Reliability estimation based on operational data of manufacturing systems

Maintenance management has a direct influence on equipment reliability and safety. However, a large portion of traditional maintenance models and reliability analysis methods usually assumes that only perfect maintenance is performed on the system and the system will restore to as good as new regardless of the kind of preventive maintenance work-order that is performed. This is not practical in reality and may result in an inaccurate parametric estimation. The research objective of this paper is to develop a maximum likelihood estimation method to obtain more accurately estimated parameters based on the operational data of manufacturing systems, taking into consideration the difference between perfect and imperfect maintenance work-orders. Weibull distribution is specifically studied for this purpose. A practical case study based on industrial operational data from an automotive assembly line is performed to illustrate the implementation and efficiency of the proposed reliability estimation method. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Kendall.  Theoretical Statistics , 1956, Nature.

[2]  M. Stephens.  EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons , 1974 .

[3]  Loon Ching Tang,et al.  Bias correction for the least squares estimator of Weibull shape parameter with complete and censored data , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  J. Endrenyi,et al.  A failure-repair model with minimal and major maintenance , 1993 .

[5]  Derek Clements-Croome,et al.  Optimal maintenance policies under different operational schedules , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[6]  James K. Lindsey,et al.  Parametric Statistical Inference , 1996 .

[7]  Gian Carlo Montanari,et al.  In search of convenient techniques for reducing bias in the estimation of Weibull parameters for uncensored tests , 1997 .

[8]  Hideo Hirose,et al.  Bias correction for the maximum likelihood estimates in the two-parameter Weibull distribution , 1999 .

[9]  Authors' Biographies , 2005 .

[10]  Robert B. Randall,et al.  An inspection model with minimal and major maintenance for a system with deterioration and Poisson failures , 2000, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[11]  R. Ross,et al.  Bias and standard deviation due to Weibull parameter estimation for small data sets , 1996 .

[12]  William J. Zimmer,et al.  Comparison of estimation methods for weibull parameters: Complete and censored samples , 2003 .

[13]  Xiaojun Zhou,et al.  Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Min Xie,et al.  Robust Regression using Probability Plots for Estimating the Weibull Shape Parameter , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[15]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  On the convergence of interior-reflective Newton methods for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds , 1994, Math. Program..

[16]  Gregory Levitin,et al.  Structure optimization of multi-state system with time redundancy , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  R. Ross,et al.  Formulas to describe the bias and standard deviation of the ML-estimated Weibull shape parameter , 1994 .

[18]  T. Coleman,et al.  On the Convergence of Reflective Newton Methods for Large-scale Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds , 1992 .

[19]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1999 .

[20]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  An Interior Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds , 1993, SIAM J. Optim..