWERED PROSTHETIC ARM SYSTEM , 1974 .

[19]  A. Sunderland,et al.  Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[20]  J. Van Frankenhuyzen Hydraulic brake-system for a bicycle , 2007 .

[21]  A. Kargov,et al.  Development of a Multifunctional Cosmetic Prosthetic Hand , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[22]  R. Hébert,et al.  Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  James H. Cauraugh,et al.  Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation , 2003, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[24]  G. Smit,et al.  Efficiency of Voluntary Closing Hand and Hook Prostheses , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[25]  Peter J Kyberd The influence of control format and hand design in single axis myoelectric hands: assessment of functionality of prosthetic hands using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[26]  J Kruit,et al.  Body-powered hand prosthesis with low operating power for children. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[27]  Jacqueline S. Hebert,et al.  Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[28]  Sujin Hwang,et al.  Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Improves Fine and Gross Motor Performance of the Upper Limb in Parkinson Disease , 2011, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[29]  S FISHMAN,et al.  The choice of terminal devices. , 1955, Artificial limbs.

[30]  Laura A. Miller,et al.  Summary and Recommendations of the Academy's State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures , 2009 .

[31]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Underactuated Robotic Hands , 2008, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[32]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Simulation and design of underactuated mechanical hands , 1998 .

[33]  G. Kejlaa,et al.  Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[34]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity , 1985 .

[35]  John T. McConville,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF INERTIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1975 .

[36]  Peter S. Lum,et al.  Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Bob Radocy Voluntary Closing Control : A Successful New Design Approach to an Old Concept , 2009 .

[38]  Markus Reischl,et al.  A hydraulically driven multifunctional prosthetic hand , 2005, Robotica.

[39]  C Myers,et al.  The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. Official publication of The American Occupational Therapy Association. , 1971, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[40]  D. Ramos,et al.  Practice of Hand Surgery , 1990 .

[41]  P. Herberts The Control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses , 1974 .

[42]  C. K. van der Sluis,et al.  The i-LIMB Hand and the DMC Plus Hand Compared: A Case Report , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[43]  M LeBlanc Current evaluation of hydraulics to replace the cable force transmission system for body-powered upper-limb prostheses. , 1990, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[44]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[45]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[46]  G. Smit,et al.  Comparison of mechanical properties of silicone and PVC (polyvinylchloride) cosmetic gloves for articulating hand prostheses. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[47]  C. Sollerman,et al.  Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[48]  P. Kyberd,et al.  Survey of Upper-Extremity Prosthesis Users in Sweden and the United Kingdom , 2007 .

[49]  C. Pylatiuk,et al.  Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.