Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Fischhoff,et al. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .
[2] L. Ross,et al. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .
[3] John R. Gold,et al. Geography, the Media, and Popular Culture , 1985 .
[4] P Slovic,et al. Informing and educating the public about risk. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[5] P. Slovic. Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.
[6] Peter M. Sandman,et al. Risk Communication , 1988 .
[7] J. Durant,et al. The public understanding of science , 1989, Nature.
[8] Peter M. Sandman,et al. Hazard versus Outrage in the Public Perception of Risk , 1989 .
[9] P Slovic,et al. Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste , 1991, Science.
[10] B Fischhoff,et al. Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[11] Timothy C. Earle,et al. Social Trust , 1995 .
[12] N. Pidgeon. Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research , 1998 .
[13] L. Frewer,et al. RISK PERCEPTION, SOCIAL TRUST, AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING : IMPLICATIONS FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES , 1999 .
[14] Sjoberg. Factors in risk perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[15] Steven Miller,et al. Public understanding of science at the crossroads , 2001 .
[16] J. R. Weber,et al. The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak? , 2001 .
[17] Susan Stocklmayer,et al. Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition , 2003 .
[18] Carly McLachlan,et al. The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey , 2004 .
[19] A. Curtis,et al. Optimal elicitation of probabilistic information from experts , 2004, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
[20] Carly McLachlan,et al. The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: results from focus groups and a survey , 2004 .
[21] N. Allum,et al. Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes , 2004 .
[22] Naomi Oreskes,et al. Science and public policy: what's proof got to do with it? , 2004 .
[23] M. Baddeley,et al. An introduction to prior information derived from probabilistic judgements: elicitation of knowledge, cognitive bias and herding , 2004, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.
[24] M Granger Morgan,et al. Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.
[25] B. Latour. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern , 2004, Critical Inquiry.
[26] Patrick Devine-Wright,et al. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .
[27] P. England. John Perry’s neglected critique of Kelvin’s age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics , 2006 .
[28] David W. Mogk,et al. Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn about the Earth , 2006 .
[29] Z. Shipton,et al. What do you think this is? "Conceptual uncertainty" in geoscience interpretation , 2007 .
[30] M. Weiss,et al. Lessons from Science Communication Training , 2007, Science.
[31] Martin W. Bauer,et al. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda , 2007 .
[32] J. Pielke. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .
[33] Chris Mooney,et al. Framing Science , 2007, Science.
[34] Keigo Akimoto,et al. Public perceptions on the acceptance of geological storage of carbon dioxide and information influencing the acceptance , 2007 .
[35] Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .
[36] Laurance J. Donnelly,et al. Communication in geology: a personal perspective and lessons from volcanic, mining, exploration, geotechnical, police and geoforensic investigations , 2008 .
[37] S. Owens,et al. How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy , 2008 .
[38] Eric R. A. N. Smith,et al. Nimbyism vs. environmentalism in attitudes toward energy development , 2008 .
[39] D. Liverman. Environmental geoscience; communication challenges , 2008 .
[40] Bart W. Terwel,et al. Competence‐Based and Integrity‐Based Trust as Predictors of Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[41] Michael Siegrist,et al. Lay concepts on CCS deployment in Switzerland based on qualitative interviews , 2009 .
[42] Michael H. Stephenson,et al. The present and future use of ‘land’ below ground , 2009 .
[43] Matthew C. Nisbet,et al. Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement , 2009 .
[44] Howard J. Herzog,et al. Public risk perspectives on the geologic storage of carbon dioxide , 2009 .
[45] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. , 2009, American journal of botany.
[46] Matthew C. Nisbet,et al. Science communication reconsidered , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.
[47] P. Devine‐Wright. Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .
[48] Lennart Sjöberg,et al. Public risk perception of nuclear waste , 2009 .
[49] C. Cervato,et al. How Geoscientists Think and Learn , 2009 .
[50] Tiziana Rossetto,et al. The social psychology of seismic hazard adjustment: re-evaluating the international literature , 2010 .
[51] Gene Rowe,et al. Lay perceptions of carbon capture and storage technology , 2010 .
[52] Amy J. Burgin,et al. Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society , 2010 .
[53] A. Curtis,et al. Dynamics of uncertainty in geological interpretation , 2010, Journal of the Geological Society.
[54] Peta Ashworth,et al. Geothermal technology in Australia: Investigating social acceptance , 2011 .
[55] M. Siegrist,et al. Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.
[56] D. Kahan,et al. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus , 2011 .
[57] Pages. How Geoscientists Think and Learn , 2011 .
[58] Susan Joy Hassol,et al. Communicating the science of climate change , 2011 .
[59] C. Anderson,et al. Exploring CCS community acceptance and public participation from a human and social capital perspective , 2012, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
[60] A. Corner,et al. Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes , 2011 .
[61] Linda Steg,et al. Psychological perspectives on the geological disposal of radioactive waste and carbon dioxide , 2011 .
[62] J. Martínez-Frías,et al. Geoethics and Deontology: From Fundamentals to Applications in Planetary Protection , 2011 .
[63] A Skarlatidou,et al. What Do Lay People Want to Know About the Disposal of Nuclear Waste? A Mental Model Approach to the Design and Development of an Online Risk Communication , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[64] R. Lunn,et al. What makes an expert effective at interpreting seismic images , 2012 .
[65] Megumi Kano,et al. Communicating Actionable Risk for Terrorism and Other Hazards⋆ , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[66] Kim A. Kastens,et al. A synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences , 2012 .
[67] Andrew Curtis. The science of subjectivity , 2012 .
[68] Jonathan D. Phillips,et al. Storytelling in Earth sciences: The eight basic plots , 2012 .
[69] Michael Siegrist,et al. The Role of Convictions and Trust for Public Protest Potential in the Case of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) , 2012 .
[70] C. Manduca,et al. Geoscience and geoscientists: Uniquely equipped to study Earth , 2012 .
[71] S. Dessai,et al. Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science , 2013 .
[72] Deanna Kemp,et al. Social licence and mining: A critical perspective , 2013 .
[73] Ortwin Renn,et al. The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[74] Peta Ashworth,et al. Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies , 2013 .
[75] Bart W. Terwel,et al. ‘I Reject your Reality and Substitute my Own!’ Why More Knowledge about CO2 Storage Hardly Improves Public Attitudes , 2013 .
[76] Iain S. Stewart,et al. Earth stories: context and narrative in the communication of popular geoscience , 2013 .
[77] D. Brossard. New media landscapes and the science information consumer , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[78] Cecilia Waldenström,et al. Place Perceptions and Controversies over Forest Management: Exploring a Swedish Example , 2013 .
[79] Joshua Micah Hoffman,et al. A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING THE PUBLIC'S PERSPECTIVES OF MINING APPLIED TO THE KENTUCKY COAL INDUSTRY , 2013 .
[80] Transforming the Teaching of Geoscience and Sustainability , 2013 .
[81] LaurenceJohn Williams. Framing Fracking: Public responses to potential unconventional fossil fuel exploitation in the North of England , 2014 .
[82] Michael F. Dahlstrom. Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[83] S. Goater,et al. Integrating stakeholder perceptions of environmental risk into conventional management frameworks: coal seam gas development in Queensland , 2014 .
[84] A. Corner,et al. Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values , 2014 .
[85] Kieren Moffat,et al. The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining $ , 2014 .
[86] Mike S. Schäfer,et al. Media Representations of Climate Change: A Meta-Analysis of the Research Field , 2014 .
[87] G. Rife,et al. New Trends in Earth-Science Outreach and Engagement: The Nature of Communication , 2014 .
[88] Michael Siegrist,et al. Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): A review , 2014 .
[89] Anthony Leiserowitz,et al. “Fracking” Controversy and Communication: Using National Survey Data to Understand Public Perceptions of Hydraulic Fracturing , 2014 .
[90] Community attitudes towards science and technology in Australia , 2014 .
[91] J. Graham,et al. Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[92] C. Bond. Uncertainty in Structural Interpretation: Lessons to be learnt , 2015 .
[93] N. Sahlin,et al. Climate change, values, and the cultural cognition thesis , 2015 .
[94] Maurice B. Dusseault,et al. Hydraulic fracturing – Integrating public participation with an independent review of the risks and benefits , 2015 .
[95] C. Bond,et al. Structural model creation: the impact of data type and creative space on geological reasoning and interpretation , 2015, Special Publications.
[96] Jennifer J. Roberts,et al. Involving Communities in Deliberation : A Study of Three Citizens’ Juries on Onshore Wind Farms in Scotland , 2015 .
[97] Ian Thomson. Commentary: understanding and managing public reaction to ‘fracking’ , 2015 .
[98] Silvia Peppoloni,et al. Geoethics: Ethical, social, and cultural values in geosciences research, practice, and education , 2016 .
[99] Iain S. Stewart,et al. A "mental models" approach to the communication of subsurface hydrology and hazards , 2016 .
[100] L. Rist,et al. Theorising pathways to sustainability , 2016 .
[101] E. Maibach,et al. The effect of industry activities on public support for ‘fracking’ , 2016 .
[102] Vincent S. Cronin,et al. THE EMERGING FIELD OF GEOETHICS , 2017 .
[103] Todd P. Newman. Tracking the release of IPCC AR5 on Twitter: Users, comments, and sources following the release of the Working Group I Summary for Policymakers , 2017, Public understanding of science.
[104] W. Shakespeare,et al. Geology and Culture : A Call for Action , 2022 .