Are Persuasive Technologies Really Able to Communicate?: Some Remarks to the Application of Discourse Ethics

Since a while the ethics of persuasive technology PT have been discussed. One interesting approach is the assessment of PTs in the light of discourse ethics and the speech-act theory as proposed recently. While some see such an approach as promising, the author will illustrate that the application of discourse ethics is only appropriate for a few limited persuasive strategies. It is argued that most often PT does not provide the essentials of a discourse; reason or arguments to convince the counterpart. In line with discourse ethics the elements of speech-act theory refer to the preconditions every debater has to subscribe to in order to reach a mutual understanding that is the ultimate goal of a discourse. It is evident that PT has to deal with serious problems in order to fulfill the preconditions such as comprehensibility, truth, truthfulness and legitimacy. If discourse ethics is the theoretical framework which reflects the moral content of PT, the intention of the designer and his arguments or reasons have to be taken into account. It is argued that this often contradicts the purpose of persuasion or manipulation if PT is applied. This paper provides propositions that should ensure that the design of PT fulfill the basic requirements of discourse ethics.

[1]  Kenneth E. Andersen.  Persuasion : theory and practice , 1978 .

[2]  J. Habermas.  The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[3]  John MacFarlane,et al.  Future contingents and relative truth , 2003 .

[4]  M. Bunge.  Towards a Technoethics , 1975 .

[5]  Enrique Dussel.  The architectonic of the ethics of liberation , 1997 .

[6]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  How Quickly Should a Communication Robot Respond? Delaying Strategies and Habituation Effects , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics , 1993 .

[8]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[9]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[10]  R. Burkart.  On Jürgen Habermas and public relations , 2007 .

[11]  Rocci Luppicini.  Technoethics and the Evolving Knowledge Society: Ethical Issues in Technological Design, Research, Development, and Innovation , 2010 .

[12]  H. Jonas.  The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age , 1985 .

[13]  J. Habermas.  Communication and the Evolution of Society , 1979 .

[14]  G. Warnke,et al.  Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective , 1984 .

[15]  Adam Waytz,et al.  Social Cognition Unbound , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.

[16]  Daniel Berdichevsky,et al.  Toward an ethics of persuasive technology , 1999, CACM.

[17]  David B. Wilson,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry by Albert Borgmann (review) , 1986 .

[18]  Warren A. French,et al.  Resolving a Moral Conflict Through Discourse , 1998 .

[19]  W. Outhwaite.  Habermas: A Critical Introduction , 1994 .

[20]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Toward a Systematic Understanding of Suggestion Tactics in Persuasive Technologies , 2007, PERSUASIVE.

[21]  A. Richters,et al.  The relevance of Jürgen Habermas' work for counselling , 1987 .

[22]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technologie301398 , 1999, CACM.

[23]  Athanassios Tzouvaras.  Logic of Knowledge and Utterance and the Liar , 1998, J. Philos. Log..

[24]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .

[25]  S. Jacobs.  Speech acts and arguments , 1989 .

[26]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The influence of robot anthropomorphism on the feelings of embarrassment when interacting with robots , 2010, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[27]  D. O’Keefe.  The concepts of argument and arguing , 1982 .

[28]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[29]  K. Riley.  Telling more than the truth: Implicature, speech acts, and ethics in professional communication , 1993 .

[30]  J. Habermas.  Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , 1990 .

[31]  Andreas Spahn,et al.  And Lead Us (Not) into Persuasion…? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.