Cross-Disciplinary Evidence for Hyperbolic Social Discount Rates

Researchers in different disciplines have independently found evidence to suggest that the social discount rate may be hyperbolic, rather than exponential, in nature. Both behaviorist research and some empirical economics studies support the hyperbolic discounting hypothesis. U.S. and U.K. government discounting dispensations for some long-run public development projects are explicable in terms of an underlying hyperbolic social discount rate. A statistical aggregation argument demonstrates that even if the behaviorist, economics and public choice evidence for hyperbolic discounting is not conclusive, the social discount rate of a set of people who individually express time preferences best modeled by exponential discounting functions is nonetheless hyperbolic. Further empirical economics studies of discounting preferences are required. Comparisons of different national discounting practices would also be useful to see how widespread is the use of unusually low exponential rates of discount for long-run projects. The application of hyperbolic discounting would have most impact in long-run benefit-cost analyses. However, government agencies would require overwhelming evidence before switching from exponential to hyperbolic discounting.

[1]  Gordon C. Winston,et al.  MYOPIC DISCOUNTING: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1988 .

[2]  Maureen L. Cropper,et al.  Rates of Time Preference for Saving Lives , 1992 .

[3]  M. Weitzman.  On the 'Environmental' Discount Rate , 1994 .

[4]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  G. Ainslie.  Matching is the integrating framework , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  G. Ainslie.  Derivation of "Rational" Economic Behavior from Hyperbolic Discount Curves , 1991 .

[7]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice , 1989 .

[8]  R. H. Strotz.  Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization , 1955 .

[9]  M. Cropper,et al.  Discounting Human Lives , 1991 .

[10]  G. Ainslie,et al.  Impulse control in pigeons. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  A. Logue.  Research on self-control: An integrating framework , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  R. Lyon.  Federal discount rate policy, the shadow price of capital, and challenges for reforms , 1990 .

[13]  Richard W. Wahl.  Markets for Federal Water: Subsidies, Property Rights, and the Bureau of Reclamation , 1989 .

[14]  B. Gilad,et al.  Handbook of behavioral economics , 1986 .

[15]  Richard B. Norgaard,et al.  Sustainability and discounting the future , 1991 .

[16]  J. E. Mazur.  An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[17]  H Rachlin,et al.  Probability and delay in commitment. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  J. Horowitz.  Environmental Policy Under a Non-Market Discount Rate , 1996 .

[19]  R. Thaler.  Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency , 1981 .

[20]  L. Green,et al.  Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .

[21]  C. Harvey.  The reasonableness of non-constant discounting , 1994 .

[22]  U. Ben-Zion,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1989 .

[23]  S. Kotz,et al.  Symmetric Multivariate and Related Distributions , 1989 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[25]  L. Green,et al.  Self-control in context , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  G. Ainslie.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  M. Reisner.  Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water , 1987 .

[28]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  J. E. Mazur.  Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  R. Lind,et al.  Reassessing the government's discount rate policy in light of new theory and data in a world economy with a high degree of capital mobility , 1990 .

[31]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement , 1981 .

[32]  I. Bateman,et al.  A multilevel modelling approach to triple-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation , 1996, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[33]  R. Lande,et al.  Optimal harvesting, economic discounting and extinction risk in fluctuating populations , 1994, Nature.

[34]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates and the implications for intergenerational discounting , 1995 .