Does long term performance improve following the appointment of a CIO?

The chief information officer (CIO) is crucial to integrating information technology into firm strategy. While there is evidence that capital markets react favorably to CIO appointments in the days surrounding the appointment announcement, this is the first study to examine the change in firm accounting performance in the years following the appointment of a new CIO. To control for exogenous factors unrelated to CIO effectiveness, the performance of appointing firms is measured relative to industry-wide average performance for firms that did not create a new or fill an existing CIO position. Using multiple accounting return measures that are responsive to changes in efficiency and effectiveness, we find an improvement in performance that is limited largely to firms appointing to newly created positions. As expected, there are significant performance increases for “first movers” who create new CIO positions early relative to their competitors; however, firms late to appoint their first CIO also obtain similar advantages. We also find that the effect on firm performance is contingent on the economic environment of the firm and that performance improvement is most pronounced for CIO appointments occurring later in calendar time, for firms operating in industries with low sales growth, and for firms in industries with highly dynamic economic environments.

[1]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[2]  Vicky Arnold,et al.  Further evidence on shareholder wealth effects of announcements for newly created CIO positions , 2006, DATB.

[3]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Examining the Shareholder Wealth Effects of Announcements of Newly Created CIO Positions , 2001, MIS Q..

[4]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of CIO Strategic Decision-Making Authority: An Empirical Study , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[5]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Contingency Theory: Some Suggested Directions , 1984 .

[6]  Shaun Pather,et al.  The chameleon: a metaphor for the Chief Information Officer , 2005 .

[7]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[8]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences , 1991, MIS Q..

[9]  Jing Wang,et al.  The Aftermath of Information Technology Outsourcing: An Empirical Study of Firm Performance Following Outsourcing Decisions , 2008, J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  A. Rasheed,et al.  Rational decision‐making and firm performance: the moderating role of the environment , 1997 .

[11]  David F. Larcker,et al.  The Structure and Performance Consequences of Equity Grants to Employees of New Economy Firms , 2002 .

[12]  C. Oliver SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[13]  Suresh Radhakrishnan,et al.  The Stock Market Valuation of R&D Leaders , 2006 .

[14]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[15]  Andrew Kakabadse,et al.  Leading the pack : future role of IS/IT professionals , 2000 .

[16]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Derek Oler,et al.  What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research , 2003 .

[18]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  B. Lev,et al.  A Rude Awakening: Internet Shakeout in 2000 , 2000 .

[20]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  Vincent L. Barker,et al.  CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Waleed A. Muhanna,et al.  IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[23]  R. Mason,et al.  The Influence Prism in SMEs: The Power of CEOs' Perceptions on Technology Policy and Its Organizational Impacts , 1997 .

[24]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Information Technology Governance in Information Technology Investment Decision Processes: The Impact of Investment Characteristics, External Environment, and Internal Context , 2008, MIS Q..

[25]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[26]  Yan Li,et al.  Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: do CIO characteristics make a difference? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Chief Information Officer: A Study of Managerial Roles , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[29]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[30]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[31]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1993 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHARED KNOWLEDGE TO IS GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2017 .

[32]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[33]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[34]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[35]  William R. King Including the CIO in Top Management , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[36]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[37]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Context on the Market Reaction to IT Investments , 2006, J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  The antecedents of CIO role effectiveness in Organizations:An empirical study in the healthcare sector , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[39]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[40]  Sanjeev Bhojraj,et al.  Who Is My Peer? A Valuation-Based Approach to the Selection of Comparable Firms , 2002 .

[41]  Richard L. Priem Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance , 1990 .

[42]  Waleed A. Muhanna,et al.  Information Technology and Process Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Interaction Between IT and Non-IT Resources , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[43]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[44]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[45]  Theophanis C. Stratopoulos,et al.  DuPont analysis of an IT-enabled competitive advantage , 2002, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Paul C. Nystrom,et al.  Environmental dynamism, complexity, and munificence as moderators of strategy-performance relationships , 1991 .

[47]  Ken Peffers,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Ashraf Khallaf,et al.  The Effects of Information Technology Expertise on the Market Value of a Firm , 2007, J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[50]  J. W. Medcof The Organizational Influence of the Chief Technology Officer , 2008 .